Hunting is bad

[Womi]

-raisesflameshield-

 

It is an attack on Hunter' date=' or mods really.

 

He's pointing out that the mods are banning people for no reason(or members that they dislike, Ie: trolls/indirectrolls(?)) other than actually banning them for a good reason.

 

Or,

 

He's pointing out that hunters are killing animals for no reason(or animals that they dislike, Ie: Wolves/Bears) other than hunting them for food.

 

Not sure if I explained it properly. D:

 

Note: This explanation is for noobs members who don't get it.

 

already pointed that out.

 

Didn't go in detail.

 

D:

 

excuses.

[OMGAKITTY]

I don't see how anyone can construe this as an attack on mods. I am simply stating my opinion on hunters.

[Admiral Tim]

for once you are right, why kill innocent animals, i like pigs so i rarely eat them, but i love to eat moose

[OMGAKITTY]

for once you are right' date=' why kill innocent animals, i like pigs so i rarely eat them, but i love to eat moose

[/quote']

 

So moose (mooses? Meese?) are less innocent than pigs?

[Womi]

I don't see how anyone can construe this as an attack on mods. I am simply stating my opinion on hunters.

 

of course. Of course....

[Cyber Altair]

Hunter is a bad mod.

[~/Coolio Prime\~]

I got my Hunter license yesterday. I am in search of my father, who is a master Hunter.

[Kitty]

I think hunting is bad. There's really no more need to hunt' date=' now that we have domesticated animals like cows for food. I think that hunters just like the feeling of power shooting an animal for no good reason gives them. I think hunters are stupid.

 

Discuss hunting and hunters.

[/quote']

 

Huntung is awesome. It helps keep the population of one species down so they won't overload the enviroment. Also hunting is good to calm ones nerves.

 

Want evidence here it is:

http://www.uga.edu/srel/ecoviews/ecoview031117.htm

 

And although I do not Hunt because of my fear of guns, my parents do.

 

and FYI: Hunter is a great mod.

[fenrir]

I think hunting is bad. There's really no more need to hunt' date=' now that we have domesticated animals like cows for food. I think that hunters just like the feeling of power shooting an animal for no good reason gives them. I think hunters are stupid.

 

Discuss hunting and hunters.

[/quote']

 

Huntung is awesome. It helps keep the population of one species down so they won't overload the enviroment. Also hunting is good to calm ones nerves.

 

Want evidence here it is:

http://www.uga.edu/srel/ecoviews/ecoview031117.htm

 

And although I do not Hunt because of my fear of guns, my parents do.

 

and FYI: Hunter is great in bed.

 

Wait, wut?

[Kitty]

I think hunting is bad. There's really no more need to hunt' date=' now that we have domesticated animals like cows for food. I think that hunters just like the feeling of power shooting an animal for no good reason gives them. I think hunters are stupid.

 

Discuss hunting and hunters.

[/quote']

 

Huntung is awesome. It helps keep the population of one species down so they won't overload the enviroment. Also hunting is good to calm ones nerves.

 

Want evidence here it is:

http://www.uga.edu/srel/ecoviews/ecoview031117.htm

 

And although I do not Hunt because of my fear of guns, my parents do.

 

and FYI: Hunter is great in bed.

 

Wait, wut?

 

>.> Yeah i didn't tell ya? OMIGOSH I FORGOT. lolidiot. We live a couple of hundred miles apart. Yeah i slept with the guy. [/sarcasm]

[Altαir]

Hunting keeps some homo-thingy in place and at a decent level.

 

But I hate civilivation to an extent. Civilization is forcing the animals to have less room, and be more likely to travel through other's homes, or on the road.

[Eury]

Hunting to keep a population balanced or to feed your family is perfectly fine. To hunt just to kill things for your own entertainment is just cruel. Ex. Seal Clubbing.

[CrumbsuckerCommutard]

Hunting is completely useless now. I can't argue. I'm vegan.

