ĎλЯклξššζ Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 I hope you like these cards. And yeh DON"T SAY ANY THINK ABOUT THE PIC Effect::: [[[( [Dark Cyber Dragon] + [Dark Cyber Dragon] + [Dark Cyber Dragon]OR[Dark Cyber Dragon] + [Dark Cyber Twin Dragon]This card is also treated as Dragon type monster. During battle between this card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent's LP. Ignore all of the opponent effects that targets this card. This card cannot be destroyed by battle.(damage calculation appears normally). This card can attack 3 times each turn. )]]] Please rate and comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rucario Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 I know yuou said not to mention about the pics but I can't resist. THOSE PICS ARE JUST INVERTS which isn't all that bad. They seem quite strong cause of their effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord.Alucard. Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Wouln't this be in Pop Culture?anyway the cards are allright I was never a big fan of machines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ĎλЯклξššζ Posted August 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 I know you said not to mention about the pics but I can't resist. THOSE PICS ARE JUST INVERTS which isn't all that bad. They seem quite strong cause of their effects.I know that they are invert' date=' it was the only way I could find to make them look dark. Wouln't this be in Pop Culture?anyway the cards are allright I was never a big fan of machinesMaybe they should be at Pop Culture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxdmilleo Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 lol inverts cards are a bit OPed um i give you a 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ĎλЯклξššζ Posted August 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Yeh I know that thy are OP I like OP cards because nearly all my cards are OP!! Thanx dude......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkunruh Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 javascript:uploadtoimageshack(); Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Chaos Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 why did you type that anyway nice cards sort of OP but yeah i like OP cards aswell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ĎλЯклξššζ Posted August 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 javascript:uploadtoimageshack();What on earth is this ???????????? why did you type that anyway nice cards sort of OP but yeah i like OP cards aswellThanx dude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milk-Chan Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Why are they typed Dragon and Machine? A tip: Type it as one, but in the effect say it is also "[insert other type here]".And they are really OP'd. It would be more balanced if you stuck to the original ATK/DEF, but kept the effects.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ĎλЯклξššζ Posted August 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Why are they typed Dragon and Machine? A tip: Type it as one' date=' but in the effect say it is also "[insert other type here']".And they are really OP'd. It would be more balanced if you stuck to the original ATK/DEF, but kept the effects.6/10Why can't they be 2 types?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamengland Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 Get rid of the Dragon-Type. They are Machines, not Dragons. Sure, they are called Dragons but they have ABSOLUTELY no flesh and blood. It indicates that it should only be Machine, not Dragon. And besides, you can't do double types like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathSDelano Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 if you are going to but machine and dragon on 1st card than you have put the sentence(this is for dual-typing)"This card is also treated as (insert type here) monster." cards are OPed as you already said 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowKnight27 Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 It's impossible for a card to have 2 types, OCG errors and they are awfully OP'd. Overall: 4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ĎλЯклξššζ Posted August 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 Get rid of the Dragon-Type. They are Machines' date=' not Dragons. Sure, they are called Dragons but they have ABSOLUTELY no flesh and blood. It indicates that it should [b']only[/b] be Machine, not Dragon. And besides, you can't do double types like that. if you are going to but machine and dragon on 1st card than you have put the sentence(this is for dual-typing)"This card is also treated as (insert type here) monster." cards are OPed as you already said 8/10 It's impossible for a card to have 2 types' date=' OCG errors and they are awfully OP'd. Overall: 4/10[/quote'] OK, I'll fix them now..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.