「tea.leaf」 Posted May 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 List some. Also' date=' if you're just gonna list Lightsworn, you might as well just make a Lightsworn deck.[/quote'] Plenty if we are talking traditional format, but just in case you arent... Why would I be talking about traditional? Are you honestly so thick headed that you haven't noticed Chaos Sorcerer has been limited for 2 whole months? Shining Angel*Reads the rest of your list first.*So you're gonna want to pull Skelengel in attack mode' date=' Marshmallon in attack mode, or risk in consistency by maining three of Shining Angel just to nab the one DD Warrior Lady in your deck? And you go on to call ME a bad duelist? Lol. SkelegelHas to be attacked by your opponent to be any good. Marshy (you must be really dumb if you say no to this...)Has to be attacked by your opponent to be any good. Reflect BounderHas to be attacked by your opponent to be any good. Thunder DragonYou're grasping for straws if you honestly think any deck other then Exodia or some kind of OTK would main this. D.D. Warrior LadyIf you're maining D.D. Warrior Lady and you let it fall into the graveyard then you're doing it wrong. Cyber DragonThe only passable card' date=' limited to one. Running Zaborg seems pointlessYou use it as another light type monster in order to run Chaos Sorcerer. Wow your either so full of fail or you just dont know the object of an envoy/ chaos deck... just in case your one of the two I'll make things simple... The objet is to get LIGHT AND DARK monsters in your grave, and Loling at shining angel proves you obviously cant run a deck like this, or your plain full of fail, your pick... Hey, everyone, look at this guy; he's so cool. Chaos Sorcerer isn't a win condition, dear. Wow do we have total tards here?running 3 shining angels for an envoy deck is obviously not rightok then Mystic Tomato is out...did it look like I was discussing a victory condition?Stop the fail please... Instead of making empty insults when you hold no credibility, why not try saying something relevant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Wow do we have total tards here?running 3 shining angels for an envoy deck is obviously not rightok then Mystic Tomato is out...did it look like I was discussing a victory condition?Stop the fail please... Mystic Tomato's got plenty of halfway decent targets in a deck though. The blackwing tuner guy, Newdoria, Diamond Dude, and Don Zaloog. Honestly, you're grasping at straws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Hey another light monster that wasn't mentionned. I noticed everything destroy monsters wich is redundant. Something different wouldn't hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Wow your either so full of fail or you just dont know the object of an envoy/ chaos deck... just in case your one of the two I'll make things simple... The objet is to get LIGHT AND DARK monsters in your grave' date=' and Loling at shining angel proves you obviously cant run a deck like this, or your plain full of fail, your pick...[/quote'] The object of most decks is to win. (Unless you're self disrespecting fool who runs Self Destruct Button or something.) Monarch decks work by controlling and limiting you opponents moves and then beating them down with 2400 sticks, whenever you can afford to tribute. The fact that they can whip out a 2300 beatstick that can also RFG is just an easily splashable cherry on top, nothing more. And if you honestly don't think Chaos monsters are incredibly splashable into any deck that can afford to put in a decent amount of darks and lights in a deck, then you're quite the terrible duelist if I do say so myself. yes because its called a Zaborg deck not a chaos deck...note there are such things as traps and spells that deal damage, or is this beyond you? Edit @ Tea: Ok, Zaborg can die in a fire because it fails as a light monster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Hey another light monster that wasn't mentionned. I noticed everything destroy monsters wich is redundant. Something different wouldn't hurt. His own effect works against the actual summoning of Chaos Sorcerer by removing Light monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Hey another light monster that wasn't mentionned. I noticed everything destroy monsters wich is redundant. Something different wouldn't hurt. His own effect works against the actual summoning of Chaos Sorcerer by removing Light monsters. No I'm thinking a full light deck with 3 nova summoner, 3 honest, 3 freed the brave wanderer and 3 dimensional alchemist (to recycle things) maybe with some ryko and a dd lady... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkerai Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Wow your either so full of fail or you just dont know the object of an envoy/ chaos deck... just in case your one of the two I'll make things simple... The objet is to get LIGHT AND DARK monsters in your grave' date=' and Loling at shining angel proves you obviously cant run a deck like this, or your plain full of fail, your pick...