Dare I copy C.C.?

[Guest Zeonark]

[align=center]Maybe I do.

 

[spoiler=Lore]This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This monster cannot be Special Summoned except if you control 1 face-up "Scrap-Iron Junk Scavenger" and 1 face-down "Scrap-Iron" Spell or Trap card. Once per turn, if you have 3 or more Machine-Type monsters removed from play by the effect of "Scrap-Iron Junk Scavenger", you can destroy up to 2 cards on the field OR remove 2 cards in your opponent's Graveyard from play. If a card with "Scrap-Iron" in its name would be destroyed, you can remove 1 Machine-Type monster from play instead.

 

 

 

Schwert is German for Sword I believe. Correct me if I'm wrong. Also, it's a EARTH Machine because I said so. D:<

 

Gah. I wanted a better image but I was far too lazy to find one. So I just jumped into HP Doom's Archive and grabbed it. >_>

 

If you haven't figured out, this is a connection/support card for ♥Łövëły Ċ.Ċ♥'s new Scrap-Iron Junk Scavenger card. I figured it'd be cool if I did something like it. Plus, I really wanted to make atleast 1 card today.

 

...Not too proud of this right now. D:

 

Rate/Hate/Comment/CHECKOUTC.C.'SCARDSORDIE. Whatever.[/align]

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Lol nice ^^. It's effect is nice and supportive of my SI card ^^. But like i said before I'd really appreciate it if people would ask me if they could join into my idea's or use my cards or involve my cards in their own stuff :[

 

But idm right now ^^ I like this card although I didnt really think of the Scrap-Iron effects as being destructive to your Opponent (I'm talking about your effect about destroying cards on the field.

 

But thats up to you ^^

 

great card! 9/10

[Guest Zeonark]

Lol nice ^^. It's effect is nice and supportive of my SI card ^^. But like i said before I'd really appreciate it if people would ask me if they could join into my idea's or use my cards or involve my cards in their own stuff :[

 

But idm right now ^^ I like this card although I didnt really think of the Scrap-Iron effects as being destructive to your Opponent (I'm talking about your effect about destroying cards on the field.

 

But thats up to you ^^

 

great card! 9/10

 

Wait. You said that? Must've been before I registered. My bad, I'll ask next time.

 

I was a little indifferent about that part. But I figured it couldn't be all defense or saving. So I added to destroying your opponent's forces.

 

Lol. Thanks C.C.

[Susie]

Pretty good :)

9/10, could use a tiny bit more of work on the effect

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Lol nice ^^. It's effect is nice and supportive of my SI card ^^. But like i said before I'd really appreciate it if people would ask me if they could join into my idea's or use my cards or involve my cards in their own stuff :[

 

But idm right now ^^ I like this card although I didnt really think of the Scrap-Iron effects as being destructive to your Opponent (I'm talking about your effect about destroying cards on the field.

 

But thats up to you ^^

 

great card! 9/10

 

Wait. You said that? Must've been before I registered. My bad' date= I'll ask next time.

 

I was a little indifferent about that part. But I figured it couldn't be all defense or saving. So I added to destroying your opponent's forces.

 

Lol. Thanks C.C.

[/quote]

 

Lol nah it was when i posted my Cloud Thief set :3 but dont worry about it! it's perfectly fine it's mainly just for others. I'm used to you and a few others doing that so for your guys i dont mind ^^ it's for others.

 

And like i said it's up to you since these are really the only monsters under the Scrap-Iron name which means it doesnt really have a set idea. I just never saw it due to the way it's used, which is as a safeguard rather then a landmine. ^^ Still it works for this card.

[ragnarok1945]

it's just a testament to how well your cards are, LLD

 

now, as for this card itself

 

not this MONSTER cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. You're supposed to say This Card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set

 

that's pretty much it for OCG, the effect is quite balanced out (which is exactly what I expected if you're going to support LLD's cards), so I'll give it 9.3/10

[Guest JoshIcy]

So... All you did was slap 2 effects, and 1 summoning onto a single card? This card is not good at all. You don't have any sense of direction or flow in the idea. As Ive said many times, idc about language (ocg) like others. But this idea... Is... Incomplete.

 

It's like you forced this card into creation instead of letting the idea flow onto the card. It's a good thing I don't do number rates anymore, otherwise I'd make a lot of people feel bad =/...

 

edit: @Rag: the T in this is lower-cased in the middle of a sentence then the C is capitalized. Otherwise the T is capped at the beginning of a sentence and the C is lower-cased. This is summoning conditions. Different text type.

 

~And I cannot believe I just did a small OCG fix.

