SushiTheLegend Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Idea is nice, did you post one of these "Tuning Spells"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted November 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Idea is nice' date=' did you post one of these "Tuning Spells"?[/quote'] Actually, yes I did, but I've been to lazy to actually fix the problem. I forgot to change the Spell status of Foreseeing Wish to Tuning Spell, so, yeah. EDIT: There, fixed the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Ragnarok' date=' you probably meant that it needs a drawback because it gets its returning effect when used for the summoning of a Spell Synchro monster? If so, how does that even need a drawback? As for your new card, why 2100? Why not an even 2000 for it? What's so wrong with 2100? Not even enough for you? You aren't going to bother with my answer' date=' you're just going to say both to answer it for me. After all, you've LONG since convinced yourself nothing I post is logical, so why should this one be any different?[/quote'] Why is it that you are always making it like all people are being oh-so-bad at you? Seriously. And yes, all the post you make are illogical, and horrible. Let me tell you something, when you've heard it for WAY too long, you start to believe differently towards others. And believe me, NO ONE is immune to that You can convince yourself all you want that can't happen to you, but it will once given the opportunity. After all, it's not like you've said anything BUT everything I post is utter crap anyway, so don't bother trying to convince yourself otherwise Now, as for why I felt you use 2000 instead of the 2100, you know what I mean by even. Usually you just don't see cards with 2100 in the effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfbat Master Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 - Any Corrections need making? None- What you like about the card(s). The originality- What you dislike about it (if anything). none- What rating you would give it. 9.5/10- Additional comments. really good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted November 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 Bump, updated with a new card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Läufer Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 OMG me likey.Holos are rawsomz, as well as pics and Spell Synchro card effects. 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shalltear Bloodfallen Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 Nice idea.Some of the pics could be better allthough. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 don't see why you'd want to make it twice per turn other than that the rest of the effects and OCG look just fine the way they are, so I'll give it 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.