Tronta Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 1 neo-daed3 daed2 codarus2 skreech2 warrior of atlantis3 aqua spirit2 fishborg2 poc2 grizzly19 2 salvage3 alo2 psuedo space1 terra1 trunade1 brain control3 moray of greed1 card dest2 big small1 poa2 water hazard19 2 aegis2 deck 40 so this is an old build, but i wanna hear ycm's thoughts on it. talk to me ycm, what should i do with this? rate/fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 - 2 Abyssal sheet+ 2 Screech- Terra+ W of Atlantis-2 Pseudo Space+2 Forgotten Underwater Temple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 -2 Big small-1 ocean d-lord+1 grizzly+1 salvage as grizzly gets Codarus and Salvage well Salvages both Codarus and Grizzly and is a +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 -2 Big small-1 ocean d-lord+1 grizzly+1 salvage as grizzly gets Codarus and Salvage well Salvages both Codarus and Grizzly and is a +1 Third Salvage is Overkill and leads to death drawsAlso you negged 3 cards and added 2 where the deck has 40 cardsI'd actually neg the Ocean Lord and the 2 BWSW for a Grizly and a couple Bottomless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted March 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 explain a few of these to me. psuedospace for underwater: underwater is slow as sheet. isnt psuedo superior simply for speed? you cant play it first turn, but with 2 warriors and 3 alos it shouldnt be hard. on that note, one terraforming is somewhat beneficial over another warrior, because it can search psuedospace as well. skreech is cool, i'll make that change. i guess it has greater consistency than the shark, whose only use is pumping my post-nuke damage by 1700. not a bad effect, mind you, but it does require extra summons. why does no one like big small? its such a good card. the -to the hand is painful, true, but that only becomes really painful in the big plays. sure, a -3 minimum from the hand is painful to get out daed, but daed himself can nuke the field for potential +'s. in terms of card advantage, a normal summon into bigsmall into daed into daed's effect is a -3, but a -3 for a field nuke isnt bad, when it translates to 2600 damage and some +'s from hitting your opponents cards. am i really that wrong on this one? and no neo daed? but he's so cool >.< and with poc, he's even viable. so what am i changing..kingsharks for skreeches... then find room for another grizzly?and bottomlesses apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 i just find big small to be too inconsistent and often leads to being a dead draw.....Neo-Daed is fine but all you really need is Daedalus and Codarus......Neo is just a filler really... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted March 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 i would need to play test it to determine it's consistency, i suppose. as well as it's dead drawy nature. and neo daed is fun. theoretically. if, whilst playing, i determine that he isnt, i will remove him. assuming those 3 go, what do i replace them with?+1 grizzly, +2 bth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 explain a few of these to me. psuedospace for underwater: underwater is slow as s***. isnt psuedo superior simply for speed? you cant play it first turn' date=' but with 2 warriors and 3 alos it shouldnt be hard. on that note, one terraforming is somewhat beneficial over another warrior, because it can search psuedospace as well.[/quote'] For what Im playing I actually found FUT's side effect to be really useful, I can evade stuffs like Bottomless, TT, Spining Bouncing and even removing to strategical and needed monsters from lower levels Mainly codalus, and even when is slow in its job as a Dae bullet is more consistent than Pseudo Space coz it doesnt fall victim to DDCrow's sheananigans when FUT's only deal is mst. why does no one like big small? its such a good card. the -to the hand is painful' date=' true, but that only becomes really painful in the big plays. sure, a -3 minimum from the hand is painful to get out daed, but daed himself can nuke the field for potential +'s. in terms of card advantage, a normal summon into bigsmall into daed into daed's effect is a -3, but a -3 for a field nuke isnt bad, when it translates to 2600 damage and some +'s from hitting your opponents cards. am i really that wrong on this one?[/quote'] No actually but there are just better cards to use....Some thing that this kind of decks lack more than speed and quick ways of bringing Dae onto the field is the consistancy of reach the point where everything is setup and the nuke is done...somewhere on your pull out of the combo can fail and all the effort goes into nothing so having the less sitautional tool getting away the deck and living their space to tools that help us ensure the combo will not be disrupted shall be your priority, other than that is a matter of tastes really. and no neo daed? but he's so cool >.< and with poc' date=' he's even viable.[/quote'] I might say this card is exceptional it is just....be run in 1 and lacking some cards that MAX out its functionality just mess up he needs some dedication put towards him...not only be teched just because... On a side note...I like the build as is obvios coz is a daedalus deck...I gave you some tips now i'd like to see what the test say you about the functionability of the deck and if you need more help just ask me I'll be glad to help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted March 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 hrm... what cards could max out the functionality of neo-daed? a wyvern system? or infernities? i didnt realize fut's other effect could do that.. derp. i forgot it had another effect. and yeah.. ddcrow.. lets see, if i made all said changes, i would be..-1 neo daed, -2 psuedo, -1 terra, -2 bigsmall+1 grizzly, +2 fut, +1 warrior, +2 bth funny how that works out.i'll test it out, i suppose. eventually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 FUT? explain please. it should be a more balanced now and you wont have too many dead hands im guessing....... its a shame Levia wasnt an 8star.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 FUT? explain please. it should be a more balanced now and you wont have too many dead hands im guessing....... its a shame Levia wasnt an 8star.... Forgotten Underwater Temple @Tronta: a MAX out effiecnt NEO-DAE Deck....shall run stuff like Trade-in, Plaguespreader, D-Hero Dasher.....like a Norlera deck... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted March 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 then why not run a noreleras deck.are there any more water specific cards that could be run in a sexy neo daed deck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.