JG. Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 [align=center]If this card is Summoned between 0AM and 12PM, it is treated as a LIGHT Attribute monster. If this card is Summoned between 12PM and 0AM, it is treated as a DARK Attribute monster. If this card inflicts direct damage to your opponent, you may change the Attribute of this card to LIGHT or DARK. Don't say I didn't warn you xD This card can attack twice per turn. If this card destroys a monster by battle, you can negate the battle damage to inflict damage to your opponent equal to the number of cards that have been destroyed while this card has been on the field x100. Not as bad, but still kinda wierd, certainly new. Found these new images by Night Walker, I just had to use them.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raylen Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 Great. Now everyone wants to duel at night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 Great use of time differences. Although, this is...very unusual. The MSN chat tells you all. 8.4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted February 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 @Raylen: True dat. But that hurt anybody? Lol. Thanks guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted February 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 haha, really weird effect you got there! xD The effect is not that useful if not used in a DARK/LIGHT Deck that rely on Attribute changing 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 LIGHT attribute monster is supposed to be LIGHT monster, we already know LIGHT is an attribute the same goes with DARK attribute monster now that is among the weirdest effects I've seen on a card a shame you did not put according to who's time zone though, that would have made things a lot more interesting 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 @rag, then it would be LONG effect if he had put out all 24 time zones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 I never said anything about putting ALL of the time zones just one time zone is enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 @rag' date=' then it would be LONG effect if he had put out all 24 time zones[/quote'] I think he was referring to online dueling? It's often that I'd Summon this when my opponent is 12 hours away. Either way, I don't like the first card, it practically gives a player a legit reason to refuse to play for up to 11 hours;59 - since it has a noticeable influence on gameplay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted February 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 In teh time zone that your dueling in, nub. Use your brain =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 In teh time zone that your dueling in' date=' nub. Use your brain =P[/quote'] I'm dueling someone in Cali on YVD.O darn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 I lol'd at the first effect. And second is just... weird. LEVEL 6/ ATK 2700/ATTACK TWICE PER TURN 2 direct attacks = 5400 damage. lolwat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duplicitous Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 9.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted February 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 I lol'd at the first effect. And second is just... weird. LEVEL 6/ ATK 2700/ATTACK TWICE PER TURN 2 direct attacks = 5400 damage. lolwat? One word - Goyo. @Griffin - Just agree on which to use =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 This thread belongs in AoC if only for the first card. It's an Unhinged Card =/... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 I lol'd at the first effect. And second is just... weird. LEVEL 6/ ATK 2700/ATTACK TWICE PER TURN 2 direct attacks = 5400 damage. lolwat? One word - Goyo. @Griffin - Just agree on which to use =P lol no. I was not talking about the ATK because of it's Level. I am talking about his effect. This - http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Twinheaded_BeastLevel 6/ATK 1700 = Max damage: 3400 Your card. Level 6/ATK 2700 = Max damage: 5400 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Dimercurio Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Picture: 10/10. OCG: 10/10. Total: 10/10. Amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted February 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 I lol'd at the first effect. And second is just... weird. LEVEL 6/ ATK 2700/ATTACK TWICE PER TURN 2 direct attacks = 5400 damage. lolwat? One word - Goyo. @Griffin - Just agree on which to use =P lol no. I was not talking about the ATK because of it's Level. I am talking about his effect. This - http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Twinheaded_BeastLevel 6/ATK 1700 = Max damage: 3400 Your card. Level 6/ATK 2700 = Max damage: 5400 I was meaning that Goyo is equally OP'ed. And need I mention, DSF...? EDIT: Icy, what you be meaning with that? It's perfectly realistic, just innovative =/ Why you move? You said if only for the first =/ You be contradicting yourself, and I see no sense in the move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ash_202457 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 The first one will go great with my shadow game deck, kinda weird though.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.