[Prada]

Hunter is a bad mod.

 

Q4T

 

and FYI: Hunter is a great mod.

 

LOL

 

>.> Yeah i didn't tell ya? OMIGOSH I FORGOT. lolidiot. We live a couple of hundred miles apart. Yeah i slept with the guy. [/sarcasm]

 

Cybersex counts.

[Juuzou]

for once you are right' date=' why kill innocent animals, i like pigs so i rarely eat them, but i love to eat moose

[/quote']

 

So moose (mooses? Meese?) are less innocent than pigs?

 

MOOSEN

 

OT:

 

i agree. hunting is horrible

[~/Coolio Prime\~]

kitty blindly supports hunting out of fear for the hunters and their guns they are not afraid to use when necessary. ignorant hunters have even killed some rangers trying to get them to stop killing innocent animals at times

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

kitty blindly supports hunting out of fear for the hunters and their guns they are not afraid to use when necessary. ignorant hunters have even killed some rangers trying to get them to stop killing innocent animals at times

 

DUDE THATS DANGEROUS TALK R YOU TRYING TO GET US KILLED? O_O_O_O_O

[-Berserker-]

Hunter X Hunter was a good anime (I only watched 1 episode, so I'm not actually sure of that).

We need to hunt animals that we introduced ourselves at other habitats, like the toads in Australia or humans in Antartica.

[~/Coolio Prime\~]

Hunter X Hunter was a good anime (I only watched 1 episode' date=' so I'm not actually sure of that).

[/quote']

I got my Hunter license yesterday. I am in search of my father' date=' who is a master Hunter.

[/quote']

 

 

 

beat you to the chase there buddy

[The Nightmare Anatomy]

 

is sad with this topic.

[Amethyst Phoenix]

Hunting provides food for people, and regulates the population. For example, if deer were not hunted their population would explode. With the large amounts of deer, all the grass etc that deer eat would quickly be eaten up, due to the fierce competition over a suddenly strained food supply. Now the deer get to die a slow painful death from starvation, and more will perish than if we had simply gone out and killed some.

 

This then causes that whole food chain imbalance effect. So expanding upon the deer scenario, the wolves that eat them would have no food, and then the wolves would starve and die. This would also cause the rabbit population ( and other animals wolves eat) to grow out of control and repeat the deer scenario. Also, what minuscule amount of regulation the wolves were providing after the deer population boom would vanish.

 

On the off chance there's something present in this example's ecosystem that preys on wolves, it would die off much the same way the wolves did.

 

 

In addition, hunting is not mindless killing: everything is perfectly planned out by the fish and wildlife services so that we only kill enough deer to keep them under control. You know there's this fancy thing called a limit? You should learn what it means, it's a blasty blast.

 

Contrary to popular, disney spoon-fed belief, the majority of the animals we hunt do not have families, nor can they experience complex emotions. Fear and contentment on the basest scale imaginable is all a deer can fathom. They operate solely on instinct. Ironically enough, the same people that made the bambi movie that radical environmentalists enjoy throwing out so often also made a movie called The Lion King. I suggest you go watch that, and pay particular attention to the circle of life concept. Even the authors of the work you use as one of your primary weapons in this argument know better.

 

There's also the fact that a bullet is relatively painless to them. It's not like we're clubbing them to death or slitting their throats like the pigs you buy from the grocery store.

 

 

Also, school shooting etc are not linked to video games, they're the result of a combination of idiot parents who cannot properly educate or pay attention to their children and severe mental and emotional issues either due to a mental illness or their peers being brutal asshats to them. Video games are also becoming rather widespread, to the point that this becomes as silly as saying wearing a hat or playing sports caused them to do it. Video games are merely the media's favorite and most convenient scapegoat to cover up poor parenting. God forbid people have flaws; to save their self esteem we must demonize a hobby enough people are uninformed about that they'll believe any bullshit we spew!

