[Chird97] Red Eyes

[chrid97]

[align=center]Red Eyes' Royal Knight

Warrior/Effect/Dark/ATK 1900/DEF 1000

****

 

 

This card is also treated as a Fiend-Type monster. Each time this card destroys a opponent's monster by battle, place 1 Red-Eyes Counter on it. (Max. 4). You can remove 4 Red-Eyes Counters from this card and send 2 cards from your hand to the Graveyard to Special Summon 1 "Red-Eyes B. Dragon" from your hand, Deck, or Graveyard.

 

Red-Eyes Black Knight Warrior

Warrior/Effect/Dark/ATK 3000/DEF 2500

**********

 

 

Red Eyes Black Dragon + Red Eyes' Royal Knight

This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type and Dragon-Type monster. When this card is successfully Fusion Summoned, Special Summon 2 Level 3 or lower Dragon-Type monsters from your deck. A monster Special Summoned by this effect cannot attack this turn. As long as this card remains face-up on the field Dragon-Type monsters other than this card cannot be a targeted by card effects.[/align]

[The-Wick!]

only one question. HOW DA HELL THEY CAN BE RED EYES IF THEY DON'T EVEN HHAAVVEE RED EYES?!?!?!?

 

6.7/10

[chrid97]

only one question. HOW DA HELL THEY CAN BE RED EYES IF THEY DON'T EVEN HHAAVVEE RED EYES?!?!?!?

 

6.7/10

Could you atleast post something that would help not sheet. And tell me why did you give me a 6.7?

[The-Wick!]

Images are overused, some OCG errors, effects for the fusion monster are OP'ed, pictures doesn't correspond to the name. Fine for you?

[chrid97]

Tell me;

1) How the effects are OP'ed

2) What OCG errors

3) Were have you seen these pics

[Guest Zeonark]

only one question. HOW DA HELL THEY CAN BE RED EYES IF THEY DON'T EVEN HHAAVVEE RED EYES?!?!?!?

 

6.7/10

 

No one cares.

 

The first card has "send 2 cards". Add "to the Graveyard" so it can make sense. Anyway, It's a slow moving REBC but it does summon him from anywhere so I guess that's good.

 

I'm a bit iffy on the second card. I don't know if it affects itself or not with it's last effect. I'd add "all other Dragon-Type monsters cannot be targeted by card effects" just to clear it up.

 

Pretty... err... Decent.

[chrid97]

Thanks. Finally a decent rate.

[The-Wick!]

fusion monster are pretty easy to summon if they don't have a "Special Summon conditions". There are lots of good level 3 dragon monster (DON'T ASK WHAT MONSTERS), and dragon types are not affected by effects is too great, since this card is also treated as and Dragon-Type and when it's destroyed you can simply revive him with a trap or spell card next turn, making it difficult to destroy and too much easy to summon. OCG errors i'm not up to correct, ask raq for that, and this pictures are from jazin kay, and they DEFINATLY don't have Red-Eyes, making it pretty strange suiting the name.

[jayjack]

Lawl, sorta like skilled dark magician for Red-eyes

Fusion monster is good effect, though pictures arent all that good

8/10 (Ocg)

[chrid97]

fusion monster are pretty easy to summon if they don't have a "Special Summon conditions". There are lots of good level 3 dragon monster (DON'T ASK WHAT MONSTERS)' date=' and dragon types are not affected by effects is too great, since this card is also treated as and Dragon-Type and when it's destroyed you can simply revive him with a trap or spell card next turn, making it difficult to destroy and too much easy to summon. OCG errors i'm not up to correct, ask raq for that, and this pictures are from jazin kay, and they DEFINATLY don't have Red-Eyes, making it pretty strange suiting the name.

[/quote']

 

WTF they don't need red eyes. You now what don't ever post in my threads unless you have something smart/good helpful to say.

[jayjack]

The Wick has spoken.

[Guest Zeonark]

fusion monster are pretty easy to summon if they don't have a "Special Summon conditions". There are lots of good level 3 dragon monster (DON'T ASK WHAT MONSTERS)' date=' and dragon types are not affected by effects is too great, since this card is also treated as and Dragon-Type and when it's destroyed you can simply revive him with a trap or spell card next turn, making it difficult to destroy and too much easy to summon. OCG errors i'm not up to correct, ask raq for that, and this pictures are from jazin kay, and they DEFINATLY don't have Red-Eyes, making it pretty strange suiting the name.

[/quote']

 

WTF they don't need red eyes. You now what don't ever post in my threads unless you have something smart/good helpful to say.

 

He did have something smart/helpful to say.(Even though he spelled "Definitely" wrong.). He explained how the Fusion is OP'd. Just tone it down a bit.

I fail to see why he cares so much about them having Red Eyes though.

