Cless Alvein Posted September 16, 2009 Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 Ok I was watching Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's today on demand and I saw a deck that really caught my eye: Fortune Ladies! They are used by that Carly Dark Signer chick and I reeeeeeeeally liked her deck so I did some research on the cards and I am totaly gonna make my deck simmilar to hers. So this is what mine would look like: (btw, if anyone doesnt know what these new cards do just go to the Yugioh wikipedia site cause most of them havent been releasd...) Monsters:Earthbound Immortal Aslla PiscuFortune Lady Light x3Fortune Lady Dark x3Fortune Lady Fire x2Fortune Lady Water x2Fortune Lady Earth x2Fortune Lady Wind x3Solitaire Magical x2 Spells:Future Visions x2Field BarrierTerraformingSoul ExchangeBook Of Moon x2Monster ReincarnationFortune Future x2Time Passage x3 Traps:Slip Of Fortune x2Magic Jammer x2Magic CylinderSpirit BarrierOjama Trio (dunno if I should add another or take it out for something else...)Twist of Fate x2 So thats it! my Fortune Lady Deck!!! I will pobobly make a different one but this is the one Im gonna foucus on first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just-duelist Posted September 16, 2009 Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 just about everyone knows who the fortune ladies r...anyways take out cylinder & m-jammer imediatly before you get flamed for it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cless Alvein Posted September 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 Why would I get flamed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just-duelist Posted September 16, 2009 Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 Why would I get flamed? becus jammer is considerd an outclass and bad cardand cylinder should only be ran in burn... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cless Alvein Posted September 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 point given and taken...so any ideas for a replacement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabber2033 Posted September 16, 2009 Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 Dark Bribe > Magic JammerMirror Force/Torrential Tribute > Magic Cylinder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cless Alvein Posted September 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 That could work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson General Posted September 16, 2009 Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 add Mirror Force take out the Earthys, they fail Dark, Light, Fire, and Wind @ 3 Water and 2 or 3 no Earth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted September 16, 2009 Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 @ just duelist, maybe you can explain this to me. why can cylinder only be ran in burn?not one person has yet to explain this baffling statement to me.thats like saying roar can only be used in an exodia deck. it seems to me that any deck that would run (i know these are bad) d prison or sakuretsu, which are (theoretically) runnable in any deck that would assume it will be attacked, any deck which could run those would be just as capable of running cylinder, would it not?why does cylinder's burn clause, if that really is the problem, force it to be ran exclusively in burn decks? it doesnt make sense to me.obviously no one runs sakuretsu, d prison (a few people do) or cylinder for the flaw of non-chainability. this i know. and this makes sense. but why would you include a clause stipulating that cylinder can only be run in burn? it doesnt make sense to me. next.. i feel like the aslla should be run in its own deck. it fits nicely here, given the field spell, but thats not really enough to run it, imo. even at one it seems situational and dead drawy. edit: amending that statement. on second thought, i feel that aslla can work well here, but he needs more support. i think we can make earthbound ladies work. [/troll] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cless Alvein Posted September 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 I see your point Fat Guy but I am gonna make a seperate deck for Aslla Piscu. But for now, I havent done enough reaserch for a good enough deck for Aslla Piscu sooo ya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cless Alvein Posted September 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted September 16, 2009 Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 @ just duelist' date=' maybe you can explain this to me. why can cylinder only be ran in burn?not one person has yet to explain this baffling statement to me.thats like saying roar can only be used in an exodia deck. it seems to me that any deck that would run (i know these are bad) d prison or sakuretsu, which are (theoretically) runnable in any deck that would assume it will be attacked, any deck which could run those would be just as capable of running cylinder, would it not?why does cylinder's burn clause, if that really is the problem, force it to be ran exclusively