 

 

Also, about those rangers. It's illegal to interfere with hunters hunting, so technically they were stupidly breaking the law they're supposed to be upholding, and died to a stupid mistake resulting in an accident. How the hell they became rangers when they're idiotic enough to run in front a gun aimed at a creature it's perfectly legal to kill is beyond me.

 

Also, Kitty said she doesn't hunt because she's afraid of guns, not because hunters are using scare tactics or winning her support via fear. Don't twist her words around like some idiotic reporter.

 

 

tl;dr version: You're all uninformed idiots who are whining about things you don't understand in the least, under the banner of morals you're not even upholding via said whining.

 

On the somewhat likely chance this really is some fail attempt at subtly insulting Prince Hunter, I advise you to get a life and stop poking the metaphorical bear >_>

[Eury]

Hunting provides food for people' date=' and regulates the population. For example, if deer were not hunted their population would explode. With the large amounts of deer, all the grass etc that deer eat would quickly be eaten up, due to the fierce competition over a suddenly strained food supply. Now the deer get to die a slow painful death from starvation, and more will perish than if we had simply gone out and killed some.

 

This then causes that whole food chain imbalance effect. So expanding upon the deer scenario, the wolves that eat them would have no food, and then the wolves would starve and die. This would also cause the rabbit population ( and other animals wolves eat) to grow out of control and repeat the deer scenario. Also, what minuscule amount of regulation the wolves were providing after the deer population boom would vanish.

 

On the off chance there's something present in this example's ecosystem that preys on wolves, it would die off much the same way the wolves did.

 

 

In addition, hunting is not mindless killing: everything is perfectly planned out by the fish and wildlife services so that we only kill enough deer to keep them under control. You know there's this fancy thing called a limit? You should learn what it means, it's a blasty blast.

 

Contrary to popular, disney spoon-fed belief, the majority of the animals we hunt do not have families, nor can they experience complex emotions. Fear and contentment on the basest scale imaginable is all a deer can fathom. They operate solely on instinct. Ironically enough, the same people that made the bambi movie that radical environmentalists enjoy throwing out so often also made a movie called The Lion King. I suggest you go watch that, and pay particular attention to the circle of life concept. Even the authors of the work you use as one of your primary weapons in this argument know better.

 

There's also the fact that a bullet is relatively painless to them. It's not like we're clubbing them to death or slitting their throats like the pigs you buy from the grocery store.

 

 

Also, school shooting etc are not linked to video games, they're the result of a combination of idiot parents who cannot properly educate or pay attention to their children and severe mental and emotional issues either due to a mental illness or their peers being brutal asshats to them. Video games are also becoming rather widespread, to the point that this becomes as silly as saying wearing a hat or playing sports caused them to do it. Video games are merely the media's favorite and most convenient scapegoat to cover up poor parenting. God forbid people have flaws; to save their self esteem we must demonize a hobby enough people are uninformed about that they'll believe any bullshit we spew!

 

 

Also, about those rangers. It's illegal to interfere with hunters hunting, so technically they were stupidly breaking the law they're supposed to be upholding, and died to a stupid mistake resulting in an accident. How the hell they became rangers when they're idiotic enough to run in front a gun aimed at a creature it's perfectly legal to kill is beyond me.

 

Also, Kitty said she doesn't hunt because she's afraid of guns, not because hunters are using scare tactics or winning her support via fear. Don't twist her words around like some idiotic reporter.

 

 

tl;dr version: You're all uninformed idiots who are whining about things you don't understand in the least, under the banner of morals you're not even upholding via said whining.

 

On the somewhat likely chance this really is some fail attempt at subtly insulting Prince Hunter, I advise you to get a life and stop poking the metaphorical bear >_>

[/quote']

THANK YOU! +1

[~/Coolio Prime\~]

Hunting provides food for people' date=' and regulates the population. For example, if deer were not hunted their population would explode. With the large amounts of deer, all the grass etc that deer eat would quickly be eaten up, due to the fierce competition over a suddenly strained food supply. Now the deer get to die a slow painful death from starvation, and more will perish than if we had simply gone out and killed some.