[/quote'] The object of most decks is to win. (Unless you're self disrespecting fool who runs Self Destruct Button or something.) Monarch decks work by controlling and limiting you opponents moves and then beating them down with 2400 sticks, whenever you can afford to tribute. The fact that they can whip out a 2300 beatstick that can also RFG is just an easily splashable cherry on top, nothing more. And if you honestly don't think Chaos monsters are incredibly splashable into any deck that can afford to put in a decent amount of darks and lights in a deck, then you're quite the terrible duelist if I do say so myself. yes because its called a Zaborg deck not a chaos deck...note there are such things as traps and spells that deal damage, or is this beyond you? Burn decks are terriable or is this beyond you? Why would it be called a Zaborg Deck and not a monarch deck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 yes because its called a Zaborg deck not a chaos deck...By your logic' date=' we should name every deck after any random card that happens to be in it."Hey guys! Check out my Test Tiger deck!""Rate fix my new Monster Reborn Deck!"Or, heck, even going back to your terrible examples:"Guys! I got a new Shining Angel deck!"Though that's not really too fair since such a thing as "Ratbox" exists, and I'm sure some day we'll be playing "Shinebox", but I digress. The point being... actually, I'm not sure what the hell your point is, so I can't possibly string together a coherent counter point. note there are such things as traps and spells that deal damage, or is this beyond you?... You lost me here. Are you talking about Ookazi or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 yes because its called a Zaborg deck not a chaos deck...By your logic' date=' we should name every deck after any random card that happens to be in it."Hey guys! Check out my Test Tiger deck!""Rate fix my new Monster Reborn Deck!"Or, heck, even going back to your terrible examples:"Guys! I got a new Shining Angel deck!"Though that's not really too fair since such a thing as "Ratbox" exists, and I'm sure some day we'll be playing "Shinebox", but I digress. The point being... actually, I'm not sure what the hell your point is, so I can't possibly string together a coherent counter point. note there are such things as traps and spells that deal damage, or is this beyond you?... You lost me here. Are you talking about Ookazi or something? Stalling, destroying and countering/dealing damage. If you cant understand this, then theres no point for you to quote and reply to me again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 I just don't understand when people aren't making sense. Sorry. The issue we're discussing now (apparently) is whether or not Zaborg should be used in a deck to justify maining Chaos Sorcerer. Why are we going on a tangent about stalling, destroying, and burning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 I just don't understand when people aren't making sense. Sorry. The issue we're discussing now (apparently) is whether or not Zaborg should be used in a deck to justify maining Chaos Sorcerer. Why are we going on a tangent about stalling' date=' destroying, and burning?[/quote'] *Facepalm* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkerai Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 I just don't understand when people aren't making sense. Sorry. The issue we're discussing now (apparently) is whether or not Zaborg should be used in a deck to justify maining Chaos Sorcerer. Why are we going on a tangent about stalling' date=' destroying, and burning?[/quote'] *Facepalm* What was your point that Chaos Sorceror isn't splashable in burn or something??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Hey another light monster that wasn't mentionned. I noticed everything destroy monsters wich is redundant. Something different wouldn't hurt. His own effect works against the actual summoning of Chaos Sorcerer by removing Light monsters. No I'm thinking a full light deck with 3 nova summoner' date=' 3 honest, 3 freed the brave wanderer and 3 dimensional alchemist (to recycle things) maybe with some ryko and a dd lady...[/quote'] Err... okay? But what does that have to do with the current conversation? <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 I just don't understand when people aren't making sense. Sorry. The issue we're discussing now (apparently) is whether or not Zaborg should be used in a deck to justify maining Chaos Sorcerer. Why are we going on a tangent about stalling' date=' destroying, and burning?[/quote'] *Facepalm* What was your point that Chaos Sorceror isn't splashable in burn or something??? I was talking about the mechanics of the deck itself and how it works, but since now we are totaly off subject and you cant understand, I say theres no reason to drag this out, and on that note we go back to the stupid Lightning afro dude... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted May 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Edit @ Tea: Ok' date=' Zaborg can die in a fire because it fails as a light monster[/quote'] How does Zaborg fail as a LIGHT monster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Luxlord, the only one who doesn't think that you aren't making sense is yourself. So stop while you're ahead. Zaborg is a great card that is outclassed by better cards. [/topic] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 List some. Also' date=' if you're just gonna list Lightsworn, you might as well just make a Lightsworn deck.[/quote'] Plenty if we are talking traditional format, but just in case you arent... Shining Angel ~ Shining Angel has no place in any Deck other than Sky Scourge, and Sky Scourge isn't even competitive.Skelegel ~ No.Marshy (you must be really dumb if you say no to this...) ~It's good, but it's not a better option than Zaborg. In fact, I'd probably run both of them in the same Deck.Reflect Bounder ~ No.Thunder Dragon ~ No.D.D. Warrior Lady ~Good, yes, but I'd probably run it in the same Deck as Zaborg.Cyber Dragon ~ Good, yes, but I'd probably run it in the same Deck as Zaborg. Running Zaborg seems pointless ~No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 List some. Also' date=' if you're just gonna list Lightsworn, you might as well just make a Lightsworn deck.