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Lol i know ^^ I love Zeonark :3 so Zeo's free to use my ideas and support my cards whenever the rule was just enforced for others ;3

 

Then of course I see an Icy comment and develope a new perspective. I like your comment's Icy they open new views for me. Although...I keep my comment. (I do see where you come from though.)

[Guest Zeonark]

Pretty good :)

9/10' date=' could use a tiny bit more of work on the effect

[/quote']

 

Thanks. <3

 

Lol nice ^^. It's effect is nice and supportive of my SI card ^^. But like i said before I'd really appreciate it if people would ask me if they could join into my idea's or use my cards or involve my cards in their own stuff :[

 

But idm right now ^^ I like this card although I didnt really think of the Scrap-Iron effects as being destructive to your Opponent (I'm talking about your effect about destroying cards on the field.

 

But thats up to you ^^

 

great card! 9/10

 

Wait. You said that? Must've been before I registered. My bad' date= I'll ask next time.

 

I was a little indifferent about that part. But I figured it couldn't be all defense or saving. So I added to destroying your opponent's forces.

 

Lol. Thanks C.C.

[/quote]

 

Lol nah it was when i posted my Cloud Thief set :3 but dont worry about it! it's perfectly fine it's mainly just for others. I'm used to you and a few others doing that so for your guys i dont mind ^^ it's for others.

 

And like i said it's up to you since these are really the only monsters under the Scrap-Iron name which means it doesnt really have a set idea. I just never saw it due to the way it's used, which is as a safeguard rather then a landmine. ^^ Still it works for this card.

 

Probably wasn't here by then. o: Thanks for letting me know. You know we all love helping out/making giftz. ;D

 

Lol. Well I could make a Archetype out of them to see if it works. I assumed they focused on removing Machine-Types to save cards with Scrap-Iron in their name.

 

Hmm...

 

it's just a testament to how well your cards are' date=' LLD

 

now, as for this card itself

 

not this MONSTER cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. You're supposed to say This Card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set

 

that's pretty much it for OCG, the effect is quite balanced out (which is exactly what I expected if you're going to support LLD's cards), so I'll give it 9.3/10

[/quote']

 

Fixed.

 

Thanks Ragna.

 

So... All you did was slap 2 effects' date=' and 1 summoning onto a single card? This card is not good at all. You don't have any sense of direction or flow in the idea. As Ive said many times, idc about language (ocg) like others. But this idea... Is... Incomplete.

 

It's like you forced this card into creation instead of letting the idea flow onto the card. It's a good thing I don't do number rates anymore, otherwise I'd make a lot of people feel bad =/... [/quote']

 

So what would you suggest if you're going to call it terrible?

 

Plus. That's probably it about the creation thing. /:

 

Lol i know ^^ I love Zeonark :3 so Zeo's free to use my ideas and support my cards whenever the rule was just enforced for others ;3

 

D'awwwww. Stop it you. ;D I'm bad at this anyway. Lul.

 

But since I'm free, expect lots of support. >D

[ragnarok1945]

Zeo, you're not the first person who went to support LLD's cards

 

you certainly won't be the last

[Guest JoshIcy]

So... All you did was slap 2 effects' date=' and 1 summoning onto a single card? This card is not good at all. You don't have any sense of direction or flow in the idea. As Ive said many times, idc about language (ocg) like others. But this idea... Is... Incomplete.

 

It's like you forced this card into creation instead of letting the idea flow onto the card. It's a good thing I don't do number rates anymore, otherwise I'd make a lot of people feel bad =/... [/quote']

 

So what would you suggest if you're going to call it terrible?

 

Plus. That's probably it about the creation thing. /:

 

I'd suggest you rework your idea from scratch. Figure out what you want it to do, instead of just making it do something. I really enjoy that someone is your muse, but don't just use them as a crutch.

[Guest Zeonark]

So... All you did was slap 2 effects' date=' and 1 summoning onto a single card? This card is not good at all. You don't have any sense of direction or flow in the idea. As Ive said many times, idc about language (ocg) like others. But this idea... Is... Incomplete.

 

It's like you forced this card into creation instead of letting the idea flow onto the card. It's a good thing I don't do number rates anymore, otherwise I'd make a lot of people feel bad =/... [/quote']

 

So what would you suggest if you're going to call it terrible?

 

Plus. That's probably it about the creation thing. /:

 

I'd suggest you rework your idea from scratch. Figure out what you want it to do, instead of just making it do something. I really enjoy that someone is your muse, but don't just use them as a crutch.

 

Redo it all together or make a different card?

 

Alrighty. I'll try again. Thanks Icy.

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

So Icy, by the "All you did was slap 2 effects" would you say that it seemed as if Zeonark didn't know whether or not the card should be a destructive or a stall card?

 

(That's kind of what I thought)