[/quote']

Wrong, without hunting the population of deer would stay where it was. Humans are the ones that overpopulated, and we're wiping out all the other species because there's way too much of us to feed. The deer hunters kill 90% of the time for game, not to play God with population control. People talking about that crap should realize that we ourselves should be limiting ourselves to 2 children per couple so that we can slowly decrease population wise. Otherwise we'll be the ones you talked about going through a slow death via starvation.

 

This then causes that whole food chain imbalance effect. So expanding upon the deer scenario, the wolves that eat them would have no food, and then the wolves would starve and die. This would also cause the rabbit population ( and other animals wolves eat) to grow out of control and repeat the deer scenario. Also, what minuscule amount of regulation the wolves were providing after the deer population boom would vanish.

 

On the off chance there's something present in this example's ecosystem that preys on wolves, it would die off much the same way the wolves did.

…Yeah, this is pretty much describing the impact the hunters will have on the ecosystem. >_>

 

In addition, hunting is not mindless killing: everything is perfectly planned out by the fish and wildlife services so that we only kill enough deer to keep them under control. You know there's this fancy thing called a limit? You should learn what it means, it's a blasty blast.

It shouldn't be done in the first place, and as I said it isn't needed. National Parks do just fine without hunters. And when a hunter kills the head of a pack, all of the deer will die. Go figure.

 

Contrary to popular, disney spoon-fed belief, the majority of the animals we hunt do not have families, nor can they experience complex emotions. Fear and contentment on the basest scale imaginable is all a deer can fathom. They operate solely on instinct. Ironically enough, the same people that made the bambi movie that radical environmentalists enjoy throwing out so often also made a movie called The Lion King. I suggest you go watch that, and pay particular attention to the circle of life concept. Even the authors of the work you use as one of your primary weapons in this argument know better.

You do know Disney doesn't have the same staff for everything, and that anyone using Bambi as a reference was most likely kidding, right? >.>

 

There's also the fact that a bullet is relatively painless to them. It's not like we're clubbing them to death or slitting their throats like the pigs you buy from the grocery store.

I went out and shot some people today. I didn't stab them though so it's all good.

 

Also, school shooting etc are not linked to video games, they're the result of a combination of idiot parents who cannot properly educate or pay attention to their children and severe mental and emotional issues either due to a mental illness or their peers being brutal asshats to them. Video games are also becoming rather widespread, to the point that this becomes as silly as saying wearing a hat or playing sports caused them to do it. Video games are merely the media's favorite and most convenient scapegoat to cover up poor parenting. God forbid people have flaws; to save their self esteem we must demonize a hobby enough people are uninformed about that they'll believe any bullshit we spew!

I agree with this to an extent. It isn't always poor parenting though and it isn't never the result of video games. The reasons for shootings vary. But this topic is really unrelated, so whatever.

 

Also, about those rangers. It's illegal to interfere with hunters hunting, so technically they were stupidly breaking the law they're supposed to be upholding, and died to a stupid mistake resulting in an accident. How the hell they became rangers when they're idiotic enough to run in front a gun aimed at a creature it's perfectly legal to kill is beyond me.

LOL

 

They were telling hunters to stop killing off endangered species(or population control, as you wish to call it). And the hunters going to their houses and shooting them isn't exactly them jumping in front of a bullet. Shut up.

 

Also, Kitty said she doesn't hunt because she's afraid of guns, not because hunters are using scare tactics or winning her support via fear. Don't twist her words around like some idiotic reporter.

You obviously missed what that part of my sentence really meant. Responding is pointless.

 

tl;dr version: You're all uninformed idiots who are whining about things you don't understand in the least, under the banner of morals you're not even upholding via said whining.

tl;dr version: You're an elitist idiot who thinks hunters are some sort of Keystone predator in environments that did just fine without them and should consider learning about topics before making a giant rant of stupidity about it.

