Mindscatter Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 [spoiler=Lore]This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. It can only be Special Summoned by Tributing all monsters you control. This card gains the appropriate effect based on the number of monsters Tributed for it's Special Summon:- 0: Destroy this card during the End Phase of your next turn.- 1: This card is considered a Normal Monster while face-up on the field.- 2: This card deals piercing damage. If this card is selected as an attack target, you can tribute 1 monster you control to negate the attack.- 3: Double the Battle Damage dealt by this card. This card cannot attack directly. Increase the ATK of all monsters you control (excepting this card) by 500.- 4: This card cannot be destroyed by battle. Once per turn, you can destroy 1 monster your opponent controls. If this card is destroyed by a card effect, you can put it back into your hand.- 5: When this card is summoned, destroy all cards your opponent controls. Once per turn, by paying 1000 Life Points, you can destroy all cards your opponent controls. If you do so, this card cannot attack. If this card is sent to the Graveyard, you can Special Summon it during your Standby Phase. If this card is Special Summoned this way, it gains effect "2". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 Minor ocg errors. Pic is ok but i hate the name. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted October 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 What's wrong with the name? Is it a cliche? Or a kitsch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blamonchesix Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 Give it a more intimidating name. A little OP but still good. 8/10. (^_^) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Red Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 I think the 0 tribute thing rather should halve the original ATK or something. The current drawback for that one is too low considering how easy it is to summon.maybe change the 1 tribute thing to something more interesting as well.. idk :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted October 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 That is something I cannot do. A 1 tribute 2000 ATK monster that special summons cannot have an effect. It would be too strong...but too weak to add a drawback. And about the 0 thing, I designed this card so that it always has 2000 ATK. But I can nerf the effect. Wait a sec... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 ive seen longer effects tbh, i written long effects, so long i had to cut the effect because the card wouldnt load -.-but anyways, on topic.effect is interesting.there are minor ocg errors, just caps errors and other basic grammatical errors.i feel as its already balanced as it is, so id leave it. 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted October 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 Yup, it is just long for me. I only made 2 longer effects so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 OCG error detectedThis monster cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. I think so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted October 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 no, you must say card. ALWAYS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 a little on the OPed end. Personally I dislike the card name 7.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 I wonder what's wrong with the card name? Maybe it would be better as Bllod monk" or somethni, anyway, yeah, it's a bit OP'd. almost borderline. 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.