Jump to content

COTLB Broken?


Recommended Posts

:\

Really? More people complaining about running Lightsworn and wahing because it's too strong?

 

Use a damn side deck. Rai-Oh kills JD' date=' Lumina's Summons, Wulfs and stops COTLB. That's the first suggestion.

[/quote']

 

That's a terrible argument. I really don't feel like explaining why, but if I really must, at the absolute minimum, rather then addressing admitted problems in your game, your only suggestion is for people to play cards that some people wouldn't wish to play in their decks. "Treeborn's ruining the meta!? Rather then banning Treeborn, we're just going to give you the advice of running D.D. Crow!"

 

Simple solutions for the win. Charge of the Light Brigade, hell, even Lightsworn wouldn't be a problem if people would quit playing stupid decks that don't win anyway, and start using a side deck or at least running something to stop the cards they hate rather than demanding that they be banned if they aren't banworthy. There are some cards that we just too powerful and had to be banned, while some give a huge advantage to a player and continue to do so because people don't play well enough to survive against them.

 

I don't even know how to reply to this without insulting you....


:\

Really? More people complaining about running Lightsworn and wahing because it's too strong?

 

Use a damn side deck. Rai-Oh kills JD' date=' Lumina's Summons, Wulfs and stops COTLB. That's the first suggestion.

[/quote']

 

LOLOLOLOL Rai-Oh can't stop Wulf and Lumina summons. u silly noob.

 

Siding Light-Imprisoning Mirror or Skill Drain is enough to hurt LS.

 

D-Fissure also helps since the LS playing wilt just side in Royal Decree/Trap Eater because they expect LIM

 

D-Fissure is rly only a good anti-LS side in GB.

And Anti Meta. I tried them, and they worked really well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are saying that SJC was full of idiot players who played bad decks and didn't use a side deck? A side deck helps' date=' but there is a reason 9 of the top 16 were LS and there is a reason LS made it to the top 4. The deck does take some skill so that you can make it work when you are getting bad mills or bad hands, but the second you get 4 LS w/ different names in the grave it's pretty much auto-pilot win. Just because you side doesn't mean you will win.

[/quote']

Let's see, the 9 of the top 16 were LS because alot of people played LS, and nearly everyone there played LS except for a few remote players who ran Glads and...something to do with birds. And look at what happened, they still didn't win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are saying that SJC was full of idiot players who played bad decks and didn't use a side deck? A side deck helps' date=' but there is a reason 9 of the top 16 were LS and there is a reason LS made it to the top 4. The deck does take some skill so that you can make it work when you are getting bad mills or bad hands, but the second you get 4 LS w/ different names in the grave it's pretty much auto-pilot win. Just because you side doesn't mean you will win.

[/quote']

Let's see, the 9 of the top 16 were LS because alot of people played LS, and nearly everyone there played LS except for a few remote players who ran Glads and...something to do with birds. And look at what happened, they still didn't win.

 

And why is that? Maybe because its a win condition is broken? Duh alot of people are going to run a deck with a broken easy to summon win condition that does not take that much skill to play. If you don't see the problem with that there is something wrong with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...