1 New Card <3

[Jazin Kay]

[MibeR]

EMH..

 

WHY the monster isn't?? a union.. if the effect like that..

 

but i like the pics...8/10

[Jazin Kay]

I figured there could be a hotly abused Union support combo that could break the card. Or something.

 

That, and the full text for a standard Union Monster is far too large, the card maker shrinks it. So I stuck with the text of Armory Arm.

[.Leo]

Unoriginal. Just the "attack twice during the same battle phase."

 

This is a Union monster you are trying to make, so make it a Union monster mkay?

 

Also, due to it's level, it is underpowered. If it was Level 4 then it might be ok.

 

-6/10-

 

BTW, when I saw the <3 in the title, I was expecting a very interesting a creative card. I was unimpressed.

[Jazin Kay]

Unoriginal. Just the "attack twice during the same battle phase."

No actual card grants this effect to another monster. Originality' date=' technically.[/b']

 

This is a Union monster you are trying to make, so make it a Union monster mkay?

No. I don't have to. Armory Arm isn't a Union, so neither is this. It's perfectly fine being an effect monster.

 

Also, due to it's level, it is underpowered. If it was Level 4 then it might be ok.

If it's too easily summoned, it could be overpowered. OTK combos, and such. Giant Rat and Chaos-End Master summoning this is speedy enough.

 

-6/10-

 

BTW, when I saw the <3 in the title, I was expecting a very interesting a creative card. I was unimpressed.

 

Well that's like, your opinion, man.

[Sander]

Unoriginal. Just the "attack twice during the same battle phase."

 

So? It's still a decent card. It doesn't have to be original to be good.

 

BTW' date=' when I saw the <3 in the title, I was expecting a very interesting a creative card. I was unimpressed.[/quote']

 

You expect too much.

 

ON TOPIC: The card is decent, but I have to agree with Leo that Level 4 would be good for this card.

[Lord Smeagle]

Unions, as a rule, suck. They NEED a hotly abused combo like this. Make it a Union, maybe we'll see something competitive.

[Jazin Kay]

Well, now that Union fans are begging, I'm more inclined to leave it as is.

 

I already gave my reasons for not making it a Union, one of which is entirely unrelated to gameplay and falls more under my own design preference. You're just gonna have to put up with it.

[Sander]

I already gave my reasons for not making it a Union' date=' one of which is entirely unrelated to gameplay and falls more under my own design preference. You're just gonna have to put up with it.

[/quote']

 

Do you honestly believe that these members actually read your posts? Well, some do, but there's only like, a handful of them. The others just comment on your card, and don't bother reading the other posts in the thread.

[.Leo]

Unoriginal. Just the "attack twice during the same battle phase."

No actual card grants this effect to another monster. Originality' date=' technically.[/b']

Meh, it has been done before.

 

This is a Union monster you are trying to make, so make it a Union monster mkay?

No. I don't have to. Armory Arm isn't a Union, so neither is this. It's perfectly fine being an effect monster.

Meh, but it gets past the 1 Union monster effect

 

Also, due to it's level, it is underpowered. If it was Level 4 then it might be ok.

If it's too easily summoned, it could be overpowered. OTK combos, and such. Giant Rat and Chaos-End Master summoning this is speedy enough.

But I can Foolish -> Call of the Haunted?

 

-6/10-

 

BTW, when I saw the <3 in the title, I was expecting a very interesting a creative card. I was unimpressed.

 

Well that's like, your opinion, man.

Yeah.

 

Unoriginal. Just the "attack twice during the same battle phase."

 

So? It's still a decent card. It doesn't have to be original to be good.

I agree it is decent' date=' but he could have put a little more effort in.[/i']

 

BTW' date=' when I saw the <3 in the title, I was expecting a very interesting a creative card. I was unimpressed.[/quote']

 

You expect too much.

Yeah :/. Something I am not proud of.

 

ON TOPIC: The card is decent, but I have to agree with Leo that Level 4 would be good for this card.

[Jazin Kay]

I put plenty of effort into it. Leo just expects too much. Not that there's anything actually wrong with that, I do too, at times. I expect to walk at LEAST 5 steps before seeing a Zubat in Mt Moon, but is that gonna happen? Hohoho, goodness no.

 

There's no argument here. The card is how I made it. There's no argument with Foolish Burial + Call of the Haunted, that's a terribly easy argument that I could use against an idiot to say Blue-Eyes White Dragon is broken. You'll have to do better than that, kid.

[ragnarok1945]

picture doesn't look TOO insect like to me, but whatever

 

now, as for the effect, it's fine for attacking twice, don't know why you didn't make this a union monster though

 

8.5/10

[Sander]

don't know why you didn't make this a union monster though

 

He already explained why he didn't make it a Union Monster, sheesh.