Guest JoshIcy Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 And I say if I catch you swearing in CC again, I'll ban you without a second thought. Thread Titles included. Last card is... Wow... lol. Non-Spellcasting Area just became semi-broken me thinks xD. But whatever... Balance on that card is iffy either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted February 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 bad. all bad. reason:1. how is it even possible to play a game with monsters that doesn't even have any attribute? it's like driving a car without an engine... worthless with out it.2. all have the same ATK and DEF... wtf...3. names are WAY too unoriginal...the only thing that was good was the ocg' date=' and even there the card would be broken.3/10 from me.[/quote'] I lol'd. I'm not sure what your goal with the archtype thing was... the card reads like you're making all the archtype monsters into Vanillas... I mean' date=' that doesn't change spell synergy, and it doesn't change the fact that they have effects... it just gives them the benefit of synergizing with "Birthright" and "Silent Doom" and all that... If you're trying to remove the archtype, then you need to reword the effect... and this guy would be illegal anyways. Type lockdown ticks the meta off. Attribute lockdown nails a few spikes into the meta. Archtype lockdown... well, the meta would disintegrate. No "Lightsworn", no "Blackwing", no "Gladiator Beast", no "Destiny Hero"... heck, this goes even as far as stopping "Elemental Heroes" and "Guardian" monsters (even the cruddy fun decks!). Too strong. Get rid of it. Do something about ? ATK/DEF monsters...[/quote'] Most people run Effect Monsters, right? If they're treated as Normal Monsters, their effects won't work, right?And no. I won't get rid of it D: And I say if I catch you swearing in CC again' date=' I'll ban you without a second thought. Thread Titles included. Last card is... Wow... lol. Non-Spellcasting Area just became semi-broken me thinks xD. But whatever... Balance on that card is iffy either way.[/quote'] I can still say, 'screw', at least, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoAreYou? Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 bad. all bad. reason:1. how is it even possible to play a game with monsters that doesn't even have any attribute? it's like driving a car without an engine... worthless with out it.2. all have the same ATK and DEF... wtf...3. names are WAY too unoriginal...the only thing that was good was the ocg' date=' and even there the card would be broken.3/10 from me.[/quote'] I lol'd. I'm not sure what your goal with the archtype thing was... the card reads like you're making all the archtype monsters into Vanillas... I mean' date=' that doesn't change spell synergy, and it doesn't change the fact that they have effects... it just gives them the benefit of synergizing with "Birthright" and "Silent Doom" and all that... If you're trying to remove the archtype, then you need to reword the effect... and this guy would be illegal anyways. Type lockdown ticks the meta off. Attribute lockdown nails a few spikes into the meta. Archtype lockdown... well, the meta would disintegrate. No "Lightsworn", no "Blackwing", no "Gladiator Beast", no "Destiny Hero"... heck, this goes even as far as stopping "Elemental Heroes" and "Guardian" monsters (even the cruddy fun decks!). Too strong. Get rid of it. Do something about ? ATK/DEF monsters...[/quote'] Most people run Effect Monsters, right? If they're treated as Normal Monsters, their effects won't work, right?And no. I won't get rid of it D: And I say if I catch you swearing in CC again' date=' I'll ban you without a second thought. Thread Titles included. Last card is... Wow... lol. Non-Spellcasting Area just became semi-broken me thinks xD. But whatever... Balance on that card is iffy either way.[/quote'] I can still say, 'screw', at least, right? why did u lol? and yes you CAN still say 'screw' but don't expect people to like you all that much. people like other people who curse less. adults, anyway, so when you're 5 years older (not that i know HOW old you are...) people are expecting you to be more mature and polite....LMFAO i can't believe i said that. i wish it wasn't true =( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightm@re-X Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 Cool effects!Cool Pics!Cool Names!if these cards weren't gemini,it would be very little overpowered,because if it wasn't a gemini monster,you can just summon him on the field and then bye bye to your ATTRIBUTE,TYPE,EFFECTS without any Sacrifices or paying to the effects.I give it 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted February 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 why did u lol? and yes you CAN still say 'screw' but don't expect people to like you all that much. people like other people who curse less. adults' date=' anyway, so when you're 5 years older (not that i know HOW old you are...) people are expecting you to be more mature and polite....LMFAO i can't believe i said that. i wish it wasn't true =([/quote'] I had the F-word, (Still possibly being watched by Icy >,>), in my title, and you're saying this, now?And it also depends on who you hang around with. If you're really close to someone, it won't matter if you curse or not. =/And I cursed around adults. They didn't care. And they don't know me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 And I say if I catch you swearing in CC again' date=' I'll ban you without a second thought. Thread Titles included. Last card is... Wow... lol. Non-Spellcasting Area just became semi-broken me thinks xD. But whatever... Balance on that card is iffy either way.[/quote'] I can still say, 'screw', at least, right? Yeah I guess lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted February 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 And I say if I catch you swearing in CC again' date=' I'll ban you without a second thought. Thread Titles included. Last card is... Wow... lol. Non-Spellcasting Area just became semi-broken me thinks xD. But whatever... Balance on that card is iffy either way.[/quote'] I can still say, 'screw', at least, right? Yeah I guess lol I hardly ever get a straight answer these days D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 For as strict as I am in CC, I'm equally as passionate and understanding xD. Gotta give me that. And that's a straight answer as far as I can tell o_O... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Dimercurio Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 Picture: 10/10. O my god they are amazing. OCG: 10/10. Ehhh not bad. {Joking the are f*cking awesome.} Total: 10/10. Awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 You should add an ATK/DEF reduce monster and a Level reduce monsterLove these, though last card would negate these other 2 cards' effects due to all card are treated as Normal Monsters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted February 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 You should add an ATK/DEF reduce monster and a Level reduce monsterLove these' date=' though last card would negate these other 2 cards' effects due to all card are treated as Normal Monsters[/quote'] The third monster is mainly for last resorts =/ I guess I can make a ATK/DEF destroyer and a Level destoyer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 Well, that's true.But I love the idea of these cards, you could easily make a set of them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-6 Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 I dont think name forgetters effect technicly works concidering that Archtype has never been accually defined in the game. but who cares these cards are deffinately creative.bad Decks as in Iron Chain Decks are bad? I like Iron Chain Decks. (Though honestly my best one only has a 60% or so win record.