Mindscatter Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Discuss it's position on the banlist. Also, discuss it's position on the banlist if this would be it's effect: Each time a card(s) is sent from your Deck to the Graveyard, place 1 Shine Counter on this card for every card sent. All "Lightsworn" monsters and "Judgement Dragon" gain 100 ATK for each Shine Counter. If this card or a "Lightsworn" monster would be destroyed by a card effect removed from the field, remove 2 Shine Counters instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Assuming we have a 3 or 0 list. Now: 3 Your effect: 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Knowing the fact that a 3 or 0 list is stupidity at it's highest. Now: 3Your Effect: 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 It counts "times" not "cards". IE: Mill 3 once, you get one shine counter, not three. As is, I don't find it all that bannable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 It counts "times" not "cards". IE: Mill 3 once' date=' you get one shine counter, not three. As is, I don't find it all that bannable[/quote'] Exactly, but he re-wrote it so that it gains a counter for each card sent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Assuming we have a 3 or 0 list. Now: 3 Your effect: 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 No good. Although when l was new to LS I ran it like a pro. Not a bad card persé, just too slow and requires setup and time that LS don't have. lf it was for every card sent, pro's would have a field day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 My reaction when someone said he found it playable: Your last change would OP it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 This whole thread is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XP_Lulz Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 This whole thread is bad. also Assuming we have a 3 or 0 list. Now: 3 Your effect: 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Now - 3New - -9001 No, srsly, it would be ridiculously OP'ed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 It would not be that bad. It could be destroyed upon activation. The, everything would become unkillable... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Current - 3 Your effect - MEGA BANNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Banned even in Traditional) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 (Banned even in Traditional) Stop failing pl0x. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 The answer here's unanimous. Basically, this topic's stupid. Knowing the fact that a 3 or 0 list is stupidity at it's highest. You used "it's" as a possessive, your argument is invalid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.