Jump to content

Cyber Dragon my version


Recommended Posts

I hope you like these cards. And yeh DON"T SAY ANY THINK ABOUT THE PIC













Effect::: [[[( [Dark Cyber Dragon] + [Dark Cyber Dragon] + [Dark Cyber Dragon]


[Dark Cyber Dragon] + [Dark Cyber Twin Dragon]

This card is also treated as Dragon type monster. During battle between this card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent's LP. Ignore all of the opponent effects that targets this card. This card cannot be destroyed by battle.(damage calculation appears normally). This card can attack 3 times each turn. )]]]


Please rate and comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you said not to mention about the pics but I can't resist.


THOSE PICS ARE JUST INVERTS which isn't all that bad.


They seem quite strong cause of their effects.

I know that they are invert' date=' it was the only way I could find to make them look dark.




Wouln't this be in Pop Culture?

anyway the cards are allright

I was never a big fan of machines

Maybe they should be at Pop Culture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get rid of the Dragon-Type. They are Machines' date=' not Dragons.


Sure, they are called Dragons but they have ABSOLUTELY no flesh and blood.


It indicates that it should [b']only[/b] be Machine, not Dragon.


And besides, you can't do double types like that.


if you are going to but machine and dragon on 1st card than you have


put the sentence(this is for dual-typing)

"This card is also treated as (insert type here) monster."


cards are OPed as you already said




It's impossible for a card to have 2 types' date=' OCG errors and they are awfully OP'd.


Overall: 4/10



OK, I'll fix them now.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Create New...