SmallieBigs Posted November 7, 2009 Report Share Posted November 7, 2009 One reason I rate low when somebody makes a vanilla is there is not enough description for example here's how I would rate a vanilla. EXAMPLE #1: This creature can jump over buildings. RATE: what the crap no flavour text 0/10EXAMPLE #2: This creature can bound over skyscrapers with single leaps. When it attacks people scream with fear in it's tall magnifecnt shadow. Wooo! Flavour text 5/10 Another thing is if it's a single vannila I still will rate low vanilla's need support or else they're a bump on a log so vannilas' go in sets not single cards. So you have to make beefy descriptions and beefy support that's how you get a high rate on a vanilla OR ask bringerofcake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 No seriously' date=' I don't find a reason to hate Vanillas, you guys give the worst excuses to hate Vanillas. I'm serious. I mean, don't hate stuff for being "Boring" or "Useless" You call Blue-Eyes Ultimate Boring? Ya know something, some REAL Vanillas don't have support. Like Snapesnatch, or- wait, what's the name? Anyways, I know the answer is no different from why people hate dull effects. Sometimes, people hate both Fake Types and Vanillas. IMO, Everyone should like either, or like both. Hating both = Bad.[/quote'] Blue Eyes Ultimate is a 4500 beatstick that's easier than hell to summon and has a ton of support. Find me another vanilla like that and I'll call BEUD boring. People hate Fake-Types cause people always post them in Realistic. Realistic is for cards that could actually be made into real cards. Vanillas are bad and boring w/out support. If people would just make support for them we wouldn't have threads like this. Blue eyes White Dragon is the one with support.Blue eyes Ultimate is the one without, besides its high ATK and DEF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.