Phanax Leminer Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 [align=center]Aiku: FAIRY!!! With angel wings and an armor... OwO I'm in heaven.Phanax: Riiiight... Four-Winged Enforcer LORE:1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Fairy-type monstersWhen this card is Summoned, destroy all cards you control, except this card. Each turn, this card can attack as many of your opponent's monsters as the number of destroyed cards by this card effect. When this card destroyed a monster by battle, it gains 200 ATK and loses 200 DEF.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrcMan321 Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 "It gains 200 and and loses 200" ??? Nice though 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 this is a great card but its OP if your field is full and you Summon it then you ditch 8 cards and this card can attack 8 times. thats waaaaaaaay OP. You need restrictions and a pretty big drawback to make this balanced. And toss the gains and loses thing because that saying exactly this "When this card destroys and monster leave its attack the same." Unless you ment and loses 200 DEF which is ok just go back and add it in until then 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanax Leminer Posted June 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 this is a great card but its OP if your field is full and you Summon it then you ditch 8 cards and this card can attack 8 times. thats waaaaaaaay OP. You need restrictions and a pretty big drawback to make this balanced. And toss the gains and loses thing because that saying exactly this "When this card destroys and monster leave its attack the same." Unless you ment and loses 200 DEF which is ok just go back and add it in until then 7/10I understand that' date=' but that's when the knownledge of being beated to death by card effect similar to this that come handy. That's true, the card can attack up to 8 times if I ditch 8 cards from her effect, but that a close look at this card effect. Each turn, this card can attack as many of your [b']opponent's monsters[/b] as the number of destroyed cards by this card effect. That means that I can attack up to 8 time my opponents monsters, but it cannot attack your opponent's Life Points directly if she does this effect. As for the decrease and increase, her ATK will only increase, if the original DEF isn't lower than 200. Which mean that her ATK will be at max 3200 ATK with 0 DEF. All of this is in the ruling of YGO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lacikus Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Make WIND atribute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanax Leminer Posted June 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Make WIND atribute. Do you mean this card or making a WIND attribute monster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 this is a great card but its OP if your field is full and you Summon it then you ditch 8 cards and this card can attack 8 times. thats waaaaaaaay OP. You need restrictions and a pretty big drawback to make this balanced. And toss the gains and loses thing because that saying exactly this "When this card destroys and monster leave its attack the same." Unless you ment and loses 200 DEF which is ok just go back and add it in until then 7/10I understand that' date=' but that's when the knownledge of being beated to death by card effect similar to this that come handy. That's true, the card can attack up to 8 times if I ditch 8 cards from her effect, but that a close look at this card effect. Each turn, this card can attack as many of your [b']opponent's monsters[/b] as the number of destroyed cards by this card effect. That means that I can attack up to 8 time my opponents monsters, but it cannot attack your opponent's Life Points directly if she does this effect. As for the decrease and increase, her ATK will only increase, if the original DEF isn't lower than 200. Which mean that her ATK will be at max 3200 ATK with 0 DEF. All of this is in the ruling of YGO. for the first part i misread it srry ^^ not OPbut im still confused about the increase decrease situation. just like are you saying Increase it's attack by 200 and lower its attack by 200? or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanax Leminer Posted June 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 this is a great card but its OP if your field is full and you Summon it then you ditch 8 cards and this card can attack 8 times. thats waaaaaaaay OP. You need restrictions and a pretty big drawback to make this balanced. And toss the gains and loses thing because that saying exactly this "When this card destroys and monster leave its attack the same." Unless you ment and loses 200 DEF which is ok just go back and add it in until then 7/10I understand that' date=' but that's when the knownledge of being beated to death by card effect similar to this that come handy. That's true, the card can attack up to 8 times if I ditch 8 cards from her effect, but that a close look at this card effect. Each turn, this card can attack as many of your [b']opponent's monsters[/b] as the number of destroyed cards by this card effect. That means that I can attack up to 8 time my opponents monsters, but it cannot attack your opponent's Life Points directly if she does this effect. As for the decrease and increase, her ATK will only increase, if the original DEF isn't lower than 200. Which mean that her ATK will be at max 3200 ATK with 0 DEF. All of this is in the ruling of YGO. for the first part i misread it srry ^^ not OPbut im still confused about the increase decrease situation. just like are you saying Increase it's attack by 200 and lower its attack by 200? or what? AAHHHH!! You're right! DX *edit the card in a time record* Thanks to pointing that out! ^w^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 :O oooooohhhhh ok i was cunfuzzled about like "Lower? Lower wat >>?" lols 9/10 (my highest score) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanax Leminer Posted June 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 :O oooooohhhhh ok i was cunfuzzled about like "Lower? Lower wat >>?" lols 9/10 (my highest score) Phanax: You're highest score? Thanks! ^^ Aiku: OMG!!! WE GOT THE HIGHEST SCORE FROM LADY!!! THAT'S FRE-*Phanax punches Aiku*Phanax: Calm down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 relatively balanced card. lv a bit high though 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.