Is it just me?

[Huntar!]

I mean' date=' Prince Hunter? What a joke. The guy I made feel as if he wasn't intelligent, suddenly comes along with a new lease on grammar and literate ability, and tries to bestow arrogance because of it?

 

It's liek. lolz.

[/quote']

 

Unneccessary unrelated comment FTW.

 

I mean, 2sick4u? What a joke. The guy comes in like hes all cool poking fun at a me trying to get trolls to agree with him when I come in with a sarcastic comment mocking him and and bestowing my immaturity upon this thread.

 

:D

 

From now on, if someone doesn't have their naughty words censored, I'll give them a warn for mild swearing. :/

[Infinitus]

Things to do:

 

1. You could've been banned because of the normal way you react to warnings, so instead of warning, they ban.

 

2. How does OMGAK react to warnings, and how do you. They may have b& you because of that.

 

If you have behaved yourself, which from what I read on the first page from Hunter is true, than it's probably just you. Don't worry about it, it's not something TO worry about. Just try not to do it.

[Dismal Euphony]

I mean' date=' Prince Hunter? What a joke. The guy I made feel as if he wasn't intelligent, suddenly comes along with a new lease on grammar and literate ability, and tries to bestow arrogance because of it?

 

It's liek. lolz.

[/quote']

 

Unneccessary unrelated comment FTW.

 

I mean, 2sick4u? What a joke. The guy comes in like hes all cool poking fun at a me trying to get trolls to agree with him when I come in with a sarcastic comment mocking him and and bestowing my immaturity upon this thread.

 

:D

 

From now on, if someone doesn't have their naughty words censored, I'll give them a warn for mild swearing. :/

 

I've got a 20% warn for mild spamming and I demand to know what post(s) were "mild spam." >.<

 

No, srsly. I'm stumped. ;\

[2sick4u]

I mean' date=' Prince Hunter? What a joke. The guy I made feel as if he wasn't intelligent, suddenly comes along with a new lease on grammar and literate ability, and tries to bestow arrogance because of it?

 

It's liek. lolz.

[/quote']

 

Unneccessary unrelated comment FTW.

 

I mean, 2sick4u? What a joke. The guy comes in like hes all cool poking fun at a me trying to get trolls to agree with him when I come in with a sarcastic comment mocking him and and bestowing my immaturity upon this thread.

 

:D

 

From now on, if someone doesn't have their naughty words censored, I'll give them a warn for mild swearing. :/

 

If you really see it as more logical for myself to create a topic to bash you, instead of throwing my bashing into an on-topic post where your actions are being questioned, then your Moderating abilities are pretty sublime.

 

Plus. I'm not necessarily poking fun at you, I'm more or less revising your shift in character.

 

But still, you didn't overly mock me. The only thing you mocked was a portion of my opinion, and my coolness. Be proud Hunter, be proud. I'm shattered.

 

However. Even though I doubt you'll enforce that consistently, I commend you for finally reaching a generic conclusion in your pile of impulsive moderation.

[HORUS]

They see me trollin', they hatin'.

 

 

Sorry. Just had an irresistible urge to say that.

[Akira]

We could just start saying Sata Andagi and Timotei in place of swear words, that would solve everything for sure.

[General Assclown]

Just stop f***ing swearing, d***heads ........ Wait 0__0

 

Jokes ^-^

 

But as people said, you can't get banned for a few asterisks after a certain letter. We all know what that person meant but did they say it? No. So therefore they are not eligible for "swearing" thus meaning they can't be banned for "swearing".

 

So, if you get banned for using asterisks as a substitute for swear words, well then, fail Mod.

 

Hunter's an exception though, he's rawrsomz ^-^

 

Edit -

 

Hey OMGAKITTY, looks like we have something in common. I got banned for saying "EPIC FAIL" on some n00bs card even though there was at least a page of the same content in front of mine. Meh, I guess I'm a Mod Magnet :D

[Cyndaquil]

And Princey you forgot to mention OMGAKITTY always learns' date=' he's been banned before and he learns not to do it again. Dark never learns apparently neither do you, Horus.

[/quote']

 

...ohwow

Horus your getting Scolded by a 10 year old who like Kittens,

and harhar, I'm with you bra.

[Womi]

Meh. OMGAK gets warning like everybody else. He just stops when he reaches the limit. And DoP or Dark never knew when to stop. I'm behaving myself worse than I ever ought and wanted to. I always get warnings, although I always wanted to dodge it. But it just won't work. :/ Sooner or later, you do something stupid.

[Mehmani]

And Princey you forgot to mention OMGAKITTY always learns' date=' he's been banned before and he learns not to do it again. Dark never learns apparently neither do you, Horus.

[/quote']

 

Stop spouting Moderation Propaganda. It's like Animal Farm and you're Squealer. Dark and HORUS are epic, so shut it.

 

I am a Marxist, so no "Dark and Horus run a cult and you're in it...." crap. I only support them because they are fighting against incompetent Moderators. Even though "I hate haten" on most Mods (I made a thread apologising to Hunter on behalf of YCM for all the crap he gets once) I must admit, he does make mistakes.

