Ikeinator Posted October 20, 2009 Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 Please Rate and Comment. [ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozen Judgment Posted October 20, 2009 Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 You used a real card pic... This is extremely OP. Few OCG errors for a new member though. 5/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikeinator Posted October 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 You used a real card pic... This is extremely OP. Few OCG errors for a new member though. 5/10. Sorry.... I didn't know 3600 ATK was considered OP...Unless you saw my draft. That had 4600 ATK. That was just a typo.Anyway, what card already used this pic? I was unaware that it was a real card pic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Immortal Chaos Posted October 20, 2009 Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 You used a real card pic... This is extremely OP. Few OCG errors for a new member though. 5/10. Sorry.... I didn't know 3600 ATK was considered OP...Unless you saw my draft. That had 4600 ATK. That was just a typo.Anyway' date=' what card already used this pic? I was unaware that it was a real card pic.[/quote'] Red-Eyes Darkness Dragon was the original card who used this pic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozen Judgment Posted October 20, 2009 Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 You used a real card pic... This is extremely OP. Few OCG errors for a new member though. 5/10. Sorry.... I didn't know 3600 ATK was considered OP...Unless you saw my draft. That had 4600 ATK. That was just a typo.Anyway' date=' what card already used this pic? I was unaware that it was a real card pic.[/quote'] Yes, I saw 4900. It's good that you changed it but it's still a lot... Maybe 3000-3500 should be a right amount. Red eyes darkness dragon uses this pic. Also, maybe make a more creative effect for this card. 6/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted October 20, 2009 Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 Image is from a card that already exists. OCG errors. Possibly OPed. Two types. 2.8/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spenstar Posted October 20, 2009 Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 It should be Dragon Only. 3600 and the effect is balanced considering the fact that this card needs a fusion monster as one of its fusion materials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wirespy Posted October 20, 2009 Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 You need to fix a lot of things in your card, take advice from posts above.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 So, we use Polymerisation, then we use it again?Fake Types = GoodMultiple Types = Bad8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 Ok.First, thats Red-Eyes Darkness Dragon. Try and replace the Pic ASAP.Second, 3600 Attack is unrealistic, drop it to 3000.Third, a monster can only have two types if it states it in the card effect. So, remove a type.Fourth, effect is really op'ed. Add some drawbacks to balance it.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 this is Red Eyes Darkness Dragon's pic As for the effect, it's very OPed but at least the OCG is good 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.