Jump to content

[Tom] The Alphabetic Core mini-Set *11/19* - Monster and Trap Added -


Cloister

Is this set any good?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Is this set any good?

    • Awesome dude!
      9
    • Yes, it's good
      6
    • No, horrible!
      2


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

"Fierce Alphabetic Warrior M" is a nice addition, it makes normal monster support like "Birthright" better play abale with the set because now it can summon a 2400 ATK Beat stick or a monster needed as a tribute for a commander.

 

You surprised me with "Alphabetic Warrior C", I thought that would be a normal monster. But this way ABC commander can be summoned easier so it is a good thing. I also don't really understand the ATK decrease part (why it is added) but it doesn't hurt the card much because it looks like it would only be used as a tribute fodder.

 

As for "Alphabetic Sword QR", it definitely nice to have a card that increases ATK, but I think 200 might be a little to weak. Even with out being archetype specific it is too weak. Personally, looking at the monsters right now I would change it to 400 per counter with out changing anything else. Also, why do you place the counters on the monster and not on the equip card?

 

Just a little Note, I only count 7 Cards, I think you counted Beast DEF twice in your update histroy.

 

Are there going to be more name related cards like Alphabetic Commander ABC and Rune's World?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, for the 7 Vanilla Q, I changed that, to 7 because I had already made up my mind on 19 cards total and I needed more support cards so that is why, but 7 is still not litlle.

 

I will change the 200 ATK to 400, but I felt 400 was pretty much (equipped to M, it gets 3600) for a Level 5

 

And for last Q, yes, there will be nother "set" of three "A.W" "Z,Y and X" and maybe a dragon or another beast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well' date=' for the 7 Vanilla Q, I changed that, to 7 because I had already made up my mind on 19 cards total and I needed more support cards so that is why, but 7 is still not litlle.

[/quote']

You missunderstood me, I mean you say 8/19, I only count 7.

 

I will change the 200 ATK to 400' date=' but I felt 400 was pretty much (equipped to M, it gets 3600) for a Level 5

[/quote']

It needs to attack or be attacked 3 times for that. There are easier ways to pump up a monsters ATK with 1200.

 

And for last Q' date=' yes, there will be nother "set" of three "A.W" "Z,Y and X" and maybe a dragon or another beast

[/quote']

I think you missunderstood me, I ment cards that would focus on removing the same cards from your opponent's deck.

 

Sorry if I was unclear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well' date=' for the 7 Vanilla Q, I changed that, to 7 because I had already made up my mind on 19 cards total and I needed more support cards so that is why, but 7 is still not litlle.

[/quote']

You missunderstood me, I mean you say 8/19, I only count 7.

 

Changed

 

I will change the 200 ATK to 400' date=' but I felt 400 was pretty much (equipped to M, it gets 3600) for a Level 5

[/quote']

It needs to attack or be attacked 3 times for that. There are easier ways to pump up a monsters ATK with 1200.

 

And for last Q' date=' yes, there will be nother "set" of three "A.W" "Z,Y and X" and maybe a dragon or another beast

[/quote']

I think you missunderstood me, I ment cards that would focus on removing the same cards from your opponent's deck.

 

Sorry if I was unclear

 

Yes, yes there will be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest War Torn

Fierce O has a lame text.

 

The trap is badly overpowerd' date=' I must say. It must have an every turn cost, say 500, and make it compulsory.

[/quote']

 

^This Tom^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trap indeed is a bit overpowered with out a cost, but it is yet another very interesting card. Fierce Alphabetic Warrior O could use another 300 to 400 ATK, right now I don't see a reason for him to have such a low ATK. Alphabetic Warrior B has a nice high DEF and was pretty much what I expected of it (except for the exact stats of courxe =P).

And last but not least your Fierce Alphabetic Commander MN is yet again another very interessting card, but seems a bit overpowered. I think that M and N need to be removed from the Graveyard because otherwise you could summon 3 at once pretty easy and the Removal effect should be once per turn to balance it out.

 

These are some very nice additions and right now I would give you a 8.5/10 for the set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest War Torn

now that I'm back I can return to rating these

 

as with the ones before' date=' you're doing great in there

 

originally I thought these were bordering OPed, now I see they're much more balanced

 

9.7/10

[/quote']

 

Well for once I can agree with you. Sorry for flamming you the other day. I really didn't like it when I posted my first cards with my recent cards to show how I improved to get knocked down. I don't agree with the 9.7/10. I give it a 9.2/10 ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...