I don't make cards often anymore

[Jazin Kay]

 

I hope I can make it up to you with this.

 

In b4 Ragnarok bullies it up with falsified demands of effect limitations.

[Jazin Kay]

Your post was entirely useless.

 

I want you to realize that.

[Sephiroth_The_Legend]

certainly on the op'ed side of cards......

easily abusable and able to hit high attacks easily....possibly add a max counter limit or reduce the atk increase (maybe 200?)

 

otherwise, an easily runnable card in Spell Counter Decks and any others cause the art is awesome..

 

9/10

[Jazin Kay]

It can only gain a Spell Counter already on the field, and subtracts 2 simply to be summoned. She can be Tribute Summoned, but the choice is yours. My entire intent was to create a good card, not a card that people will look at and say "....oh, it can't do this/that/etc". It's not like it can't be instantly destroyed by an effect that a normal (IE "good") player would use to disable it, though. But no one ever considers that argument. Too easy of one. Lol.

 

If it's OPed, oh well. I'll care later.

[Sephiroth_The_Legend]

thats not hard.

 

Spell Power Grasp gives spell counters. and is a spell, so thats 2.

Then any other spell you activate (say your running a D-Draw engine, easily 5-6 spells a turn)

thats 3-4k atk...im fair sure that's borderline op...

[Jazin Kay]

Oh good, "borderline". I love that term.

 

That means you don't hate it and want it to die.

 

I think.

[ragnarok1945]

2000 base atk is just fine for a lv5

 

but it still needs to have a max atk limit, which you can do by simply limit the number of spell counters you can put on this card, otherwise it'd get OPed

 

9/10

[-Griffin]

2000 base atk is just fine for a lv5

 

but it still needs to have a max atk limit' date=' which you can do by simply limit the number of spell counters you can put on this card, otherwise it'd get OPed

 

9/10

[/quote']

 

You are wrong again. Stop acting like you know anything about balance, it's making plenty of people in this section who fall for your idiocy make bad choices.

 

The card is fine. The last two effects are decent, but the first is great since it can help to speed up Arcanite with Nights End (I think that's the right Tuner)

 

Pretty decent/runnable card.

[Duplicitous]

9.5/10

[Masey 4 AVFC]

Good card with good OCG 10/10

[Menace13]

2000 base atk is just fine for a lv5

 

but it still needs to have a max atk limit' date=' which you can do by simply limit the number of spell counters you can put on this card, otherwise it'd get OPed

 

9/10

[/quote']

 

You are wrong again. Stop acting like you know anything about balance, it's making plenty of people in this section who fall for your idiocy make bad choices.

 

The card is fine. The last two effects are decent, but the first is great since it can help to speed up Arcanite with Nights End (I think that's the right Tuner)

 

Pretty decent/runnable card.

 

You are wrong. Ragnarok is right. Just use something to put three Spell Counters on this card and it has 1500 ATK off the bat. It definitely needs a limit on the amount of Spell Counters it can have, or have the last effect just remove all of them to negate and destroy a card that would destroy it.

 

OP, but otherwise a good card. 8.2/10