Jump to content

Necro Gardna


Recommended Posts

Necro did not need to be touched at all. This is just classic Konami over-limiting an archetype. Even friends of mine who absolutely HATE Lightsworns were saying that what Konami did was too much.

 

Necro Gardna wasn't even a problem card, there was no reason for him to be limited at all, or even Semi'd for that matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD is less of a problem than Lumina + Garoth.

How?

 

JD: Field clearer with 3000 ATK

 

Lumina + Garoth: 2850 ATK and the ability to bring back a monster and give you some draw at the end of the turn.

 

Over all I'd rather deal with 3 monsters then a monster that makes me loss my whole field.

 

Ditto, but I guess Lumina x3 + Garoth is too much potential hand advantage... even though it mills the top 15 cards of your deck, more if you actually hit monsters with Garoth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD is less of a problem than Lumina + Garoth.

How?

 

JD: Field clearer with 3000 ATK

 

Lumina + Garoth: 2850 ATK and the ability to bring back a monster and give you some draw at the end of the turn.

 

Over all I'd rather deal with 3 monsters then a monster that makes me loss my whole field.

 

Ditto' date=' but I guess Lumina x3 + Garoth is too much potential hand advantage... even though it mills the top 15 cards of your deck, more if you actually hit monsters with Garoth.

[/quote']

Yes, but that uses 4 cards and to get it you need a lot of luck or set up. JD is 1 card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD is less of a problem than Lumina + Garoth.

How?

 

JD: Field clearer with 3000 ATK

 

Lumina + Garoth: 2850 ATK and the ability to bring back a monster and give you some draw at the end of the turn.

 

Over all I'd rather deal with 3 monsters then a monster that makes me loss my whole field.

 

Ditto' date=' but I guess Lumina x3 + Garoth is too much potential hand advantage... even though it mills the top 15 cards of your deck, more if you actually hit monsters with Garoth.

[/quote']

Yes, but that uses 4 cards and to get it you need a lot of luck or set up. JD is 1 card.

 

Did I really need to add [sarcasm][/sarcasm] to that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD is less of a problem than Lumina + Garoth.

How?

 

JD: Field clearer with 3000 ATK

 

Lumina + Garoth: 2850 ATK and the ability to bring back a monster and give you some draw at the end of the turn.

 

Over all I'd rather deal with 3 monsters then a monster that makes me loss my whole field.

 

Ditto' date=' but I guess Lumina x3 + Garoth is too much potential hand advantage... even though it mills the top 15 cards of your deck, more if you actually hit monsters with Garoth.

[/quote']

Yes, but that uses 4 cards and to get it you need a lot of luck or set up. JD is 1 card.

 

Did I really need to add [sarcasm][/sarcasm] to that?

Sarcasm is hard to read on the internet. The fact that people find that combo worse then JD only makes it harder to tell if some one if joking or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...