Guest JoshIcy Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 This is exactly the reason why I am sometimes reluctant to issue Warnings. I actually went all out War a good few Months back I went mental about a Permanent 10% lol Just remember that a Moderator's descision is final' date=' sorry you got the bad Stick though Dark.[/quote'] I understand, and I am in no means fighting for these warnings to get removed. The damage has already been done. I am just pointing out some stupidity, and hoping action is taken to fix this stupidity. But I'm not going all Draco and dictating the whole site. It's not my site, now is it? @ Flame Dragon: In no means am I saying Moderating is a job, but you shouldn't involve your personal life with your other responsibilities. 2 things...If you have a better idea to see it all; I'm open ears. Please, spoon feed me your ideas. Second. It depends on the moderator, doesn't it? I'm not trying to dictate this forum. I'm saying that action should be taken so others don't question whether Moderators are corrupt. Comes with the job my friend. Comes with the job.People in some shape or form, will find a reason to heckle us. Well obviously giving a 50% warning for a single spam post is a VIABLE reason to question the Moderators. Questioning a 20% warning for 50 spam posts is NOT VIABLE, therefore you should not be worrying about that. I'll say it again...That post was "Intentional Spamming". I did not have control over the amount.YCMaker and FP do. You take it up with them if you want the base amount lowered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted September 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 This is exactly the reason why I am sometimes reluctant to issue Warnings. I actually went all out War a good few Months back I went mental about a Permanent 10% lol Just remember that a Moderator's descision is final' date=' sorry you got the bad Stick though Dark.[/quote'] I understand, and I am in no means fighting for these warnings to get removed. The damage has already been done. I am just pointing out some stupidity, and hoping action is taken to fix this stupidity. But I'm not going all Draco and dictating the whole site. It's not my site, now is it? @ Flame Dragon: In no means am I saying Moderating is a job, but you shouldn't involve your personal life with your other responsibilities. 2 things...If you have a better idea to see it all; I'm open ears. Please, spoon feed me your ideas. Second. It depends on the moderator, doesn't it? I'm not trying to dictate this forum. I'm saying that action should be taken so others don't question whether Moderators are corrupt. Comes with the job my friend. Comes with the job.People in some shape or form, will find a reason to heckle us. Well obviously giving a 50% warning for a single spam post is a VIABLE reason to question the Moderators. Questioning a 20% warning for 50 spam posts is NOT VIABLE, therefore you should not be worrying about that. I'll say it again...That post was "Intentional Spamming". I did not have control over the amount.YCMaker and FP do. You take it up with them if you want the base amount lowered. Intentional Spamming is 50%, yes, but the amount of spamming needed to receive a warning is at the Moderator's discretion. I don't think 1 spam post should result in such a warning, but that's just me, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 Well' date=' it's partly because you post large quantities where some of the Mods with more questionable histories with dealing with certain situations have jurisdiction. No offense to anyone of course.[/quote'] I understand that, but I always expected Mods to be less corrupt than people like Draco said. Draco was obviously a half-idiot, and I had much faith in the Mods back then. Why should this faith be diminishing? Draco's many things, but he's no idiot. The Mods were pretty damn corrupt back then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted September 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 When I said Draco was a half-idiot, that was supposed to be assumed that I was different back then. I had 110% faith in the Mods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 This is exactly the reason why I am sometimes reluctant to issue Warnings. I actually went all out War a good few Months back I went mental about a Permanent 10% lol Just remember that a Moderator's descision is final' date=' sorry you got the bad Stick though Dark.[/quote'] I understand, and I am in no means fighting for these warnings to get removed. The damage has already been done. I am just pointing out some stupidity, and hoping action is taken to fix this stupidity. But I'm not going all Draco and dictating the whole site. It's not my site, now is it? @ Flame Dragon: In no means am I saying Moderating is a job, but you shouldn't involve your personal life with your other responsibilities. 2 things...If you have a better idea to see it all; I'm open ears. Please, spoon feed me your ideas. Second. It depends on the moderator, doesn't it? I'm not trying to dictate this forum. I'm saying that action should be taken so others don't question whether Moderators are corrupt. Comes with the job my friend. Comes with the job.People in some shape or form, will find a reason to heckle us. Well obviously giving a 50% warning for a single spam post is a VIABLE reason to question the Moderators. Questioning a 20% warning for 50 spam posts is NOT VIABLE, therefore you should not be worrying about that. I'll say it again...That post was "Intentional Spamming". I did not have control over the amount.YCMaker and FP do. You take it up with them if you want the base amount lowered. Intentional Spamming is 50%, yes, but the amount of spamming needed to receive a warning is at the Moderator's discretion. I don't think 1 spam post should result in such a warning, but that's just me, isn't it? Case-by-case.For stuff that can be defined by the warnings system. I use that. @Polaris: Thanks for killing Darks thread. That time is long past, and I don't want it brought up again. Dark feel free to PM me, or otherwise if you wish to continue this discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Its much easier to assign a hefty 4-5 point warning than assigning 2-4 little ones for every post you make. You were getting out of line, with the sexism and making fun of Kitty. Dark, I like to think of you a friend but gosh, grow up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.