in burn decks? it doesnt make sense to me.obviously no one runs sakuretsu, d prison (a few people do) or cylinder for the flaw of non-chainability. this i know. and this makes sense. but why would you include a clause stipulating that cylinder can only be run in burn? it doesnt make sense to me. next.. i feel like the aslla should be run in its own deck. it fits nicely here, given the field spell, but thats not really enough to run it, imo. even at one it seems situational and dead drawy. edit: amending that statement. on second thought, i feel that aslla can work well here, but he needs more support. i think we can make earthbound ladies work. [/troll'] Basically, it's a situational -1 that deals damage to your opponent, which isn't really good in any stretch in the imagination. Even in burn decks, Magic Cylinder is meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted September 16, 2009 Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 @ just duelist' date=' maybe you can explain this to me. why can cylinder only be ran in burn?not one person has yet to explain this baffling statement to me.thats like saying roar can only be used in an exodia deck. it seems to me that any deck that would run (i know these are bad) d prison or sakuretsu, which are (theoretically) runnable in any deck that would assume it will be attacked, any deck which could run those would be just as capable of running cylinder, would it not?why does cylinder's burn clause, if that really is the problem, force it to be ran exclusively in burn decks? it doesnt make sense to me.obviously no one runs sakuretsu, d prison (a few people do) or cylinder for the flaw of non-chainability. this i know. and this makes sense. but why would you include a clause stipulating that cylinder can only be run in burn? it doesnt make sense to me. next.. i feel like the aslla should be run in its own deck. it fits nicely here, given the field spell, but thats not really enough to run it, imo. even at one it seems situational and dead drawy. edit: amending that statement. on second thought, i feel that aslla can work well here, but he needs more support. i think we can make earthbound ladies work. [/troll'] Basically, it's a situational -1 that deals damage to your opponent, which isn't really good in any stretch in the imagination. Even in burn decks, Magic Cylinder is meh. that made me laugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted September 16, 2009 Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 Fortune Ladies work best without Future Visions and the earthbound. [22] MONSTERS 3 Fortune Lady Darky2 Chaos Sorcerer 3 Breaker the Magical Warrior3 Cyber Valley3 Fortune Lady Lighty3 Fortune Lady Watery2 Magical Exemplar1 Blackwing - Gale the Whirlwind1 Fortune Lady Firey1 Witch of Catoblepas and Fate [13] SPELLS 3 Different Dimension Gate3 Fortune Future2 Allure of Darkness2 Golden Sarcophagus1 Giant Trunade1 Heavy Storm1 One For One [5] TRAPS 3 Compulsory Evacuation Device1 Call of the Haunted1 Torrential Tribute [40] Total *credit to SephirothKirby for the deck* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 i like it when people dont read my posts.but because they dont, i'm going to have to grab their attention: @Mystery Guest. HEY DUMBSHIT clearly you only skimmed my post, and thus got a poor interpretation of my argument. unfortunately for you, this makes you funking retarded. i'm now going to bolden the things that make your obnoxious flame misplaced. pay attention: @ just duelist' date=' maybe you can explain this to me. [b']why can cylinder only be ran in burn?[/b]not one person has yet to explain this baffling statement to me.thats like saying roar can only be used in an exodia deck. it seems to me that any deck that would run (i know these are bad) d prison or sakuretsu, which are (theoretically) runnable in any deck that would assume it will be attacked, any deck which could run those would be just as capable of running cylinder, would it not?why does cylinder's burn clause, if that really is the problem, force it to be ran exclusively in burn decks? it doesnt make sense to me.obviously no one runs sakuretsu, d prison (a few people do) or cylinder for the flaw of non-chainability. this i know. and this makes sense. but why would you include a clause stipulating that cylinder can only be run in burn? it doesnt make sense to me. next.. i feel like the aslla should be run in its own deck. it fits nicely here, given the field spell, but thats not really enough to run it, imo. even at one it seems situational and dead drawy. edit: amending that statement. on second thought, i feel that aslla can work well here, but he needs more support. i think we can make earthbound ladies work. [/troll] as you can see, i agree that the card is bad. its bad because its not chainable. this is really the only reason. my question was why people say its bad "outside of burn". k? comprende you stupid sheet?dear god, i wish idiots like you didnt have that picture readily hotlinkable. that one and like 3 others. you wander around these forums looking for people to insult so you