Daisuke28 Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Hello Everyone! Well, About this deck, I Tried it in my Local, and always, when i get close to winning, I lose, I have no idea what may be missing in it, so i would actually need some help Monsters 3 x Magical Exemplar3 x Nights End Sorcerer3 x Breaker3 x Gravekeeper Spy's3 x Defender2 x Lyla2 x Tricky2 x Chaos Sorcerer Spells:3 x Secret Village of the Spellcasters3 x Shrink3 x Book of moon2 x Allure2 x Lightning Vortex2 x Magical Dimension1 x Pot of avarice1 x Swords1 x Brain Control1 x Heavy Storm Traps:3 x Royal decree1 x Mirror Synchro: Tempest, arcanite... Please suggest, because I really don't know what it may be missing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetsumei75 Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 My suggestion would be to neg the Pot of Avarice, and one Shrink for two Terraforming. That way, you get your Secret Village's faster. Maybe add in a Kycoo or two also. Maybe drop a Defender, or two for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daisuke28 Posted October 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Ok, But The reason I wouldn't do that, is because there snit a lot of light monsters, so if I take defenders, I pretty much decrease my ability to bring chaos Thanks for the suggestion! =3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetsumei75 Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 But you'd still have Lyla, one Defender, and any Arcanite Magicians that got destroyed. So there should be enough LIGHTS for it even if you drop a Defender or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_SuperDude__ Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 I'd drop a defender and a gravekeeper's spy, add a Magical Cyliders and a sakuretsu armor.Make you less vulnerable, ya know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daisuke28 Posted October 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 But that will be such an un even numbers between magic and traps, Thanks anyways =3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabber2033 Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 -1 Vortex+1 Terraforming DO NOT ADD MAGIC CYLINDER!!!. It's horrible outside of burn decks. And Sak-Armor is outclassed by Mirror Force, Torrential Tribute, Bottomless TH, and Dimensional Prison. There are so many better cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Jinzo would be pretty funny here. So would Terraforming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_SuperDude__ Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 eh, all I know is I got a spellcaster deck and Sak-armor and Mag cylinders kick all of my friends behinds. Also, my friend Matt says Chaos sorcerer is limited so I can only have one in my deck. Is that true? I'll have to beat his skinny white butt if he's lyin to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 You probably want to run 2 village and 1 terraforming.. it's better then 3 village because of the extra deck thinning and more spell counters.I'm iffy on 3 defender... Endymion would work with exemplar, even without citadel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabber2033 Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 eh' date=' all I know is I got a spellcaster deck and Sak-armor and Mag cylinders kick all of my friends behinds. Also, my friend Matt says Chaos sorcerer is limited so I can only have one in my deck. Is that true? I'll have to beat his skinny white butt if he's lyin to me.[/quote'] Matt is wrong. Chaos Sorc is SEMI-LIMITED. You can have 2. He needs to read the Ban List. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.