 

On the somewhat likely chance this really is some fail attempt at subtly insulting Prince Hunter, I advise you to get a life and stop poking the metaphorical bear >_>

This jab at Hunter wasn't exactly fail and one could easily assume OMG is far better off socially than Hunter. Just super saiyan.

[OMGAKITTY]

Hunting provides food for people' date=' and regulates the population. For example, if deer were not hunted their population would explode. With the large amounts of deer, all the grass etc that deer eat would quickly be eaten up, due to the fierce competition over a suddenly strained food supply. Now the deer get to die a slow painful death from starvation, and more will perish than if we had simply gone out and killed some.

[/quote']

Wrong, without hunting the population of deer would stay where it was. Humans are the ones that overpopulated, and we're wiping out all the other species because there's way too much of us to feed. The deer hunters kill 90% of the time for game, not to play God with population control. People talking about that crap should realize that we ourselves should be limiting ourselves to 2 children per couple so that we can slowly decrease population wise. Otherwise we'll be the ones you talked about going through a slow death via starvation.

 

This then causes that whole food chain imbalance effect. So expanding upon the deer scenario, the wolves that eat them would have no food, and then the wolves would starve and die. This would also cause the rabbit population ( and other animals wolves eat) to grow out of control and repeat the deer scenario. Also, what minuscule amount of regulation the wolves were providing after the deer population boom would vanish.

 

On the off chance there's something present in this example's ecosystem that preys on wolves, it would die off much the same way the wolves did.

…Yeah, this is pretty much describing the impact the hunters will have on the ecosystem. >_>

 

In addition, hunting is not mindless killing: everything is perfectly planned out by the fish and wildlife services so that we only kill enough deer to keep them under control. You know there's this fancy thing called a limit? You should learn what it means, it's a blasty blast.

It shouldn't be done in the first place, and as I said it isn't needed. National Parks do just fine without hunters. And when a hunter kills the head of a pack, all of the deer will die. Go figure.

 

Contrary to popular, disney spoon-fed belief, the majority of the animals we hunt do not have families, nor can they experience complex emotions. Fear and contentment on the basest scale imaginable is all a deer can fathom. They operate solely on instinct. Ironically enough, the same people that made the bambi movie that radical environmentalists enjoy throwing out so often also made a movie called The Lion King. I suggest you go watch that, and pay particular attention to the circle of life concept. Even the authors of the work you use as one of your primary weapons in this argument know better.

You do know Disney doesn't have the same staff for everything, and that anyone using Bambi as a reference was most likely kidding, right? >.>

 

There's also the fact that a bullet is relatively painless to them. It's not like we're clubbing them to death or slitting their throats like the pigs you buy from the grocery store.

I went out and shot some people today. I didn't stab them though so it's all good.

 

Also, school shooting etc are not linked to video games, they're the result of a combination of idiot parents who cannot properly educate or pay attention to their children and severe mental and emotional issues either due to a mental illness or their peers being brutal asshats to them. Video games are also becoming rather widespread, to the point that this becomes as silly as saying wearing a hat or playing sports caused them to do it. Video games are merely the media's favorite and most convenient scapegoat to cover up poor parenting. God forbid people have flaws; to save their self esteem we must demonize a hobby enough people are uninformed about that they'll believe any bullshit we spew!

I agree with this to an extent. It isn't always poor parenting though and it isn't never the result of video games. The reasons for shootings vary. But this topic is really unrelated, so whatever.

 

Also, about those rangers. It's illegal to interfere with hunters hunting, so technically they were stupidly breaking the law they're supposed to be upholding, and died to a stupid mistake resulting in an accident. How the hell they became rangers when they're idiotic enough to run in front a gun aimed at a creature it's perfectly legal to kill is beyond me.

LOL

 

They were telling hunters to stop killing off endangered species(or population control, as you wish to call it). And the hunters going to their houses and shooting them isn't exactly them jumping in front of a bullet. Shut up.

