legacy117 Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 [align=left]A new Card Type I created: Breaker. These card have a specific summoning order just like other cards. You need to sacrifice at least one "Pristine" monster in your Graveyard and one monster on the field whose total level equal the level of the Breaker monster you wish to summon. The card frame would be RED if I had the color. They also can "break" through your opponent's defenses or offenses and attack them directly, but if that effect is done so, they are destroyed during the End Phase of the turn they were summoned and you lose Life Points equal to half of the Breaker monster's DEF if that happens; giving them the name "Breaker". An example: I know I have to edit it to explain its summoning order. So, enjoy the unedited example for now! Rate ??/10[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kalinkesler Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 wow nice 10/10 :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 remove Breaker, it's not a real type first 2 sentences should be something like This card can attack your opponent directly. If you use this effect, it is destroying during your End Phase it's a reasonable effect, I'll give it 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmc1234 Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 So breaker cards are just like Synchro's The ocg is alright but this is op'd 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DroutTrigger Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 You should call the card series the Breaker Series. plus if this card needs 1 monster from the field and one from the Graveyard, shouldn't you put "This monster cannot be Normal Summon except by tributing 1 monster from the field and 1 monster from the Graveyard and remove them" on the Card Text? I mean at least the person needs to know how to summon it plus you need o remove the word breaker since its not a type. other than that, i think is an ok card 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 remove Breaker' date=' it's not a real type[/quote'] You're right, it's a subtype. At least it appears to be, by the way he typed it. But if it were a subtype, it would replace the "Effect" part of the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leturn Master Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 if you're planning on making monsters of this, caliber, then I see MAJOR OTKs coming. Imagine tributing for a 6-star Breaker, then killing him and rfp-ing a 1-star in the grave for a 7-star, then maybe doing that with an 8-star... it sounds like REALLY easy Synchro summoning... you need a better mechanic. Regardless, I fixed up the card for ya. Didn't have the time or patience to get a picture, so here it is without one: Enjoy yourselves! And make this balanced! Warm Regards.:mrgreen: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 So wait... You -2 yourself for a monster that is destroyed at the end phase. And atk is so minimal it's only good in some obscure Magical Merchant deck? Yeah... Good concept. Bad presentation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 Sow, it's ATK can reach up to ova 4000? Tad oped.9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightmare drake Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 good card8.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodafancyo Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 My cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 My cards No, his cards. His. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 Sow' date=' it's ATK can reach up to ova 4000? Tad oped.[/quote'] You're an idiot. Meh, seems like an interesting way to Summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwilightSoul Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 I like it i think it's something that could catch on oh btw i rate out of 5's now spread the word5/5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted December 1, 2009 Report Share Posted December 1, 2009 Sow' date=' it's ATK can reach up to ova 4000? Tad oped.[/quote'] You're an idiot. Meh, seems like an interesting way to Summon. You'll never know if you have a deck full of Traps. I would make a Deck full of Traps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted December 1, 2009 Report Share Posted December 1, 2009 You need to sacrifice at least one monster on the field and one monster in your Graveyard Explain how this works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted December 1, 2009 Report Share Posted December 1, 2009 You need to sacrifice at least one monster on the field and one monster in your Graveyard Explain how this works.It doesn't. Special Summon via tributing a monster and removing a dead monster does, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted December 1, 2009 Report Share Posted December 1, 2009 Removing from play works, killing something that died doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leturn Master Posted December 5, 2009 Report Share Posted December 5, 2009 I can see someone just stabbing the dead corpse of a monster... it make sense. I think they both get RFP-ed... Anyone else wanna continue this idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorrow. Posted December 5, 2009 Report Share Posted December 5, 2009 Uhh no... Vanila Types are no good. Breaker is really unorignal how about putting Breaker in there name. OP'ed, Atroucius Pic.3/10Sorry.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leturn Master Posted December 5, 2009 Report Share Posted December 5, 2009 Uhh no... Vanila Types are no good. Breaker is really unorignal how about putting Breaker in there name. OP'ed' date=' Atroucius Pic.3/10Sorry..[/quote'] Let me comment: 'Vanila Types' -- Spelling? Plus, this isn't really 'vanilla'... it's a decent idea. 'unorignal' -- Spelling again? Add that to the fact that no one has come up with it before... Like Synchros, but you don't choose when you can get them (since they go in your Deck). 'putting Breaker in there name' -- Grammar? And they're not an archtype. 'OP'ed' -- tell me why this card is overpowered. You -1 yourself for about 2600 LP damage to your opponent... that's just strong. I can see the card being taken down to limited status. 'Atroucius Pic' -- Spelling again.... it's 'atrocious'.... and the pic is actually quite awesome. I find your review utterly and completely unhelpful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSJGoten Posted December 5, 2009 Report Share Posted December 5, 2009 Um the effect needs to change a bit and breaker needs to be change 8.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorrow. Posted December 5, 2009 Report Share Posted December 5, 2009 Uhh no... Vanila Types are no good. Breaker is really unorignal how about putting Breaker in there name. OP'ed' date=' Atroucius Pic.3/10Sorry..[/quote'] Let me comment: 'Vanila Types' -- Spelling? Plus, this isn't really 'vanilla'... it's a decent idea. 'unorignal' -- Spelling again? Add that to the fact that no one has come up with it before... Like Synchros, but you don't choose when you can get them (since they go in your Deck). 'putting Breaker in there name' -- Grammar? And they're not an archtype. 'OP'ed' -- tell me why this card is overpowered. You -1 yourself for about 2600 LP damage to your opponent... that's just strong. I can see the card being taken down to limited status. 'Atroucius Pic' -- Spelling again.... it's 'atrocious'.... and the pic is actually quite awesome. I find your review utterly and completely unhelpful. -.- more of thoose I'm bored Ill correct you! Thanks for the atrocious correcting. Let me... be me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leturn Master Posted December 5, 2009 Report Share Posted December 5, 2009 Uhh no... Vanila Types are no good. Breaker is really unorignal how about putting Breaker in there name. OP'ed' date=' Atroucius Pic.3/10Sorry..[/quote'] Let me comment: 'Vanila Types' -- Spelling? Plus, this isn't really 'vanilla'... it's a decent idea. 'unorignal' -- Spelling again? Add that to the fact that no one has come up with it before... Like Synchros, but you don't choose when you can get them (since they go in your Deck). 'putting Breaker in there name' -- Grammar? And they're not an archtype. 'OP'ed' -- tell me why this card is overpowered. You -1 yourself for about 2600 LP damage to your opponent... that's just strong. I can see the card being taken down to limited status. 'Atroucius Pic' -- Spelling again.... it's 'atrocious'.... and the pic is actually quite awesome. I find your review utterly and completely unhelpful. -.- more of thoose I'm bored Ill correct you! Thanks for the atrocious correcting. Let me... be me... I just find your flaming irritating. I mean... it's... flaming... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorrow. Posted December 5, 2009 Report Share Posted December 5, 2009 Ughh I'm doing it again... I thought I threw this hate down the drain.Leturn Master I apologize for flaming, but please I really hate it when people correct me for bordem...Yeah you won I am kissing up to you.. -.- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.