And for OCG Fixes:

 

This card is also treated as a Fiend-Type monster. Each time this card destroys a monster by battle' date=' add 1 "Red Eyes Counter" to this card. (Max. 4) When this card has 4 counters, you can remove them and send 2 cards from you hand to the Graveyard to Special Summon 1 "Red Eyes Black Dragon" from your hand, Deck, or Graveyard.[/quote']

 

I changed the Max. From the fact that he can only have three, how is his 4 counter effect suppose to work? xD

 

This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type and Dragon-Type monster. When this card is succesfully Fusion Summoned' date=' Special Summon 2 Level 3 or lower Dragon-Type monsters from your Deck. The monsters Special Summoned by this cards effect cannot attack the turn they are Summoned. As long as this card remains face-up on the field Dragon-Type monsters cannot be a targeted by card effects.[/quote']

 

Not sure if that's completely right.

[chrid97]

Yeah I put 3 instead of 4 by accident xD

And I know he said something helpful I'm just saying that so he doesnt do this again

Below

only one question. HOW DA HELL THEY CAN BE RED EYES IF THEY DON'T EVEN HHAAVVEE RED EYES?!?!?!?

 

6.7/10

[The-Wick!]

i know, about bother in red eyes, it's because red-eyes is a real yu-gi-oh "arch-type" and i didn't have seen any of then that don't have red-eyes since the name already says RED-EYES, if you count in first season, there was only red-eyes black dragon, so if he had green eyes it would be strange.

[chrid97]

We'll I could change the eye color to red.

And the first one doesnt need it because you can't see its eyes

[Darj]

OCG fix:

 

Royal Knight:

This card is also treated as a Fiend-Type monster. Each time this card destroys a opponent's monster by battle, place 1 Red-Eyes Counter on it. (Max. 3). You can remove 4 Red-Eyes Counters from this card and send 2 cards from your hand to the Graveyard to Special Summon 1 "Red-Eyes B. Dragon" from your hand, Deck, or Graveyard.

 

Black Knight:

Red Eyes Black Dragon + Red Eyes' Royal Knight

This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type and Dragon-Type monster. When this card is successfully Fusion Summoned, Special Summon 2 Level 3 or lower Dragon-Type monsters (from where?). A monster Special Summoned by this effect cannot attack this turn.As long as this card remains face-up on the field (this phrase has been discontinued by Konami) Dragon-Type monsters cannot be a targeted by card effects.

 

Just 2 questions:

-Why people insist in giving multiple types to a monster? Most of the Time is just a waste of space, and I bet they do it because the creature in the image resemble many kinds of monsters, not because of strategy or support.

 

-How can you collect 4 Red-Eyes counters if the Knight can only hold a maximum of 3?

 

Also, the "Warrior" word in the name of the Fusion is unnecessary, in my opinion; "Red-Eyes Black Knight" sounds better.

[The-Wick!]

yes, you're right at that =P

[chrid97]

OCG fix:

 

Royal Knight:

This card is also treated as a Fiend-Type monster. Each time this card destroys a opponent's monster by battle' date=' place 1 Red-Eyes Counter on it. (Max. 3). You can remove 4 Red-Eyes Counters from this card and send 2 cards from your hand to the Graveyard to Special Summon 1 "Red-Eyes B. Dragon" from your hand, Deck, or Graveyard.

 

Black Knight:

Red Eyes Black Dragon + Red Eyes' Royal Knight

This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type and Dragon-Type monster. When this card is successfully Fusion Summoned, Special Summon 2 Level 3 or lower Dragon-Type monsters [b'](from where?)[/b]. A monster Special Summoned by this effect cannot attack this turn.As long as this card remains face-up on the field (this phrase has been discontinued by Konami) Dragon-Type monsters cannot be a targeted by card effects. Oops I forgot

 

Just 2 questions:

-Why people insist in giving multiple types to a monster? Most of the Time is just a waste of space, and I bet they do it because the creature in the image resemble many kinds of monsters, not because of strategy or support.

IDK

-How can you collect 4 Red-Eyes counters if the Knight can only hold a maximum of 3?

Typo, I put 3 instead of 4

Also, the "Warrior" word in the name of the Fusion is unnecessary, in my opinion; "Red-Eyes Black Knight" sounds better.

[Darj]

Oh, sorry; I didn't see Zeonark had already provided OCG fix for you.

[chrid97]

No its fine, 2 is better than 1

[ragnarok1945]

for Royal Knight, I'd almost never use the counter removal effect because there's no more use of Red Eyes Black Dragon anymore except for the fusion

 

as for the fusion, not being able to be targeted by ALL card effects makes it a bit OPed

 

I'd just limit it to monster effects and spells

 

8.3/10

[chrid97]

I think monster effects and traps instead. And doesn't it say "to all other dragon type monsters except this card" or something?

[Keyu_Sensei420]

Whats with the words :P im not dissing them or anything lol it just looks like the text on fake cards

[chrid97]

I use MSE. Look at my sig were it says MSE.