Lord Smeagle Posted January 19, 2010 Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 Since most of the cards I reviewed in separate threads already' date=' there's little need for me to look at them again but still, for giving such great DIVINE support, I'll rate the set 10/10[/quote'] Tis what happens when great YCM Card Makers put their minds together. We mix like nitro and glycerin. In a good way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted January 19, 2010 Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 Since most of the cards I reviewed in separate threads already' date=' there's little need for me to look at them again but still, for giving such great DIVINE support, I'll rate the set 10/10[/quote'] Tis what happens when great YCM Card Makers put their minds together. We mix like nitro and glycerin. In a good way. Fire and Water in a good wa- owait, wrong analogy.Um, Dark and Light. One cannot exist without the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 19, 2010 Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 Since most of the cards I reviewed in separate threads already' date=' there's little need for me to look at them again but still, for giving such great DIVINE support, I'll rate the set 10/10[/quote'] Good damn. 10/10? Oh guys, we did real good. ;D I jizzed when I saw Xander's card. IT IS THAT AWESOME. I tip my hat off to you' date=' good sir.[/quote'] Inorite? Also, thanks to Smeagle and BlackWind, we have a Spell Section. Ironicly, I think the new Field Spell is encouraging OTKs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted January 19, 2010 Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 Since most of the cards I reviewed in separate threads already' date=' there's little need for me to look at them again but still, for giving such great DIVINE support, I'll rate the set 10/10[/quote'] Good damn. 10/10? Oh guys, we did real good. ;D I jizzed when I saw Xander's card. IT IS THAT AWESOME. I tip my hat off to you' date=' good sir.[/quote'] Inorite? Also, thanks to Smeagle and BlackWind, we have a Spell Section. Ironicly, I think the new Field Spell is encouraging OTKs. Ironic? They're God cards. Each of the original 3 had OTK capability built right in, what with Ra's LP to ATK conversion, Obelisk's infinite ATK combo, and Slifer's fun-with-Infinite-Cards shtick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackWindDragon Posted January 19, 2010 Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 im thanking about doing some other spell card, or even a trap card for this set. i think that if we get enough done, we could do a complete DIVINE deck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Lightning Posted January 19, 2010 Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 Nice Set; Don't usually see good Divine monsters, but these are some of the few :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Seperated Synchros and Tuners. I plan to do the same if we get a Fusion or two. Anyway, a Synchro added by BlackWind and a Tuner added by Xander. A trap added from both of them too. Also:Divine Visionary + Asension Of The Divine Ones = TWIN SURPRISE BUTTSECKS GOD SUMMONINGS. I lol'd.Nice job guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackWindDragon Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 we do try, we do try Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 I don't however =oBut we still do make the set shine.I do at least. And Eur as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackWindDragon Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 personally, im proud of this set, its revolutionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Smeagle. Using the fusion you made is straight rape for your opponent. I'm dead serious. Ultimate Unstoppable OTK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Yes and no... Goes like this: Player 1: Mai gawd card iz sideways-8, hit directly! Player 2: *Magic Cylinder's* Player 1: *facepalm*...OH WAIT, MAGIC CYLINDER TARGETS NAO! (LolFailnami) But the effort to get it to 9000 in a single turn would take more cards than Exodia. It's still broken as hell, but it's tricky to use. At its best it would probably be a 3.T.K. By any chance, is this set going to have exactly 42 cards? Because it should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Yes and no... Goes like this: Player 1: Mai gawd card iz sideways-8' date=' hit directly! Player 2: *Magic Cylinder's* Player 1: *facepalm*...OH WAIT, MAGIC CYLINDER TARGETS NAO! (LolFailnami) But the effort to get it to 9000 in a single turn would take more cards than Exodia. It's still broken as hell, but it's tricky to use. At its best it would probably be a 3.T.K. By any chance, is this set going to have exactly 42 cards? Because it should.[/quote'] That last statement makes me want to make a God Version of Stardust Dragon. Still good though. ;D Why 42? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Yes and no... Goes like this: Player 1: Mai gawd card iz sideways-8' date=' hit directly! Player 2: *Magic Cylinder's* Player 1: *facepalm*...OH WAIT, MAGIC CYLINDER TARGETS NAO! (LolFailnami) But the effort to get it to 9000 in a single turn would take more cards than Exodia. It's still broken as hell, but it's tricky to use. At its best it would probably be a 3.T.K. By any chance, is this set going to have exactly 42 cards? Because it should.[/quote'] That last statement makes me want to make a God Version of Stardust Dragon. Still good though. ;D Why 42? 42 is the meaning of life, duh. >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Yes and no... Goes like this: Player 1: Mai gawd card iz sideways-8' date=' hit directly! Player 2: *Magic Cylinder's* Player 1: *facepalm*...OH WAIT, MAGIC CYLINDER TARGETS NAO! (LolFailnami) But the effort to get it to 9000 in a single turn would take more cards than Exodia. It's still broken as hell, but it's tricky to use. At its best it would probably be a 3.T.K. By any chance, is this set going to have exactly 42 cards? Because it should.[/quote'] That last statement makes me want to make a God Version of Stardust Dragon. Still good though. ;D Why 42? 42 is the meaning of life, duh. >_> I was just wondering. >: I wanted to go to 69. >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Yes and no... Goes like this: Player 1: Mai gawd card iz sideways-8' date=' hit directly! Player 2: *Magic Cylinder's* Player 1: *facepalm*...OH WAIT, MAGIC CYLINDER TARGETS NAO! (LolFailnami) But the effort to get it to 9000 in a single turn would take more cards than Exodia. It's still broken as hell, but it's tricky to use. At its best it would probably be a 3.T.K. By any chance, is this set going to have exactly 42 cards? Because it should.[/quote'] That last statement makes me want to make a God Version of Stardust Dragon. Still good though. ;D Why 42? 42 is the meaning of life, duh. >_> I was just wondering. >: I wanted to go to 69. >_> That's what she said. <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.