 

About the Cult quote, someone on another site said that I ran an evil cult because I had good grammar.

[Amaterasu]

Is it just me' date=' or is it really true that people who swear in the title beneath their username don't get banned or warned, but I get banned for a few weeks for using a few swear words?

 

It also seems as if, in comparison, I swear much less then people like OMGAK, and yet, OMGAK stays untouched by the banhammer.

 

I'm not bashing OMGAK, here. Just wondering why he can overtly swear and not worry about it, and I get banned for two weeks for dropping an F-bomb.

 

It may just be because the mods like him.

[/quote']

 

I don't know. All I know is I've never been warned and I post profaniteies in about 10% of my posts.

[T. Sankara]

No' date=' it's definitely just you.

[/quote']

[OMGAKITTY]

And Princey you forgot to mention OMGAKITTY always learns' date=' he's been banned before and he learns not to do it again. Dark never learns apparently neither do you, Horus.

[/quote']

 

I forgot to mention this post made me lol. Kitty absolutely fails at judging character. Hunter was closer on target.

 

The only thing I learned from my ban is that having mods on your MSN decreases ban/warn chance by 50%.

[Kitty]

And Princey you forgot to mention OMGAKITTY always learns' date=' he's been banned before and he learns not to do it again. Dark never learns apparently neither do you, Horus.

[/quote']

 

...ohwow

Horus your getting Scolded by a 15 year old who like Kittens,

and harhar, I'm with you bra.

 

 

fixed

[Enrise]

I mean' date=' Prince Hunter? What a joke. The guy I made feel as if he wasn't intelligent, suddenly comes along with a new lease on grammar and literate ability, and tries to bestow arrogance because of it?

 

It's liek. lolz.

[/quote']

 

Unneccessary unrelated comment FTW.

 

I mean, 2sick4u? What a joke. The guy comes in like hes all cool poking fun at a me trying to get trolls to agree with him when I come in with a sarcastic comment mocking him and and bestowing my immaturity upon this thread.

 

:D

 

From now on, if someone doesn't have their naughty words censored, I'll give them a warn for mild swearing. :/

 

What's the warning %?

If it's outrageous, screw the warning.

If it's fine, then don't screw it.

[Huntar!]

If you really see it as more logical for myself to create a topic to bash you' date=' instead of throwing my bashing into an on-topic post where your actions are being questioned, then your Moderating abilities are pretty sublime.

 

Plus. I'm not necessarily poking fun at you, I'm more or less revising your shift in character.

 

But still, you didn't overly mock me. The only thing you mocked was a portion of my opinion, and my coolness. Be proud Hunter, be proud. I'm shattered.

 

However. Even though I doubt you'll enforce that consistently, I commend you for finally reaching a generic conclusion in your pile of impulsive moderation.

[/quote']

 

Thank you.

 

I am a Marxist' date=' so no "Dark and Horus run a cult and you're in it...." crap. I only support them because they are fighting against incompetent Moderators. Even though "I hate haten" on most Mods (I made a thread apologising to Hunter on behalf of YCM for all the crap he gets once) I must admit, he does make mistakes.

[/quote']

 

I make mistakes. I'm not afraid to admit that. I react to PMs that people send me about my actions as long as they aren't rude about it.

 

Thanks

 

I forgot to mention this post made me lol. Kitty absolutely fails at judging character. Hunter was closer on target.

 

The only thing I learned from my ban is that having mods on your MSN decreases ban/warn chance by 50%.

 

Only if you have Icyblue. Which pisses me off how he used to revoke half my warnings and say that "if they did it one more time' date=' its a ban" and blah blah blah. Hes a softy. :/

 

I mean' date=' Prince Hunter? What a joke. The guy I made feel as if he wasn't intelligent, suddenly comes along with a new lease on grammar and literate ability, and tries to bestow arrogance because of it?

 

It's liek. lolz.

[/quote']

 

Unneccessary unrelated comment FTW.

 

I mean, 2sick4u? What a joke. The guy comes in like hes all cool poking fun at a me trying to get trolls to agree with him when I come in with a sarcastic comment mocking him and and bestowing my immaturity upon this thread.

 

:D

 

From now on, if someone doesn't have their naughty words censored, I'll give them a warn for mild swearing. :/

 

What's the warning %?

If it's outrageous, screw the warning.

If it's fine, then don't screw it.

 

Depends on what was said, and how much of it was said. =/

 

If its mild, most of the time I'll overlook it. If its flaming, its a 40% as normal, if its just for the sake of swearing and its alot, probably 3-5 points.

[OMGAKITTY]

I liek how the reason is still "mild spamming" even if the warn is 50-70%

[Huntar!]

I've never given a single warning for 70%.

 

Its a waste of my time to warn you for every little spam post anyone makes. I wait til it accumulates. And its probably for your best interests anyway. I mean, 5 20% warns is a ban while I might give you one 50% warn for every 10 spam posts.

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

If its mild' date=' most of the time I'll overlook it. If its flaming, its a 40% as normal, if its just for the sake of swearing and its alot, probably 3-5 points.

[/quote']

 

Halve those and you'll be good.

