Eury Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 effect too simple and dull. It should have another to make it stand out. 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HunterRowe Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 nice for a dragon deck, i like it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 Ok pic (not great) OCG Fix: "Dragon Type" should be "Dragon-Type" "This card gains 100 ATK and DEF points for every card removed" should read "This card gains 100 ATK and DEF for each card removed by this effect." other then that it's fine but its OP right now grossly lower the attack to 2300. and the level to 7. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 it doesn't need the atk lowered, not with that minimal atk boost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 Well Perhaps not but even with the minimalness of its attack increase it can still become overpowering with an effect like that because it's attack is pretty much 3400. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 so what? Without any other immunities it's easily countered anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 but if it absolutely doesnt need a drastic attack change it should atleast be dropped to 2500 so that it's attack becomes 3000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 ok I'll give you that. Personally I just feel your suggestion of dropping to 2300 is a little TOO low Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 so what? Without any other immunities it's easily countered anyway or is it? if the effect is interpreted as "as long as the cards are removed then it keeps that attack" then its OP but if it means "if a card removed is returned to play then it loses 100 ATK" then its ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted July 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 better or should i keep it the way it was? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 lol well then it looks like we agree with each other. I think your right in it being balaced ok and you agree with my attack deduction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 yeah, now it looks better I'll raise the rating up to 8/10 now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted July 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 thanks im new to this so this is good as its only my 3rd card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 my rating = ragnarok's ratingits ok ^^ normally i'd hate your card but i've gotten nicer ^^ thats to ragnarok pointing out my total viciousness and a MOD catching me flaming o-o (by hate i mean every new member trys to make a dragon and fails epicly but you didnt) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.