fenrir Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Counter Sortofcounterthat'stoolazytobeacounter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Meh, I don't mind them at all. Heck, I made 3 custom types of my own: Shinigami (Basically a diety of death - and it has been floating around long enough)Immortal (this was actually a type in Yu-Gi-Oh; Duelists of the Roses)Elemental (used in Magic The Gathering - since some monsters don't fit a single type) I don't mark down for a unrealistic type or subtype. The people are being creative, so I won't bust them for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenrir Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Shinigami (Basically a diety of death - and it has been floating around long enough) Fiend.Immortal (this was actually a type in Yu-Gi-Oh; Duelists of the Roses) Divine-Beast or AngelElemental (used in Magic The Gathering - since some monsters don't fit a single type) Aqua' date=' Pyro, Rock, Thunder[/b'] Not so original. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Shinigami (Basically a diety of death - and it has been floating around long enough) Fiend.Immortal (this was actually a type in Yu-Gi-Oh; Duelists of the Roses) Divine-Beast or AngelElemental (used in Magic The Gathering - since some monsters don't fit a single type) Aqua' date=' Pyro, Rock, Thunder[/b'] Not so original. Didn't say they were original. They work, though. (That and I needed more types for a special project - and these worked just fine. ANd just for fun... Shinigami - The captains of the Gotei 13 aren't FiendsImmortal - This was a type in a video game. Just curious, but did you play Duelists of the Roses?Elemental - Meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dweller of Parables Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Shinigami (Basically a diety of death - and it has been floating around long enough) Fiend.Immortal (this was actually a type in Yu-Gi-Oh; Duelists of the Roses) Divine-Beast or AngelElemental (used in Magic The Gathering - since some monsters don't fit a single type) Aqua' date=' Pyro, Rock, Thunder[/b'] Not so original.In MTG, it sounds okay.In YGO, it sounds 6@Y. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenrir Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Shinigami (Basically a diety of death - and it has been floating around long enough) Fiend.Immortal (this was actually a type in Yu-Gi-Oh; Duelists of the Roses) Divine-Beast or AngelElemental (used in Magic The Gathering - since some monsters don't fit a single type) Aqua' date=' Pyro, Rock, Thunder[/b'] Not so original. Didn't say they were original. They work, though. (That and I needed more types for a special project - and these worked just fine. ANd just for fun... Shinigami - The captains of the Gotei 13 aren't FiendsImmortal - This was a type in a video game. Just curious, but did you play Duelists of the Roses?Elemental - Meh. Bleach is a horrible example of Shinigami.Yes I have, actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Shinigami (Basically a diety of death - and it has been floating around long enough) Fiend.Immortal (this was actually a type in Yu-Gi-Oh; Duelists of the Roses) Divine-Beast or AngelElemental (used in Magic The Gathering - since some monsters don't fit a single type) Aqua' date=' Pyro, Rock, Thunder[/b'] Not so original. Didn't say they were original. They work, though. (That and I needed more types for a special project - and these worked just fine. ANd just for fun... Shinigami - The captains of the Gotei 13 aren't FiendsImmortal - This was a type in a video game. Just curious, but did you play Duelists of the Roses?Elemental - Meh. Bleach is a horrible example of Shinigami.Yes I have, actually. Bleach was just an example of diversity. No harm intended. I actually haven't made any cards on YCM with the Shinigami type. (It's only on the special project) Remember when Slate Warrior was classified as an Immortal type? Didn't you love ticking people off with the fact that it could walk on Crush terrain and make it when it died? (Too bad there weren't that many Immortal-Type monsters in the game, though) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Chrono Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Shinigami (Fiend. No need for a fake type)Immortal (I don't know, depends on the card)Elemental (Fairy or Spellcaster) There are plenty of types out there, Fake Types are stupid. There is some creativity going for 2% of them, but to my knowledge if you want to be "Creative" make an Archetype. it's much more accepted in Realistic. If a card has a Fake Type then it is in no way realistic, so why would it go in Realistic Cards. Open your eyes people. Fake-Types are not realistic, and that is the end of the matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megami Seika Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 I guess Evry one Is too outa whack to make a careful coment. Listen most of the arguhments Comeing from you guys is that Fake types suck becaous Idiots put ninja or other crap in thier Types, This is understandable but when we goahead and try and talk about our club people dont care becaous you say it was a spam whole, witch it was spammy but not as bad as most people say. Another thing Alfred Has no validity to any thing he says he only said sheet becaous Chase(A.K.A Zero) Called him on spam and he wanted revenge by calling Flame and arughing we were a spam whole when we were recently attacked by a (Second accounter) guy that after we alowed him to join spammed like crazy. What most people dont understand about our club is that were not only after respect for fake types, We are also dedicated to Eradicateing The noobs that use Fake types lightly and do crap like put Ninja as the Title. OoC: Wow Icy never seen you get on this subject before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Again Everyone agrees that Fake Types don't belong in Realistic. But there are other sections besides Realistic. In AoC Fake Types are treated horribly because people are to set in their ways. If people would rate based on the quality of the card and not Type, then this entire fourm would be better. Or at least freindlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenrir Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Shinigami (Basically a diety of death - and it has been floating around long enough) Fiend.Immortal (this was actually a type in Yu-Gi-Oh; Duelists of the Roses) Divine-Beast or AngelElemental (used in Magic The Gathering - since some monsters don't fit a single type) Aqua' date=' Pyro, Rock, Thunder[/b'] Not so original. Didn't say they were original. They work, though. (That and I needed more types for a special project - and these worked just fine. ANd just for fun... Shinigami - The captains of the Gotei 13 aren't FiendsImmortal - This was a type in a video game. Just curious, but did you play Duelists of the