Jump to content

Adolf Hitler

Jericho

By Jericho
in General

Recommended Posts

HORUS Newbie

HORUS

Posted
Posted
' pid='2180115' dateline='1242518705']

Hitler was the greatest man to ever walk the earth' date=' and I am not joking at all. Hitler is the one man I idolize.

[/quote']

 

Had he not killed so many, I'd agree.

Frankly, if he didn't and just did what he did without any killing, I'd be with you.

 

But sadly, that is not the case.

 

EDIT: @ Hunter: MSN if you can.

 

Hitler should have killed more people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 214
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest JoshIcy

Guest JoshIcy

Posted
Posted
' pid='2180739' dateline='1242523653']
' pid='2180115' dateline='1242518705']

Hitler was the greatest man to ever walk the earth' date=' and I am not joking at all. Hitler is the one man I idolize.

[/quote']

 

Had he not killed so many, I'd agree.

Frankly, if he didn't and just did what he did without any killing, I'd be with you.

 

But sadly, that is not the case.

 

EDIT: @ Hunter: MSN if you can.

 

Hitler should have killed more people.

 

No. He should have either killed one, or none.

That one being himself. To end experience is to end all. To end experience and all, cannot be justified. And if you justify it. Yourself should go first, because it wouldn't be a problem then. If it's greed, well then... Good luck.

 

I guess a random off topic fact: Oddly enough, it was hearing that he killed his dog, that first got me to notice him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HORUS Newbie

HORUS

Posted
Posted
' pid='2180739' dateline='1242523653']
' pid='2180115' dateline='1242518705']

Hitler was the greatest man to ever walk the earth' date=' and I am not joking at all. Hitler is the one man I idolize.

[/quote']

 

Had he not killed so many, I'd agree.

Frankly, if he didn't and just did what he did without any killing, I'd be with you.

 

But sadly, that is not the case.

 

EDIT: @ Hunter: MSN if you can.

 

Hitler should have killed more people.

 

No. He should have either killed one, or none.

That one being himself. To end experience is to end all. To end experience and all, cannot be justified. And if you justify it. Yourself should go first, because it wouldn't be a problem then. If it's greed, well then... Good luck.

 

I guess a random off topic fact: Oddly enough, it was hearing that he killed his dog, that first got me to notice him.

 

1. He did kill himself.

2. He did not kill his dog.

3. I have no clue what you are trying to say in the bolded section

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Felix Culpa Newbie

Felix Culpa

Posted
Posted

Adolf Hitler was not a great man. He lied to his country about the outside world, cutting off the country from the news of the outer world to make it seem like he was a bright and shining good.

 

EDIT: Hitler did not just kill 6,000,000 Jews. But he also killed 1.4x that amount of Christians in the POW camps and forced labor camps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HORUS Newbie

HORUS

Posted
Posted

Adolf Hitler was not a great man. He lied to his country about the outside world' date=' cutting off the country from the news of the outer world to make it seem like he was a bright and shining good.

 

EDIT: Hitler did not just kill 6,000,000 Jews. But he also killed 1.4x that amount of Christians in the POW camps and forced labor camps.

[/quote']

 

You, sir, are a funking idiot. Hitler himself was a Christian. If he did kill 1.4 x 6 Mil christians (which didn't happen) then it wasn't for being christian.

 

I wish he had killed that many christians though.

 

9 Million died in the holocaust. By your calculations, he must have killed 9 Million christians, alone. But then you also said that 6 Million Jews died, so that's 15 Million people. Wouldn't you say 15 million is more than 9 Million?

 

 

Remember, you're arguing with someone who has read Mein Kampf, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, and Hitler: A Study In Tyranny (each book is over 600 pages long, Rise and Fall is over a thousand, I think.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kagamine Len Newbie

Kagamine Len

Posted
Posted

Deuling' date=' you actually have a point. But there was no other way for Hitler to achieve his goals.

 

Hybrid, learn about Hitler, then come back when you can hold an arguement.

[/quote']

 

All my experience on him comes from my experience not on him.

^

|

|

|

 

That was confusing...

 

On a side note, someone came to my school who had been in the camps and such. His arguement is definately against Hitler. He lost his whole family for crying out loud! Well, except for two brothers... thats out of a family of 15 though. *cries a little*

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ezio Newbie

Ezio

Posted
Posted

[align=center]

Hitler was not a great man, if you wish to become the most hated man in the history of the world then yes Hitler is a good idol, if you wish to kill 6,000,000 jews and 3,000,000 other people, Hitler is a good idol, if you honestly wish these then you my friend deserve to die a slow and painful death. Scientifically he was not a genius, he had ideas, they had flaws.

I have had this discussion with my Science teacher.

[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huntar! Newbie

Huntar!

