JG. Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 [align=center]Yeah, that's right bish, I made a Fusion Monster. Fusion see too little play in todays meta, and I haven't exactly made support from them *snickers*, but they're fun to make IMO, so here's 1 for an existing Archetype in the OCG; the Flamvells. 1 Warrior-Type monster + 1 "Flamvell" monsterIncrease the DEF of this card by 200 for each "Flamvell" monster in your Graveyard. During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent. If this card destroys a monster by battle, decrease the ATK of this card by 200. The last part of the effect is to balance it out, as a 3000 ATK monster with a peircing effect with no downside would be OP'ed IMO. This is also 1 of the cards in my upcoming Duelist Pack, "Duelist Pack JG" (lol). Fix OCG, if any, rate and comment.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paladin of mana Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 Pretty Good Fusion, 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tainted Wisdom Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 I think it is absolutely fabulous JG. Though I haven't heard of the Flamevells before. Could you possibly fill me in on them?9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted July 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Flamvell Here ya go. And thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tainted Wisdom Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 Thank you to you too.(That sounds weird) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted July 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 Yeah, it does. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel of Silence Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 Great card. Good way to balance it. Pic looks good as well. 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rakesh Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 Nice card. 9/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted July 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 Thanks guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Traceur:. Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 let see... OCG: 9/10 ('cause i think you need to put this: "This card cannot be Special Summone excpet by Fusion Summon." I am maybe wrong.)Effect: 8/10 (Not very original the 1stand 2nd; the 3th is ok, it balances the card)Pic: 10/10 (Awesome) :DName: 8/10 (It's ok;not very creative) Overall: 35/40 - Excellent Not your best card... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 excellent card. nothing wrong with it 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted July 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 let see... OCG: 9/10 ('cause i think you need to put this: "This card cannot be Special Summone excpet by Fusion Summon." I am maybe wrong.)Effect: 8/10 (Not very original the 1stand 2nd; the 3th is ok' date=' it balances the card)Pic: 10/10 (Awesome) :DName: 8/10 (It's ok;not very creative) Overall: 35/40 - [b'] Excellent [/b] Not your best card... You don't have to put the "This card can only be Special Summoned by Fusion Summon"; it's optional. As for the name, gotta make it fit in with teh archetype, I can't call it "Super Ultra Mega Flamvell Commander" when this other are just called "Flamvell Paun" and "Flamvell Draco" etc. Same for effect, the Flamvells don't exactly have elaborate effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.