 

Hes a softy. :/

 

Incompetence and harshness aren't the same thing. Double standards're either incompetence or malice, and Hanlon's Razor applies here. Incompetence it is.

 

J-Max banning majortim for a week and literally using "because he pisses me off" as an excuse isn't harsh, it's incompetent.

 

Banning Dark for a month and literally using "because he's Dark" as an excuse isn't harsh, it's incompetent.

 

Browarod giving me an initial 6 months because Frlf hotlinked an image and it turned out to be pornographic isn't harsh, it's incompetent.

 

Stating that you'll ban/warn anyone who posts after you do in a section where you have no jurisdiction isn't harsh, it's incompetent.

 

Being harsh is applying a high standard percentage for offenses. Giving either 0% or 80% to your whim for a basic offense like flaming or spamming isn't harsh, it's incompetent. If you're giving random 40%s out of the blue while everyone else, and that's a lot of people, who flames or spams gets 0, that's incompetent.

[Huntar!]

If its mild' date=' most of the time I'll overlook it. If its flaming, its a 40% as normal, if its just for the sake of swearing and its alot, probably 3-5 points.

[/quote']

 

Halve those and you'll be good.

 

Hes a softy. :/

 

Incompetence and harshness aren't the same thing. Double standards're either incompetence or malice' date=' and Hanlon's Razor applies here. Incompetence it is.

 

J-Max banning majortim for a week and literally using "because he pisses me off" as an excuse isn't harsh, it's incompetent.

 

[b']Yeah, it really is.[/b]

 

Banning Dark for a month and literally using "because he's Dark" as an excuse isn't harsh, it's incompetent.

 

He has 2 weeks. :/

 

Stating that you'll ban/warn anyone who posts after you do in a section where you have no jurisdiction isn't harsh, it's incompetent.

 

This is perfectly justifiable. As a moderator you are expected to maintain control of a situation when neccessary.

 

Being harsh is applying a high standard percentage for offenses. Giving either 0% or 80% to your whim for a basic offense like flaming or spamming isn't harsh, it's incompetent. If you're giving random 40%s out of the blue while everyone else, and that's a lot of people, who flames or spams gets 0, that's incompetent.

 

I dont give out single warnings higher than 50%. YCMaker and Falling Pizza made us moderators because they entrusted us to make decisions. Thats what we do.

[OMGAKITTY]

 

 

Stating that you'll ban/warn anyone who posts after you do in a section where you have no jurisdiction isn't harsh' date=' it's incompetent.

 

[b']This is perfectly justifiable. As a moderator you are expected to maintain control of a situation when neccessary.[/b]

 

 

 

As a moderator, you are expected to maintain control of your section. "Spiritual Locking" is nothing more than mini-modding.

[Huntar!]

 

 

Stating that you'll ban/warn anyone who posts after you do in a section where you have no jurisdiction isn't harsh' date=' it's incompetent.

 

[b']This is perfectly justifiable. As a moderator you are expected to maintain control of a situation when neccessary.[/b]

 

 

 

As a moderator, you are expected to maintain control of your section. "Spiritual Locking" is nothing more than mini-modding.

 

No. It isn't. As a moderator, even outside of your section you still have the capabilities to warn and ban. You are expected to be a moderator, even if you cant close a topic or delete posts. Mini-modding is like that, except you can't do a single thing about it.

[OMGAKITTY]

 

 

Stating that you'll ban/warn anyone who posts after you do in a section where you have no jurisdiction isn't harsh' date=' it's incompetent.

 

[b']This is perfectly justifiable. As a moderator you are expected to maintain control of a situation when neccessary.[/b]

 

 

 

As a moderator, you are expected to maintain control of your section. "Spiritual Locking" is nothing more than mini-modding power abuse.

 

No. It isn't. As a moderator, even outside of your section you still have the capabilities to warn and ban. You are expected to be a moderator, even if you cant close a topic or delete posts. Mini-modding is like that, except you can't do a single thing about it.

 

fix'd it just for you Hunter.

[~/Coolio Prime\~]

Atlas was perma'd on October 7th, his birthday, for multiple accounts of unidentifiable "mild spamming". But his preaches however, lived on.

[Kitty]

 

 

Stating that you'll ban/warn anyone who posts after you do in a section where you have no jurisdiction isn't harsh' date=' it's incompetent.

 

[b']This is perfectly justifiable. As a moderator you are expected to maintain control of a situation when neccessary.[/b]

 

 

 

As a moderator, you are expected to maintain control of your section. "Spiritual Locking" is nothing more than mini-modding power abuse.

 

No. It isn't. As a moderator, even outside of your section you still have the capabilities to warn and ban. You are expected to be a moderator, even if you cant close a topic or delete posts. Mini-modding is like that, except you can't do a single thing about it.

 

fix'd it just for you Hunter.

 

i lol'd Power abuse eh?

 

Nah. I disagree, a job is a job, it'd be better if you got paid for banning people. =/ YCMaker should start sending out pay check for the Mods, and good members.

 

And saying that a Mod should stay in his/her section is like saying YCMaker can't go look into one of the forums; it's stupid. Mods can and will go where ever they please.