 

Also, Kitty said she doesn't hunt because she's afraid of guns, not because hunters are using scare tactics or winning her support via fear. Don't twist her words around like some idiotic reporter.

You obviously missed what that part of my sentence really meant. Responding is pointless.

 

tl;dr version: You're all uninformed idiots who are whining about things you don't understand in the least, under the banner of morals you're not even upholding via said whining.

tl;dr version: You're an elitist idiot who thinks hunters are some sort of Keystone predator in environments that did just fine without them and should consider learning about topics before making a giant rant of stupidity about it.

 

On the somewhat likely chance this really is some fail attempt at subtly insulting Prince Hunter, I advise you to get a life and stop poking the metaphorical bear >_>

This jab at Hunter wasn't exactly fail and one could easily assume OMG is far better off socially than Hunter. Just super saiyan.

 

THANK YOU! +1

[Womi]

Hunting provides food for people' date=' and regulates the population. For example, if deer were not hunted their population would explode. With the large amounts of deer, all the grass etc that deer eat would quickly be eaten up, due to the fierce competition over a suddenly strained food supply. Now the deer get to die a slow painful death from starvation, and more will perish than if we had simply gone out and killed some.

 

This then causes that whole food chain imbalance effect. So expanding upon the deer scenario, the wolves that eat them would have no food, and then the wolves would starve and die. This would also cause the rabbit population ( and other animals wolves eat) to grow out of control and repeat the deer scenario. Also, what minuscule amount of regulation the wolves were providing after the deer population boom would vanish.

 

On the off chance there's something present in this example's ecosystem that preys on wolves, it would die off much the same way the wolves did.

 

 

In addition, hunting is not mindless killing: everything is perfectly planned out by the fish and wildlife services so that we only kill enough deer to keep them under control. You know there's this fancy thing called a limit? You should learn what it means, it's a blasty blast.

 

Contrary to popular, disney spoon-fed belief, the majority of the animals we hunt do not have families, nor can they experience complex emotions. Fear and contentment on the basest scale imaginable is all a deer can fathom. They operate solely on instinct. Ironically enough, the same people that made the bambi movie that radical environmentalists enjoy throwing out so often also made a movie called The Lion King. I suggest you go watch that, and pay particular attention to the circle of life concept. Even the authors of the work you use as one of your primary weapons in this argument know better.

 

There's also the fact that a bullet is relatively painless to them. It's not like we're clubbing them to death or slitting their throats like the pigs you buy from the grocery store.

 

 

Also, school shooting etc are not linked to video games, they're the result of a combination of idiot parents who cannot properly educate or pay attention to their children and severe mental and emotional issues either due to a mental illness or their peers being brutal asshats to them. Video games are also becoming rather widespread, to the point that this becomes as silly as saying wearing a hat or playing sports caused them to do it. Video games are merely the media's favorite and most convenient scapegoat to cover up poor parenting. God forbid people have flaws; to save their self esteem we must demonize a hobby enough people are uninformed about that they'll believe any bullshit we spew!

 

 

Also, about those rangers. It's illegal to interfere with hunters hunting, so technically they were stupidly breaking the law they're supposed to be upholding, and died to a stupid mistake resulting in an accident. How the hell they became rangers when they're idiotic enough to run in front a gun aimed at a creature it's perfectly legal to kill is beyond me.

 

Also, Kitty said she doesn't hunt because she's afraid of guns, not because hunters are using scare tactics or winning her support via fear. Don't twist her words around like some idiotic reporter.

 

 

tl;dr version: You're all uninformed idiots who are whining about things you don't understand in the least, under the banner of morals you're not even upholding via said whining.

 

On the somewhat likely chance this really is some fail attempt at subtly insulting Prince Hunter, I advise you to get a life and stop poking the metaphorical bear >_>

[/quote']

 

tl;dr

Read only the first and last lines. I liked 'em.