Rise of the Eldrazi Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 After a year, my 1000th post :3 !!! Thanks for the img wanderley 8)[align=center][spoiler=Lore]1 Beast-Type monster + 1 Winged-Beast-Type monster + 1 Reptile-Type monsterWhent this card is Fusion Summoned, you can Special Summon 1 Level 6 or lower Beast-Type monster from your Deck or Graveyard. This card can attack twice during the same Battle Phase. This card inflicts Piercing Damage. If this card destroys a monster by battle, inflict damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed monsters ATK or DEF, whichever is higher. During the End Phase of a turn in which this card is Summoned, destroy it and take damage equal to it's ATK. [/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 I dont know if you can say "This card inflicts Piercing Damage", You have to say"During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent.". And "If this card destroys a monster by battle," should be "When this card destroys a monster by battle and sends it to the Graveyard,"The last effect can be skipped with "Interdimensional Matter Transporter"Congratulations for your 1000 posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwistedFlameApe Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 I dont know if you can say "This card inflicts Piercing Damage"' date=' You have to say"During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent.". And "If this card destroys a monster by battle," should be "When this card destroys a monster by battle and sends it to the Graveyard,"The last effect can be skipped with "Interdimensional Matter Transporter"Congratulations for your 1000 posts.[/quote'] actually 1 of the cyberdark cards says specifically "this card inflicts peircing damage" i cant remember which 1 it is but you should give it a look up. i was surprised when i saw it too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTF Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 OCG errors 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderley Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 cograntsnice effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rise of the Eldrazi Posted August 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Thanks peeps.OCG errors 8/10 BTW, saying just that and giving a rating is against the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Piercing Damage, that isn't right. I am a huge fan of the pic though and the effect is really nice. +1 rep for the 1k.10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rise of the Eldrazi Posted August 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Thanks!About the piercing damage...[spoiler=Look] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
☆ Master Sami ☆ Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 What is up with u guys?! only lame people these days use "The difference between this card's ATK and a...etc.", IT'S THE NEW OCG, LIVE WITH IT! - When his card is Fusion Summon= When this card is Fusion Summon- ATK of DEF = ATK or DEF- During the End Phase of a turn in which this card is Summoned = During the End Phase of a turn in which this card was Summoned- monsters = monster's (on the 3rd line, last word in the Lore) Very nice card, but a little UPed, you should change the last effect to: "During the End Phase of a turn in which this card destroyed a monster, destroy it and take damage equal to it's ATK." that certainly makes it better. 9.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rise of the Eldrazi Posted August 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Thanks for help! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 twice attack, trample ability, and the burn effect is all good, but it should have some sort of drawback to prevent it from being OPed 8.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rise of the Eldrazi Posted August 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 ok with the modifications I'll raise the rate to 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antist0opid Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 I'm sorry but what is Peircing Damage? Anyway, good card, If I knew what Peircing Damage as I would Rate. But i also think the card is a little op'd because you inflict more damage that you take and you get to special summon a lv6 monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 piercing damage is just the damage done when a monster of higher atk attacks another monster with lower def Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antist0opid Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 oh so like Bladeedge or AncientGear Golem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
740kt Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 I don't think you need the "whichever is higher" part because obviously you'll pick the higher one... It seems OP'd, but overall, it's pretty good.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kronikman Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 overall good card. pic is 10/10. name is nice not OP. the OCG is slightly off like "inflict damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed monsters ATK or DEF, whichever is higher." sounds a little wierd but other than that its perfect. 9-9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rise of the Eldrazi Posted August 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 Thanks!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.