can feel better about yourself, and try to fool others into thinking youre charmingly witty. anyone can make a demotivational post. especially one as badly off-form as that. you arent funny and you arent clever and you certainly cant funking read. edit:i actually just realized, your demotivational fail at trolling actually further validates my question about why cylinder is better in burn than anywhere else.and then you proceeded to claim that it isnt good in burn either.so you psuedo-contradict yourself because youre attempting to troll. and failing. ot:straightup fortuneladies are alright, but i think we can work with aslla, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 OffTopic: I asked the same question in the TCG section and the answer was: "it burnz" OnTopic: Run 0 Earthy. It's just a horrible beatstick. And maybe less Windy and more Watery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 @ just duelist' date=' maybe you can explain this to me. why can cylinder only be ran in burn?not one person has yet to explain this baffling statement to me.thats like saying roar can only be used in an exodia deck. it seems to me that any deck that would run (i know these are bad) d prison or sakuretsu, which are (theoretically) runnable in any deck that would assume it will be attacked, any deck which could run those would be just as capable of running cylinder, would it not?why does cylinder's burn clause, if that really is the problem, force it to be ran exclusively in burn decks? it doesnt make sense to me.obviously no one runs sakuretsu, d prison (a few people do) or cylinder for the flaw of non-chainability. this i know. and this makes sense. but why would you include a clause stipulating that cylinder can only be run in burn? it doesnt make sense to me. next.. i feel like the aslla should be run in its own deck. it fits nicely here, given the field spell, but thats not really enough to run it, imo. even at one it seems situational and dead drawy. edit: amending that statement. on second thought, i feel that aslla can work well here, but he needs more support. i think we can make earthbound ladies work. [/troll'] MC isn't bad. It's just outclassed by at least 5 other cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cless Alvein Posted September 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 Ok Arkel like I said in a previous post Im gonna probobly stick to this thus far... But that doesnt mean Im not gonna consider your Deck list! of course im gonna expieriment with these cards so thanks bro I appreciate it! ^_^ I will consider your list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 TC, remove the following:Fortune Lady Earth x2Fortune Lady Wind x3Solitaire Magical x2Field BarrierSoul ExchangeMonster ReincarnationFortune Future x2Magic Jammer x2Magic CylinderSpirit BarrierThey are un-needed' date=' and there are far better options. that made me laugh.Of course it did, Im the origional one who made it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
☨βlack☨ Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 i like it when people dont read my posts.but because they dont' date=' i'm going to have to grab their attention: [b']@Mystery Guest. HEY DUMBSHIT[/b] clearly you only skimmed my post, and thus got a poor interpretation of my argument. unfortunately for you, this makes you f***ing retarded. i'm now going to bolden the things that make your obnoxious flame misplaced. pay attention: @ just duelist' date=' maybe you can explain this to me. [b']why can cylinder only be ran in burn?[/b]not one person has yet to explain this baffling statement to me.thats like saying roar can only be used in an exodia deck. it seems to me that any deck that would run (i know these are bad) d prison or sakuretsu, which are (theoretically) runnable in any deck that would assume it will be attacked, any deck which could run those would be just as capable of running cylinder, would it not?why does cylinder's burn clause, if that really is the problem, force it to be ran exclusively in burn decks? it doesnt make sense to me.obviously no one runs sakuretsu, d prison (a few people do) or cylinder for the flaw of non-chainability. this i know. and this makes sense. but why would you include a clause stipulating that cylinder can only be run in burn? it doesnt make sense to me. next.. i feel like the aslla should be run in its own deck. it fits nicely here, given the field spell, but thats not really enough to run it, imo. even at one it seems situational and dead drawy. edit: amending that statement. on second thought, i feel that aslla can work well here, but he needs more support. i think we can make earthbound ladies work. [/troll] as you can see, i agree that the card is bad. its bad because its not chainable. this is really the only reason. my question was why people say its bad "outside of burn". k? comprende you stupid s***?dear god, i wish idiots like you didnt have that picture readily hotlinkable. that one and like 3 others. you wander around these forums looking for people to insult so you can feel better about yourself, and try