[/quote'] Plenty if we are talking traditional format, but just in case you arent... Shining Angel ~ Shining Angel has no place in any Deck other than Sky Scourge, and Sky Scourge isn't even competitive.Skelegel ~ No.Marshy (you must be really dumb if you say no to this...) ~It's good, but it's not a better option than Zaborg. In fact, I'd probably run both of them in the same Deck.Reflect Bounder ~ No.Thunder Dragon ~ No.D.D. Warrior Lady ~Good, yes, but I'd probably run it in the same Deck as Zaborg.Cyber Dragon ~ Good, yes, but I'd probably run it in the same Deck as Zaborg. Running Zaborg seems pointless ~No. *Facepalm AGAIN* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted May 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 List some. Also' date=' if you're just gonna list Lightsworn, you might as well just make a Lightsworn deck.[/quote'] Plenty if we are talking traditional format, but just in case you arent... Shining Angel ~ Shining Angel has no place in any Deck other than Sky Scourge, and Sky Scourge isn't even competitive.Skelegel ~ No.Marshy (you must be really dumb if you say no to this...) ~It's good, but it's not a better option than Zaborg. In fact, I'd probably run both of them in the same Deck.Reflect Bounder ~ No.Thunder Dragon ~ No.D.D. Warrior Lady ~Good, yes, but I'd probably run it in the same Deck as Zaborg.Cyber Dragon ~ Good, yes, but I'd probably run it in the same Deck as Zaborg. Running Zaborg seems pointless ~No. *Facepalm AGAIN* You're not cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 List some. Also' date=' if you're just gonna list Lightsworn, you might as well just make a Lightsworn deck.[/quote'] Plenty if we are talking traditional format, but just in case you arent... Shining Angel ~ Shining Angel has no place in any Deck other than Sky Scourge, and Sky Scourge isn't even competitive.Skelegel ~ No.Marshy (you must be really dumb if you say no to this...) ~It's good, but it's not a better option than Zaborg. In fact, I'd probably run both of them in the same Deck.Reflect Bounder ~ No.Thunder Dragon ~ No.D.D. Warrior Lady ~Good, yes, but I'd probably run it in the same Deck as Zaborg.Cyber Dragon ~ Good, yes, but I'd probably run it in the same Deck as Zaborg. Running Zaborg seems pointless ~No. *Facepalm AGAIN* You're not cool. Again with the assumptions...I'm mad people keep bringing this up, I said drop it.You should be harping at them, not me...MOVING ON! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted May 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 List some. Also' date=' if you're just gonna list Lightsworn, you might as well just make a Lightsworn deck.[/quote'] Plenty if we are talking traditional format, but just in case you arent... Shining Angel ~ Shining Angel has no place in any Deck other than Sky Scourge, and Sky Scourge isn't even competitive.Skelegel ~ No.Marshy (you must be really dumb if you say no to this...) ~It's good, but it's not a better option than Zaborg. In fact, I'd probably run both of them in the same Deck.Reflect Bounder ~ No.Thunder Dragon ~ No.D.D. Warrior Lady ~Good, yes, but I'd probably run it in the same Deck as Zaborg.Cyber Dragon ~ Good, yes, but I'd probably run it in the same Deck as Zaborg. Running Zaborg seems pointless ~No. *Facepalm AGAIN* You're not cool. Again with the assumptions...I'm mad people keep bringing this up, I said drop it.You should be harping at them, not me...MOVING ON! In other words... OH DEAR, I'VE ONLY NOW REALIZED THAT I'VE JUST MADE A TOTAL FOOL OF MYSELF. PLEASE LOOK THE OTHER WHILE I ATTEMPT TO REGAIN MY DIGNITY AND CREDIBILITY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 List some. Also' date=' if you're just gonna list Lightsworn, you might as well just make a Lightsworn deck.[/quote'] Plenty if we are talking traditional format, but just in case you arent... Shining Angel ~ Shining Angel has no place in any Deck other than Sky Scourge, and Sky Scourge isn't even competitive.Skelegel ~ No.Marshy (you must be really dumb if you say no to this...) ~It's good, but it's not a better option than Zaborg. In fact, I'd probably run both of them in the same Deck.Reflect Bounder ~ No.Thunder Dragon ~ No.D.D. Warrior Lady ~Good, yes, but I'd probably run it in the same Deck as Zaborg.Cyber Dragon ~ Good, yes, but I'd probably run it in the same Deck as Zaborg. Running Zaborg seems pointless ~No. *Facepalm AGAIN* You're not cool. Again with the assumptions...I'm mad people keep bringing this up, I said drop it.You should be harping at them, not me...MOVING ON! In other words... OH DEAR, I'VE ONLY NOW REALIZED THAT I'VE JUST MADE A TOTAL FOOL OF MYSELF. PLEASE LOOK THE OTHER WHILE I ATTEMPT TO REGAIN MY DIGNITY AND CREDIBILITY. Yes because the comment was made just yesterday and saying I realized it right now makes perfect sense...I can see my mistakes and try to fix them, it looks like your still working on that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 whats so bad about reflect bounder? with 1700 ATK, he can do some good damage, and if attacked your getting 1700 points of damage at the very least. now I know you guys are all up on your otk or nothing position, but damage over 1000 from a single card is good. unless I'm completely missing the point, and it is the kill efffect your talking about, which in reflect bounder's case, is crappy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.