burnpsy Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Infernity (40) Monsters (16) 1x Dark Armed Dragon1x Evil Hero Infernal Gainer3x Infernity Archfiend3x Infernity Beetle2x Infernity Guardian2x Infernity Mirage3x Infernity Necromancer1x Infernity Revenger Spells (12) 2x Allure of Darkness2x Foolish Burial1x Heavy Storm3x Infernity Gun1x Lightning Vortex1x Offerings to the Doomed2x ZERO - MAX Traps (12) 1x Call of the Haunted1x Full Salvo2x Handless Fake2x Infernity Break3x Infernity Reflector1x Mirror Force1x Solemn Judgment1x Torrential Tribute Extra Deck (15) 1x Ally of Justice Catastor1x Archfiend Chaos King1x Armory Arm3x Brionac, Dragon of the Ice Barrier3x Infernity Doom Dragon3x One-Hundred Eye Dragon3x Stardust Dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 You are running too many monsters. You'll have a hard time reaching 0 cards in hand if you don't draw infernity reflector even with infernity gun. I'd cut the infernity destroyer and 1 mirage to add foolish burials since they work so well with all your graveyard recursion. -2 destroyer-1 mirage +2 foolish burial+1 call of the haunted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted December 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 You are running too many monsters. You'll have a hard time reaching 0 cards in hand if you don't draw infernity reflector even with infernity gun. I'd cut the infernity destroyer and 1 mirage to add foolish burials since they work so well with all your graveyard recursion. -2 destroyer-1 mirage +2 foolish burial+1 call of the haunted You have a point, I just don't like removing destroyer. D: Aww, whatevs, I'll just change it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted December 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 have you tried handless fake yet? I think the opition to remove your hand until your next standby phase would be useful to the deck, plus, the return is part of the original effect, so it can't be negated by killing handless fake after you remove your hand. I mean, keeping your hand and activating your inferinty monsters? why shouldn't you run it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted December 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 have you tried handless fake yet? I think the opition to remove your hand until your next standby phase would be useful to the deck' date=' plus, the return is part of the original effect, so it can't be negated by killing handless fake after you remove your hand. I mean, keeping your hand and activating your inferinty monsters? why shouldn't you run it?[/quote'] I didn't know that. Do you have an idea on what to toss for it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Reckless greed?Really? Run 2 HF over it, and. a lightning vortex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted December 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Reckless greed?Really? Run 2 HF over it' date=' and. a lightning vortex.[/quote'] You can't argue that decks don't need draw engines. Even if this weren't infernities, the lack of draw aside from the 2x Allure is still bad. I'll try the 2x Handless Fake, but won't LV be a bit inconsistent in here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 One-Hundred Eye Dragon is un-needed here, as it doesnt have the anime effect. So why run it? For the sake of it bieng Kiryu-esque? O,o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Reckless greed?Really? Run 2 HF over it' date=' and. a lightning vortex.[/quote'] You can't argue that decks don't need draw engines. Even if this weren't infernities, the lack of draw aside from the 2x Allure is still bad. I'll try the 2x Handless Fake, but won't LV be a bit inconsistent in here? No, it discards and destroys. Infernities like both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted December 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 One-Hundred Eye Dragon is un-needed here' date=' as it doesnt have the anime effect. So why run it? For the sake of it bieng Kiryu-esque? O,o[/quote'] On top of the fact that it can copy any and every Infernity in the deck, yeah. :P It made more sense when Destroyer was in here. Reckless greed?Really? Run 2 HF over it' date=' and. a lightning vortex.[/quote'] You can't argue that decks don't need draw engines. Even if this weren't infernities, the lack of draw aside from the 2x Allure is still bad. I'll try the 2x Handless Fake, but won't LV be a bit inconsistent in here? No, it discards and destroys. Infernities like both. With Reflector keeping my hand empty... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted December 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Dood, as a self proclaimed expert at Infernities I suggest you tech 1 Full Salvo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted December 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Dood' date=' as a self proclaimed expert at Infernities I suggest you tech 1 Full Salvo.[/quote'] You mean for an unexpected hand clear? If so, Reflector would like a word... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Full Salvo is far less situational. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted December 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Full Salvo is far less situational. Destruction negation is situational now? >____> Anyways, what should I toss for it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 I never said it was situational I said full salvo was less situational. Neg and offerings for one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted December 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Done xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.