Roses?Elemental - Meh. Bleach is a horrible example of Shinigami.Yes I have, actually. Bleach was just an example of diversity. No harm intended. I actually haven't made any cards on YCM with the Shinigami type. (It's only on the special project) Remember when Slate Warrior was classified as an Immortal type? Didn't you love ticking people off with the fact that it could walk on Crush terrain and make it when it died? (Too bad there weren't that many Immortal-Type monsters in the game, though) I didn't use Slate Warrior in particular. (I was a big Barrel Dragon fan back then.) Though, back on topic. Fake Types aren't creative unless they cover a type not covered by other cards, i.e. Inventor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Shinigami (Basically a diety of death - and it has been floating around long enough) Fiend.Immortal (this was actually a type in Yu-Gi-Oh; Duelists of the Roses) Divine-Beast or AngelElemental (used in Magic The Gathering - since some monsters don't fit a single type) Aqua' date=' Pyro, Rock, Thunder[/b'] Not so original. Didn't say they were original. They work, though. (That and I needed more types for a special project - and these worked just fine. ANd just for fun... Shinigami - The captains of the Gotei 13 aren't FiendsImmortal - This was a type in a video game. Just curious, but did you play Duelists of the Roses?Elemental - Meh. Bleach is a horrible example of Shinigami.Yes I have, actually. Bleach was just an example of diversity. No harm intended. I actually haven't made any cards on YCM with the Shinigami type. (It's only on the special project) Remember when Slate Warrior was classified as an Immortal type? Didn't you love ticking people off with the fact that it could walk on Crush terrain and make it when it died? (Too bad there weren't that many Immortal-Type monsters in the game, though) I didn't use Slate Warrior in particular. (I was a big Barrel Dragon fan back then.) Though, back on topic. Fake Types aren't creative unless they cover a type not covered by other cards, i.e. Inventor. Warrior, Spellcaster or Psychic might be able to cover that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Great now My Inventors are going to be used in every arguement of this type now. I guess thats my contribution to the Fourm. @SaturnPaladinInventors use Science not Spellcasters. They don't fight, they build Machines to do that for them. Again how is an Inventor a Psychic? No ESP what so ever, its all skill with tools. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Chrono Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Great now My Inventors are going to be used in every arguement of this type now. I guess thats my contribution to the Fourm. @SaturnPaladinInventors use Science not Spellcasters. They don't fight' date=' they build [b']Machines[/b] to do that for them. Again how is an Inventor a Psychic? No ESP what so ever, its all skill with tools.Answer... OR this covers your Inventor category I guess... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Spellcaster = Spellcasters read books and tomes. Usually, we had to put Scholars under this class. Also, not all the Gravekeepers look like Spellcasters to me. (Spear Soldier and such)Warrior = Inventors can ALSO buld cybernetic enhancements and do the fighting themselves. (Look at Iron Man)Psychic = Meh, you got me there. (Not actively trying to diss the Inventor-Type. It's actually sounds quite interesting. Don't get me wrong) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Inventors are the ones who are handy and skilled with tools. Yes they can build Cybernetic enhancements, but wouldn't that be an Equip Spell? Also if they did do that then yes I would reclassify them as either Warrior or Machine. These are your basic, build it, fix it, Inventors.@NarasaKey word there is "Magical", Inventors don't use Magic. Its all Science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megami Seika Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Wow People just need to read the other coments befor saying suff they dont know. >. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 I'm just going to link ths post to my Inventor thread. That should be enough of a defense for the Inventors.http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-168311.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Inventors are the ones who are handy and skilled with tools. Yes they can build Cybernetic enhancements' date=' but wouldn't that be an Equip Spell? Also if they did do that then yes I would reclassify them as either Warrior or Machine. These are your basic, build it, fix it, Inventors.@NarasaKey word there is "Magical", Inventors don't use Magic. Its all Science.[/quote'] One can always use tools to fight in a pinch. Heck, that's what farmers did back in the ancient days. (Sais were actually used to poke holes in the ground for seeds - now they're weapons). I won't drag this on any longer. Your type seems pretty well thought out - and I can respect that. I'd do it differently, but that's just me. Keep up the good work, dude. (Watch - Konami scopes out the site, sees your new type, and uses it) 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 If so, this would result1. OMFG, Konami is using my Type!2. Wait.... shouldn't I get credit for it?3. *calls Konami*(this is where it branches)4a. Awesome, Konami is going to pay for helping them come up with a new type.4b. *sues Konami for rights to Inventor-Type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megami Seika Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 They already did A guy about a year ago made Ice Berrior monsters and now look. XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesirson Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 I do dislike Fake types, but Fake Subtypes I'm okay with. And concerning double types, things like Dragon-Warrior and stuff looks retarded, instead put Dragon / Warrior, or say in the effect that the card is both Dragon and Warrior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 What is it about Fake Types that you dislike? Aside from the noobish ones like 'Ninja" or "Samurai" or "Necromancer". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megami Seika Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 I do dislike Fake types' date=' but Fake Subtypes I'm okay with. And concerning double types, things like Dragon-Warrior and stuff looks retarded, instead put Dragon / Warrior, or say in the effect that the card is both Dragon and Warrior.[/quote'] See this is the type of comet people should post.Hes expressing his opinion but not going nuts over it! Freaking Beautiful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted December 6, 2009 Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Fake types and attributes suck. Fake subtypes are awesome when they're pulled off properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.