wero-vasto Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 [align=center] Just an Idea that I got ^^ 1st Idea! [spoiler=Lore]You receive no battle damage from a battle involving this card. If this card is destroyed by battle, destroy the monster that destroy it. Then Special Summon 1 "Shadow Token" to your side of the field. The "Shadow Token" has the same Level, Type, Attribute, ATK, and Def of the destroyed monster and gains its effect(s). All the battle damage that you would take from a battle involving the "Shadow Token" is inflicted to your opponent instead. 2nd Idea! ^^ [spoiler=Lore]You receive no battle damage from a battle involving this card. This card cannot be destroyed by battle by a level 6 or higher monster. If this card is destroyed by battle, destroy the monster that destroyed it. Then Special Summon 1 "Shadow Token" to your side of the field. The "Shadow Token" has the same Level, Type, Attribute, ATK, and Def of the destroyed monster. All the battle damage that you would take from a battle involving the "Shadow Token" is inflicted to your opponent instead. Love it, Hate it, Comment it... Whatever... just tell me what to fix ^^ Img. Credit: Jazin Kay ^^ [/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 2nd sentence the 2nd destroy should be destroyed the way you stated the token's stats, level, type and attribute sounds weird plus gaining its effects makes it OPed. You can get a free Judgment Dragon easily this way 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breakaway Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I'd say OPed only by the whole "Copycat" and were your oppoentn takes your damage with the Token if you say something like Both players not just your oppoennt or make a cost for the token But! other than that i reaally like it nice and creative 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Wick! Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Its nice, but it's kinda too much complicate =P 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted January 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 mmmm... I didn't notice the 2nd destroy xD well, that part of the OCG I take it from "Physical Double" and "Clone Duplication" and... well... I think the same :} I just want to see what other think in this Idea ^^ but yeah... the original Idea is without the effect (I'm talking about the Token^^) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 but that's just it with the token it can copy some VERY OPed monsters that way, and you get to bypass the summoning requirements and everything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lefty Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Awesome cardlike the effect10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted January 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 yeah yeah I get it ^^ I'm just saying that I forget it when I do the card Lol But actually it wasn't supposed to have the monster effect :S I'm going to change it in a bit ^^ EDIT: Thanks for the 10/10 faris^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 even then, copying the monster's stats is too much as well Suppose your opponent had 5 Headed Dragon on the field. I don't find getting a free 5000/5000 monster balancing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted January 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Yeah mmm.... I get it u.u I have and Idea Behind ^^ but I try with this one ^^ I'm thinking on a restriction for the Token ^^ wait the edit in a while ^^ EDIT: Thanks Everyone^^now added a new idea ^^ comment :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted January 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 BUMP >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 the 2nd idea is the same as the first, do something new please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.