Toffee. Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 In-Game Monster - 20Smoke Ball x3Nimbusman x3Sheep Cloud x3Storm Dragon x3Turbulence x3Morph JarMother Grizzley x3Sangan Spell - 13Brain ControlCloudian Squall x3Creature Seizure x3Creature Swap x3Fog ControlTrunadeHeavy Storm Trap - 7Magic Arm Shield x3 - For teh lulz?/This card is awesome hereMirror ForceSolemnTorrentialTrap Dustshoot Rate/Fix? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T3RA PROWL3R Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 I've always wanted to make a Cloudian deck. Looks like a pretty good deck. -1 Creature Swap+1 Salvage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 I've always wanted to make a Cloudian deck. Looks like a pretty good deck. -1 Creature Swap+1 Salvage .....To be honest, Salvage seems a bit un-needed.Though it seems like an interesting idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.dek Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 ooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh but i thought swap was semi'd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T3RA PROWL3R Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 You could prolly have 2 of each of the Cloudian monsters and add some frogs or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord dmoc Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 You could prolly have 2 of each of the Cloudian monsters and add some frogs or something. No, it's a cloudian deck. Ghost Fog? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 -Facepalm- Why would you want Frogs in a Cloudian Deck? OT: Love the Smoke Swapping Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T3RA PROWL3R Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Just because he calls it a Cloudian deck doesn't mean he is limited to what cards he can put into the deck. And it was just a suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monztor Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 YAY! Another cloudian user =D Turbulence + Smokeball was what got me started on them. I pulled a good 9 Smokeballs from my Glad assault packs so I decided why not. I'll give you the same advice that was given to me. - Sheep Cloud [2]- Smoke Ball [1]- Sangan- Mother Grizzly [1]- Storm Dragon [1]- Nimbusman [1]+ Cloudian - Cirrostratus [2]+ Cloudian - Altus [2]+ Skreech [2] + Cloudian - Acid Cloud [1] I'd say take out at least one smokeball. When you're looking for a game changer, smokeball isn't gonna make you happy, no matter how cute it is. You gotta add more of the other cloudians =D Cirro provides for monster destruction, acid for spell and trap, and altus for hand destruction. Skreech is very helpful as you can use it to throw your throw smokeball's into the grave before they become a bad draw. and combined with salvage, you can pretty much choose what ever two clouds you want to add to your hand. I'm assuming your win condition involves getting Nimbusman as a ridiculously powerful beatstick. As for spell support, you could really use Sanctuary in the Sky, Moray of Greed, and Salvage =) If you can't get your hands on sanctuary though, you can go with Spirit Barriers. I props for using smokeball + turbulence! Lol. Edit: I believe it was Griffin who helped me out with my cloud deck when I first started =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 You could prolly have 2 of each of the Cloudian monsters and add some frogs or something.WhatisthisIdonteven... Ghost Fog?Ghost Fog is too slow for this build' date=' as it isnt centered around the usual Cloudains OT: Love the Smoke SwappingSo do I <3 Just because he calls it a Cloudian deck doesn't mean he is limited to what cards he can put into the deck.Its called "Staying on track". YAY! Another cloudian user =DIts ben ages since I made a Cloudian Deck.And Vanillas are always fun :3 - Sheep Cloud [2]- Smoke Ball [1]- Sangan- Mother Grizzly [1]- Storm Dragon [1]- Nimbusman [1]+ Cloudian - Cirrostratus [2]+ Cloudian - Altus [2]+ Skreech [2] + Cloudian - Acid Cloud [1]Your wanting to me to make this more cloudian based' date=' when this deck is effectivly just a "Hey look, I just switched you powerful monster with a low ATK Cloudian monster. And guess what, it [i']HAS[/i] to remain in attack position!" sort of thing. Keeping Smoke Ball and Sheep Cloud in 3s means I have more targets for Creature Seizure.Which is one of the main mechanics this deck can abuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monztor Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Lol, sorry, I'm just a fan of using cirro and altus. Anyway, skreech still seems like a good addition to this deck. It fits with your "i'mma give you this monster, then kill it to get activate it's effect theme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Lol' date=' sorry, I'm just a fan of using cirro and altus. Anyway, skreech still seems like a good addition to this deck. It fits with your "i'mma give you this monster, then kill it to get activate it's effect theme.[/quote'] Skreech isnt as effective as an attack position Thunder Dragon, Sheep Cloud, or Smoke Ball. Though, I'm thinking about swapping Squal with 3 Book of Moons(or something like that)Since Turbulence only really needs to use his effect once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbdnate Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 Cloudians are sex with Oppression... I built a Cloud Oppression deck once, it was boss... On the game... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.