Loanshark [New Single] !!!

[kliffi]

Heyas! I got a new, unique-er (:D) single for you guys... Hope you enjoy.

 

 

[align=center][spoiler=Lore]

This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set if there are any LIGHT monsters face-up on the field. When this card is Normal Summoned or flipped face-up, both players gain 3000 Life Points. When either player destroys Monster, Spell, or Trap card on their opponent's side of the field, increase that player's Life Points by 500. When this card is sent from the field to the Graveyard, both players pay 6000 Life Points. If a player can't pay, destroy all cards on that player's side of the field.

 

 

[/align]

 

- - -

 

This card is more for late-game in case you hadn't noticed. :)

 

Oh! And for all you uneducated types:

 

[spoiler=Loanshark Definition]

A loan shark is a person or body that offers unsecured loans at high interest rates to individuals, often backed by blackmail or threats of violence.

 

 

[Mr. Hyde]

Amazing card.

I love the picture and the Effect matches the name perfectly.

10/10

[Metal Skull]

Why am i loving this pic???

 

Mind sending it to me???

 

Anyway amazing pics 3)

 

I found 1 OCG error:

cannot do this - can't pay

 

The effect is balanced, but you should change something...

 

I like the effect and it's usefull

 

9/10

 

I suggest you to change the cost to like 6000 LP (last effect) and instead each time a card is sent, put each time a card is destroyed (those are different )

 

That's all ;)

[kliffi]

Mind sending it to me???

 

Sure thing! It is small, but that's how I got it. :)

 

Thanks for the comments, guys. I was originally trying to make some sort of "shark" card, and this is what I conjured up. Glad you like it.

[Metal Skull]

Could ya send me the full size pic???

I can't just take it from the card...it will stay a bit blurry :(

Send me by PM if you have it

---

Sorry receive it now!!!

THX :D

[Lord Smeagle]

Effect is very good.

 

But given the pic, shouldn't he be a pool shark?

 

Ah well, 10/10 for lulzy effect and great pic anyway.

[kliffi]

 

But given the pic' date=' shouldn't he be a pool shark?

 

[/quote']

 

lol that's what I was thinking when I saw this, in fact, the name of the pic (from Deviantart) is Pool Shark. I just didn't know what to do with that name so I brewed up my Loanshark, and this pic fit the best. And besides, are loan sharks not allowed to play pool nowadays? :(

 

lol thanks for the comment. :P

[~Wright~]

This card is awesome! 10/10

Seems pretty balanced to me, since it applies to you to. However, it doesn't seem very playable. What sort of deck would this be run in?

[ragnarok1945]

I'm surprised you didn't say it's a Pool Shark

 

anyways onto the effect, the 6000 LP effect at the end is just fine for it. I'd have said if EITHER player cannot pay, destroy all cards on the field (that way you won't have low LP while all your opponent lost is his field)

 

9.5/10

[ragnarok1945]

I'm surprised you didn't say it's a Pool Shark

 

anyways onto the effect, the 6000 LP effect at the end is just fine for it. I'd have said if EITHER player cannot pay, destroy all cards on the field (that way you won't have low LP while all your opponent lost is his field)

 

9.5/10

[Jolta]

Fish Type suits it better.

 

The effect is like gambling. 10/10 But just change the type.

[kliffi]

I'm surprised you didn't say it's a Pool Shark

 

anyways onto the effect' date=' the 6000 LP effect at the end is just fine for it. I'd have said if EITHER player cannot pay, destroy all cards on the field (that way you won't have low LP while all your opponent lost is his field)

 

[/quote']

 

I would've called it a Pool Shark if there were any effects that could ever possibly apply to the name :-/

 

I would do EITHER player's, but then if 1 player couldn't pay, and 1 could, then there would be no setback, so 1 player would still have the LP they gained, and 1 would have lost there's (ex. Player 1 had 5900 LP, the other had 4800, one would end up with 900 LP, the other with 4800 lol) Also, if 1 could pay and the other couldn't, it would balance out because 1 of them might have lower LP (if they played well) and the other would have an empty field. Thanks for critique. :)

 

This card is awesome! 10/10

Seems pretty balanced to me' date=' since it applies to you to. However, it doesn't seem very playable. What sort of deck would this be run in?

[/quote']

 

This deck would play in a field destruction deck VERY well. you'd gain tons of LP because you are great at burning your opponent's field, and if your opponent fails at destroying back, thats another whole field gone :)

 

Thanks for comments/rates... glad to see others like my newest idea :D

[-DOOM]

LOl great card!! i love the effect^^

but 6000 Life Points are too much in my opinion.

i've seen no OCG errors and the pic is awesome, so 9,5/10

[kliffi]

The 6000 price is necessary because otherwise, this card would simply feed people Life Points. It probably won't hurt you too bad if you know how to light up a field even a little. you defiitely wont sit there if this card is on the field, just like how someone wouldnt sit there if a loanshark was on their case rofl... thanks for comment.