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted February 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 Well' date=' that's true.But I love the idea of these cards, you could easily make a set of them![/quote'] Meh. I wasn't planning on it. I dont think name forgetters effect technicly works concidering that Archtype has never been accually defined in the game. but who cares these cards are deffinately creative. Well, technically, it's also also defined. At first I wanted to put it to where monsters share the same part in their name, example Lightsworn. But that was an Archtype, so.....But it's mainly a unique card, so it's not actually not your answer, but not mine either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
why me Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 nice it puts an end to most attribute and type related power ups. the fact that they're gemini monsters evens out thier power. 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sychoshadows Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 Crazy idea first one 10/102nd 10/10third 9/10...im not likeing the word "archtype" i feel like "archtype monsters" wouldnt be used on a card. i can't thing of a better way of putting it then that, archtypes are debateable. are clowns an archtype? dragons, what about the dragons that are really sea serpent types? dark named monsters? and the fact that why normal monsters? you still get the card effects other then monster effects, and things liek alien shocktrooper are already normal. how about something like, negates the effects of cards that designate a specific card name, or word within the card name? just an idea, i like them very much tho =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted February 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 third 9/10...im not likeing the word "archtype" i feel like "archtype monsters" wouldnt be used on a card. i can't thing of a better way of putting it then that' date=' archtypes are debateable. are clowns an archtype? dragons, what about the dragons that are really sea serpent types? dark named monsters? and the fact that why normal monsters? you still get the card effects other then monster effects, and things liek alien shocktrooper are already normal. how about something like, negates the effects of cards that designate a specific card name, or word within the card name? just an idea, i like them very much tho =D[/quote'] But depending on how it's worded, that's also quite hard for correct OCGing.But they're all Original OCG, from what I was told. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FSBolthof Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 I have got to say that these cards are very special and with good pictures and effects. The only thing is that I should give it a negative side effect as well for you. It is a big thing if you remove type, attribute and archtype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigedf Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 Pretty cool cards, very original! Wouldn't "Name Forgettor" negate his own effect because it would be classified as a Normal Monster again instead of a Gemini/Effect monster? 8.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted February 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 I have got to say that these cards are very special and with good pictures and effects. The only thing is that I should give it a negative side effect as well for you. It is a big thing if you remove type' date=' attribute and archtype.[/quote'] Gemini's are treated as a Normal Monster during the turn they are first Summoned. pie is good Get out.Now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoAreYou? Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 I have got to say that these cards are very special and with good pictures and effects. The only thing is that I should give it a negative side effect as well for you. It is a big thing if you remove type' date=' attribute and archtype.[/quote'] Gemini's are treated as a Normal Monster during the turn they are first Summoned. pie is good Get out.Now. i'm not sure, but i think he meant "pic" with a 'c'... pic is good, pics are good... you know. just saying.AND STOP GETTING PISSED OFF! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted February 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 I have got to say that these cards are very special and with good pictures and effects. The only thing is that I should give it a negative side effect as well for you. It is a big thing if you remove type' date=' attribute and archtype.[/quote'] Gemini's are treated as a Normal Monster during the turn they are first Summoned. pie is good Get out.Now. i'm not sure' date=' but i think he meant "pic" with a 'c'... pic is good, pics are good... you know. just saying.AND STOP GETTING PISSED OFF![/quote'] The E key and the C key, are not even that close to begin with.Yeah, a bit, but not so close where you can mistype them like the T and the Y key. And who's getting pissed off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grunt Issun Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 this is awsome, it deletes any deck involving archtype support, element decks, and type users, so cards like magcians valkeriya, elemental heros and ultimate baseball kid are useless 9.9/10 ooooooh so close Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leturn Master Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 I'm not sure what your goal with the archtype thing was... the card reads like you're making all the archtype monsters into Vanillas... I mean' date=' that doesn't change spell synergy, and it doesn't change the fact that they have effects... it just gives them the benefit of synergizing with "Birthright" and "Silent Doom" and all that... If you're trying to remove the archtype, then you need to reword the effect... and this guy would be illegal anyways. Type lockdown ticks the meta off. Attribute lockdown nails a few spikes into the meta. Archtype lockdown... well, the meta would disintegrate. No "Lightsworn", no "Blackwing", no "Gladiator Beast", no "Destiny Hero"... heck, this goes even as far as stopping "Elemental Heroes" and "Guardian" monsters (even the cruddy fun decks!). Too strong. Get rid of it. Do something about ? ATK/DEF monsters...[/quote'] Most people run Effect Monsters, right? If they're treated as Normal Monsters, their effects won't work, right?And no. I won't get rid of it D: If they're just treated like Normal Monsters, no. This card would just make all Effect monsters better. Read "Skill Drain". OP no matter what you do, but if you ain't changin' it, then there's nothing more I have to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrazyK Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Good cards, good effects, and I always appreciate Geminis. I would like to see some support for these cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.