Cloister Posted February 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2010 thank you! :Dadded raw power monster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Added another card guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alordzynix Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 "Fierce Alphabetic Warrior M" is a nice addition, it makes normal monster support like "Birthright" better play abale with the set because now it can summon a 2400 ATK Beat stick or a monster needed as a tribute for a commander.  You surprised me with "Alphabetic Warrior C", I thought that would be a normal monster. But this way ABC commander can be summoned easier so it is a good thing. I also don't really understand the ATK decrease part (why it is added) but it doesn't hurt the card much because it looks like it would only be used as a tribute fodder.  As for "Alphabetic Sword QR", it definitely nice to have a card that increases ATK, but I think 200 might be a little to weak. Even with out being archetype specific it is too weak. Personally, looking at the monsters right now I would change it to 400 per counter with out changing anything else. Also, why do you place the counters on the monster and not on the equip card? Just a little Note, I only count 7 Cards, I think you counted Beast DEF twice in your update histroy. Are there going to be more name related cards like Alphabetic Commander ABC and Rune's World? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Well, for the 7 Vanilla Q, I changed that, to 7 because I had already made up my mind on 19 cards total and I needed more support cards so that is why, but 7 is still not litlle. I will change the 200 ATK to 400, but I felt 400 was pretty much (equipped to M, it gets 3600) for a Level 5 And for last Q, yes, there will be nother "set" of three "A.W" "Z,Y and X" and maybe a dragon or another beast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alordzynix Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Well' date=' for the 7 Vanilla Q, I changed that, to 7 because I had already made up my mind on 19 cards total and I needed more support cards so that is why, but 7 is still not litlle.[/quote']You missunderstood me, I mean you say 8/19, I only count 7. I will change the 200 ATK to 400' date=' but I felt 400 was pretty much (equipped to M, it gets 3600) for a Level 5[/quote']It needs to attack or be attacked 3 times for that. There are easier ways to pump up a monsters ATK with 1200. And for last Q' date=' yes, there will be nother "set" of three "A.W" "Z,Y and X" and maybe a dragon or another beast[/quote']I think you missunderstood me, I ment cards that would focus on removing the same cards from your opponent's deck. Sorry if I was unclear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Well' date=' for the 7 Vanilla Q, I changed that, to 7 because I had already made up my mind on 19 cards total and I needed more support cards so that is why, but 7 is still not litlle.[/quote']You missunderstood me, I mean you say 8/19, I only count 7. Changed I will change the 200 ATK to 400' date=' but I felt 400 was pretty much (equipped to M, it gets 3600) for a Level 5[/quote']It needs to attack or be attacked 3 times for that. There are easier ways to pump up a monsters ATK with 1200. And for last Q' date=' yes, there will be nother "set" of three "A.W" "Z,Y and X" and maybe a dragon or another beast[/quote']I think you missunderstood me, I ment cards that would focus on removing the same cards from your opponent's deck. Sorry if I was unclear Yes, yes there will be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 Nice new cards, like the name removal, it could really mess with some decks (Like Lightsworn or Zombie).I would give the rest a 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 Thanks you Lex, will update maybe with 1 more card today :] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigiMaster Ragnarok Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 looks okay, pics are good, effects are okay but a little OPed, if not close too 8/10Good effort, I'd like to see what u hve in store for the rest of this set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legolover09 Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 hurry up and make more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scatty Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Great last card there, I must say. Finally, a monster that looks bossy. You sure know how to accept advices, Tom my boy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 I have made 1 more strong monster that can almost take on BEWDAnd the Final Card is like RD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Nice new cards. Like to see a use for a imo hard to use pic (Trap).Don't really like the text of O. May want to change it.A 8.3/10 for the Trap.A 7/10 for O. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 I wanted to just have a simple text, but I'll change it, don't actually like it that much myselfThx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest War Torn Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Looks great9.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Thanks Striker! Anything I can change to make it 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scatty Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Fierce O has a lame text. The trap is badly overpowerd, I must say. It must have an every turn cost, say 500, and make it compulsory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest War Torn Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Fierce O has a lame text. The trap is badly overpowerd' date=' I must say. It must have an every turn cost, say 500, and make it compulsory.[/quote'] ^This Tom^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 I will add some restriction to the Trap Card, and I will change the text on the monster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alordzynix Posted February 18, 2010 Report Share Posted February 18, 2010 The trap indeed is a bit overpowered with out a cost, but it is yet another very interesting card. Fierce Alphabetic Warrior O could use another 300 to 400 ATK, right now I don't see a reason for him to have such a low ATK. Alphabetic Warrior B has a nice high DEF and was pretty much what I expected of it (except for the exact stats of courxe =P). And last but not least your Fierce Alphabetic Commander MN is yet again another very interessting card, but seems a bit overpowered. I think that M and N need to be removed from the Graveyard because otherwise you could summon 3 at once pretty easy and the Removal effect should be once per turn to balance it out. Â These are some very nice additions and right now I would give you a 8.5/10 for the set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raymond5577 Posted February 18, 2010 Report Share Posted February 18, 2010 Lol, I so freaking like the new vanilla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 19, 2010 Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 now that I'm back I can return to rating these as with the ones before, you're doing great in there originally I thought these were bordering OPed, now I see they're much more balanced 9.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest War Torn Posted February 19, 2010 Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 now that I'm back I can return to rating these as with the ones before' date=' you're doing great in there originally I thought these were bordering OPed, now I see they're much more balanced 9.7/10[/quote'] Well for once I can agree with you. Sorry for flamming you the other day. I really didn't like it when I posted my first cards with my recent cards to show how I improved to get knocked down. I don't agree with the 9.7/10. I give it a 9.2/10 ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2010 Hi, I haven't been able to fix all the stuff you gouys have mentioned and won't today either D:But maybe tomorrow or in 2 days and thanks for the comments all! : D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.