Aqua Girl Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Ahh I see Well Where Did I go rong? What did I mess up on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 First of all your opponent can't take damage from attacking a monster that has 0 ATK.As for the second part"When this card is attacked, increase your Life Points by the amount of damage inflicted on your opponent." Which of course is unaffected by this effce since it can only be damage by a monster with ATK so the effect is useless.Thats why the DEF doesn't match the level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua Girl Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 My card dosent say that, it says "would have taken". Like your opponet has to attack your defence position monster at instead you gan they dont lose, so you need to use battle mainia? Shuld I post the Lore?Heres the lore. Your opponet takes no dammage when attacking this monster. When this card is attacked you gain Life Points equal to the amount your opponet would have taken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Your opponet takes no dammage when attacking this monster. When this card is attacked you gain Life Points equal to the damage you inflicted to your opponent. Thing is when a monster is in DEF then the attack and defender don't take LP damage thus your effect is useless.The first part is useless unless your monster has ATK to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua Girl Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Hee Hee your not geting it.... That part was so toyr oponet.......... You know you gave me an idea brb, but yes the bold did make sence I agree.It my not seam that way but I dont arugh to win Especialy against a superior, I do it to learn, I want it to be that the oponet dosent take Dammage Healers rarely attack XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enma Kozato Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 i see how it works the effect is for when the card is in Defense position if the attacking monster had lower ATK that this cardds DEF instead of opponent taking damage she recieves the iniial damage as an LP boost actually its pretty good if you can boost its DEFYes my warning has expired Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua Girl Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Yes Thats what I was geting at. It was sorta difcult to eplain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Well if yours did then so did mine.Also Aqua Girl its good that you want to learn but if you had explained what the effect was supposed to be I could have given you the proper OCG like so. "When this card is attacked by a monster with fewer ATK than this card's DEF, increase your Life Points by the ATK of the attacking monster." Also please use correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightning Bagon Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 @ KariJust PM me the effect so I can fix the errors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua Girl Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Ah thats Great well I guess I got to try later. Thanks for the Fix boss.Well heres my normal member card...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Well in advance since I'll be to busy partying HAPPY NEW YEAR! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 When this card is attacked by a monster with lower ATK than this card's DEF, increase your Life Points by the ATK of the attacking monster. lower, not fewer creator... you can;'t have fewer ATK, it;s just plain grammatically wrong... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 fewer, lower means the same thing.I was typing quickly, trying to get ready for a party so don't bug me right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 ... lower is gramatically correct in that situattion, just don't want a new card maker getting misguided. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enma Kozato Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 well hello link. anyways we know that the only problemwith he card is if you can cmprehend the effect so either stating it out more clearly or changing the forma of the effect would suffice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Yeah, it's an interesting card, but still rough around the edges. Also, creator gave me the idea for a new years special for the fanfic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 I warneed him against it.But then it turned out he hadn't thought of it yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enma Kozato Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 ...partyy? you should post it at midnight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua Girl Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Eh I cant stay up that late maby but I doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enma Kozato Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Aqua have you seen/joined ur site yet the link is at the top of the first post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua Girl Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Meh..... I dont think I want to Juggle two sites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 You don't have to juggle, its really more of a way to keep track of active members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua Girl Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 I dont realy want to. sorry It just dosent apeal to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 the only reason they say musician = spellcaster is because of musician king. No, no, noo! Even Konami doesn't make sense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 @Aquaalright thats your choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.