Tronta Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 1 mojo1 night assailant1 sangan2 needle worm2 giant rat3 shell3 thunder13 3 shallow grave3 eclipse3 moon3 taiyou3 upstart2 hand dest1 card dest1 foolish1 trunade1 poa2 mse23 2 sunlight1 acid traphole2 waboku5 deck 41 extra deck:1 dd burials1 heavy1 mst2 trap eater1 gorz1 traggo2 ryko2 penguin soldier2 light imprisoning mirror2 spear cretin updated for march 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 If you're running 42, you might as well just cut two upstart goblins out... it comes out to exactly the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 3 Upstarts 42 cards 42-3 = 39 39=/=37 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted December 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2009 err, that was old math from when i ran 40 even.now let me rethink it. 42 cards. 3 of them are upstarts, so they dont exist.so 39 cards.then... 3 of those can be composed into one card, (thunder dragons)so down to 38. so if you read what i said carefully, upstart makes it 37, 3 thunder dragons equates to one more card in the deck. 37 + 1 = 38. i wasnt wrong, i just said it ambiguously. and now that i think about it, yea, i guess i could just not run the other upstarts and it would be the same.but i want to. anyone suggest 2 other cards i can cut out to make this break even? i'm not really feeling the love from coth...and maybe i could cut a hand dest...? any thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted December 23, 2009 Report Share Posted December 23, 2009 -Book of Moon-Call I've never seen the need for so many 'flip-down' Spells. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted December 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2009 well book of moon can also be used defensively. but i usually run through most or every moon.for the defensive dual-purpose of them, i think i need it at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted December 23, 2009 Report Share Posted December 23, 2009 I've never needed it that much tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydra of Ages Posted December 23, 2009 Report Share Posted December 23, 2009 Hmm...How are the Cups of Ace working for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted December 23, 2009 Report Share Posted December 23, 2009 Playing around with flip troll 6, I always found the cup of aces kind of lame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted December 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2009 the cup of aces dont troll me too hard, but they do make a card destruction become simply delicious. i could see my way to knocking just those.. but coth is really feeling meek to me.sideable maybe? no.. i like the 4th revival card. i dunno, i need to playtest more with said variations. actually, funny story, i just lost to a yugi deck with this.had 50 god damned cards, exodia, blue eyes, dark magician, and your mother in it.i really only lost because of the 50 cards though. and i let him get away with mst'ing the dwd i was playing. i felt it easier to let him have it then to sit down and explain to him everything that was wrong with that.god damned billy decks. funking 50 cards. i got him down to the last god damned card in the deck after pulling 20 off with two funking sts, but he swung with all his giant sheet, which was admittedly my fault (shallows, ya know).i lost a second round because i misplayed a book of eclipse, but i would have won 6 of my cards earlier if he hadnt had that god damned 50 card stack. actually, i suspect it was closer to 60, it looked like a big funking deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted December 23, 2009 Report Share Posted December 23, 2009 That almost happened to me with flip 6. I was playing this noob with a 60 card deck based on Lycanthrope (lol), I didn't lose but it took forever to make him deck out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted December 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2009 well i unfortunately gave him so much field presence that i couldnt really stop him. to be honest, i kind of played worse because he was a terrible guy. like i said, mst meets a dwd.stupid.oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted December 23, 2009 Report Share Posted December 23, 2009 Hows it been testing buddy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted December 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 not enough decks to playtest against, havent been out jugimansing in a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 123 thunder dragon3 giant rat1 sangan1 needle worm1 morphing jar3 volcanic shell 283 upstart goblin3 dark world dealings3 hand destruction2 magical mallet1 card destruction1 pot of avarice2 magical stone excavation2 foolish burial2 book of moon3 book of eclipse3 book of taiyou3 shallow grave side 152 needle worm3 prohibition2 gold sarcophagus1 heavy storm1 giant trunade3 waboku3 threatening roar This is what I run and it's doing very well vs everything. I want to fit a giant trunade in the main deck but I don't know what to cut for. I might just add it and run 41. Giant Rat is insane it's like extra copies of morphing jar, with it you can win in your MP2. I don't like desert sunlight since it's like a book of taiyou but slower. MSE is faster and the cost isn't a problem with jar. I like the idea of CotH but like the shallow grave it's dead if you don't have foolish burial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted December 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 i never liked running rats, i always found it too slow.>.< but i could try it moreful. and sunlight was to throw out those last cards in a big sweep on their turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 If you wanna playtest over msn once, just pm me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zenharu Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Is this the deck you played against me the other day? Cuz That Fat Guy was saying that this deck is retarded and wins by turn 1 80% of the time, all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted December 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 ~<3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 "Do you want to go first, or not at all?" I need to fit that in the trailer somewhere... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 This is something you can playtest alone. Fist time I playtested it vs a friend, I opened Morphing Jar, Book of Taiyou and milled him on my first turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted December 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 that /is/ my new tagline.isnt it beautiful that this deck has a two-card otk? and a three-card otk with foolish-shallow-taiyouand so many more sweeps. love it~ and fatty, i'm still waiting on that trailer :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 that /is/ my new tagline.isnt it beautiful that this deck has a two-card otk? and a three-card otk with foolish-shallow-taiyouand so many more sweeps. love it~ and fatty' date=' i'm still waiting on that trailer :P[/quote'] I once lost with foolish+shallow+taiyou because my opponent had d.d. crow in his main deck. It isn't common but let's say I wasn't expecting this game to end so quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted December 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 funking dd crow is my only headache. actually oppression is bad too. thats why you have to side ddburials, and st destruction. and aspirin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 I didnt play MGS4 or Dragon Age: Origins because this deck got me addicted to playing it.Just sayin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.