to fool others into thinking youre charmingly witty. anyone can make a demotivational post. especially one as badly off-form as that. you arent funny and you arent clever and you certainly cant f***ing read. edit:i actually just realized, your demotivational fail at trolling actually further validates my question about why cylinder is better in burn than anywhere else.and then you proceeded to claim that it isnt good in burn either.so you psuedo-contradict yourself because youre attempting to troll. and failing. ot:straightup fortuneladies are alright, but i think we can work with aslla, no? Finally someone who says something smart!! That is the ONLY reason Cylinders isn't good is chainability. But this card is good. All these strong monsters being summoned out because of the invention thus called Synchro's. And you have a trap to deal them back there damage. No, you can't really chain off of it, but you can protect yourself from one of these powerful monsters that are capable of being summoned first turn. Personally, I love Magical Cylinders. The card works great for me. It is a FUN card to play. People think it sucks, so playing it is unexpected. I laugh at them. They get so angry because a "crappy" card just either defeated them or put them in a tough situation. Back on Topic: Fortune Ladies is a fun deck to run, and I think I'm liking the idea of using the EBI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 it does suck. because its unchainable.personally, i hate the card. in a universe where it was chainable, its one of those cards that rewards losing and punishes winning.of course it punishes not being safe, but still.i recall a game where my opponent had me balls to the wall the whole time, until i drew cylinder and managed to turn a game winning attack against itself.i won, but i felt like i hadnt done anything, and had deserved to lose for my inferior deckmaking and dueling ability. this was a while ago, mind you. several years at leasti just dont like it. i'm just wondering why people say it runs better in burn. it seems like it would run equally bad in any deck not using exodia, mill, destiny, countdown, venom, or last turn, as all other decks focus on inflicting damage to reduce your opponents lifepoints to 0. i also dont like people calling it situational. thats like saying drawing a card is situational. people attack almost every turn, its silly to say its not likely to happen. the problem is its unchainability. were it chainable it would be a staple. [/troll] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightningRave Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 Try running Interdimensional Matter Transporter. It will activate Fortune Lady Lighty's effect, on your turn or your opponents turn. Think of the fortune Lady Firey effect on your opponents turn. That would really hurt them especially if he or she just normal summoned a huge creature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just-duelist Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 @ just duelist' date=' maybe you can explain this to me. why can cylinder only be ran in burn?not one person has yet to explain this baffling statement to me.thats like saying roar can only be used in an exodia deck. it seems to me that any deck that would run (i know these are bad) d prison or sakuretsu, which are (theoretically) runnable in any deck that would assume it will be attacked, any deck which could run those would be just as capable of running cylinder, would it not?why does cylinder's burn clause, if that really is the problem, force it to be ran exclusively in burn decks? it doesnt make sense to me.obviously no one runs sakuretsu, d prison (a few people do) or cylinder for the flaw of non-chainability. this i know. and this makes sense. but why would you include a clause stipulating that cylinder can only be run in burn? it doesnt make sense to me. next.. i feel like the aslla should be run in its own deck. it fits nicely here, given the field spell, but thats not really enough to run it, imo. even at one it seems situational and dead drawy. edit: amending that statement. on second thought, i feel that aslla can work well here, but he needs more support. i think we can make earthbound ladies work. [/troll'] i get your point, it could be ran in any deck but its just a bad idea to do so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 well thats just the thing. i know its bad, but it seems conventional at this point to say it's less bad in a burn deck. i want to know why that become the conventional wisdom. and if it's really for no reason, i'd like to rid us of that. it's trolly. [/troll] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cless Alvein Posted September 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 First I would like to say thanks Crimson2432 for the encouragement I simply LOVE these cards! But on about the argument with Magic Cylinder, it can be ran in any deck but it shouldnt I only put it in there cause I cant find a Mirror Force and its one of my favorate Trap cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.