Posted
Posted

Sorry. Altair understands too.

Deuling, idc.

DA, you focus on him killing millions. But you can't comprehend how pulled Germany out of a war-torn state, skyrockeded the econemy, organized it, then led it into another war in which it was winning for more than half of. Thats a real leader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Static Newbie

Static

Posted
Posted

I prefer Stalin over Hitler...he at least gave rise to a superpower state and didn't go on mad genocide schemes.

 

But when talking about other leaders of 'authoritarian regimes'' date=' I prefer Deng Xiaoping of Communist China. When he became its leader, he received a poor and ruined China. (thanks to Mao Zedong's mad communist schemes)

 

However, this great man knew the importance of making money and income. Thus, he allowed free trade once again and established some private industries. Also, he implemented the SAR system which give both Hong Kong and Macau self-rule.

 

Now, the legacy of Deng lives on to the good true Communists of the world...particularly the current Chinese Prime Minister, Wen Jiabao.

 

ALL HAIL CHINA!

[/quote']

 

China... Communist????

 

Ha, even before Clinton got into office; they betrayed the revolution when they started trying to steal the cultures of others.

 

God Bless Tibet

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Now let's set the record straight.

 

Hitler was a true socialist.

 

His intention was to win the war, claim the world as his own, and manifest his dream. Once all of the "impurities" (in his eyes) were cleansed from the earth, he wanted a world where everyone could live in peace, with love for each other (and of course the country and its leader because he was an egomaniac). None the less, in the end, despite how twisted the man was, his intentions were those of every revolutionary, true to the creation of content coexistence between men.

 

That said, he was still a nationalist and a militarist, so he was the worst kind of person: a patriot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ezio Newbie

Ezio

Posted
Posted

Sorry. Altair understands too.

Deuling' date=' idc.

DA, you focus on him killing millions. But you can't comprehend how pulled Germany out of a war-torn state, skyrockeded the econemy, organized it, then led it into another war in which it was winning for more than half of. Thats a real leader.

[/quote']

 

[align=center]

I know, that he did well, but he couldn't have done it without his evil plans. Which is why he is not a great man, he had to kill 9,000,000 people to take his country out of a terrible financial crisis.

[/align]

 

Hitler was the most evil man? Are you aware that Stalin killed 20 Million people and oppressed the governed?

 

[align=center]

Yes I am aware of that.

However Hitler is the most hated.

It is the common opinion that Hitler is the most hated man ever.

[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CrabHelmet Newbie

CrabHelmet

Posted
Posted

A message to those who believe Hitler was pretty awesome: while he may have acted in his own country's benefit, his actions were certainly to the detriment of the rest of the world. Surely a truly great man acts to better all of humanity rather than the portion of humanity that happened to be born in a certain geographical region that holds a certain set of metaphysical beliefs. And let us not forget that he ultimately failed (and made some incredibly idiotic decisions as well, like staging a land war against his only powerful ally when anyone who remembered Napoleon would have seen that this would be a bad idea), which rather puts him out of the running for MOST BEST AWESOME EVER, especially since that then screwed over the few people he was trying to help by forcing them to spend the next half-century cleansing themselves of genocide and applying for re-admission to the human race.

 

He's not a world leader' date=' but Franz Fedinand's driver. He took a wrong turn, and some teenager shot Franz when they were turning. If it weren't for him, WW1 mightn't have happened.

[/quote']

 

This sort of statement is made by idiots who have no grasp of history, but think they do because they're too ignorant to even realize that they are ignorant.

 

They look at WWI and say "Archduke Ferdinand's death caused WWI, so if he had survived, WWI would never have happened!" This conclusion would be perfectly logical if Archduke Ferdinand's death occurred in a vacuum and was the one and only problem in an otherwise shiny happy utopia of non-conflict.

 

History does not work that way.

 

A great European was had been brewing for more than half a century by that point, there had already been a much smaller-scale war a decade earlier, and tensions were so high that just about anything would be capable of triggering a war in the Balkans, which would quickly consume the rest of the world. Archduke Ferdinand's death just so happened to be that trigger, but it didn't need to happen for the war to occur; if he had survived, the world would still be on the verge of war, and some other minor problem would trigger it anyhow.

 

so who do you think was the worst world leader? i think it was Bill Clinton.

 

In conclusion: Everyone in this topic is a colossal moron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rustyowl Newbie

rustyowl

Posted
Posted

Hitler may have helped so many people in Germany, however, I'm pretty sure all those on this thread who support Hitler wouldn't care so much about him if they were Jews in the Holocaust. Same goes with those who dislike Hitler, if they were in Germany at the time and weren't Jewish or some race that Hitler hated.

 

Basically, Hitler was both a great and horrible man. It just depends on what perspective you look at, however there is no right or wrong way to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...