necrofearless Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 discuss the win/phail of this card. and suggest which cards work even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 ult. offering is at 2, we really don't need this card since it can't have a copy of it used more than once per turn. chain summoning is better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff! Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 what. Chain summoning is not better. Ulti-off is better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 what. Chain summoning is not better. Ulti-off is better. I meant in terms of double summon, read it. I uses different lines like this to separate points on a card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff! Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 Chain summoning sucks, way too hard to activate, while this is simple, and completely free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 Chain summoning sucks' date=' way too hard to activate, while this is simple, and completely free.[/quote'] Summon Red/Green/Yellow Gadget > Chain something (not hard at all) > activate this.When it comes to Geminis it is bad, but werewolf was talking 'bout the card in general (I think so :D ) And Double Summon is bad everywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 Cliff beat me to it. Gadgets are pwnsome with Chain Summoning. Also, my IRL Synchro deck runs Double Summon >______> Double Summon isnt bad, but its not really good either. Its sort of a meh-ish card.Ehh, it has uses now and then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.