Kyosuke Kiryu Posted March 21, 2010 Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 If Konami isn't going to ban this, it should be at 3. [/iMO] Discuss this cards position on the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted March 21, 2010 Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 0 or 3. It's not disadvantaged by only having 1.2 Goyos can steal 2 monsters in the same turn.But 2 Brionacs is pointless.Should be at 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted March 21, 2010 Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 0 or 3. It's not disadvantaged by only having 1.2 Goyos can steal 2 monsters in the same turn.But 2 Brionacs is pointless.Should be at 0. There IS a disadvantage to only having 1. It's the same disadvantage that Rose has at 1. You can only Synchro Summon it once per duel. Unless you use CotH or some other method of revival that can bring back Synchros, then after 1 use it's gone. This is something that so many of you tend to overlook as nothing, but it actually has an impact on longer games. Not saying anything about its list position, but seriously people. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted March 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 0 or 3. It's not disadvantaged by only having 1.2 Goyos can steal 2 monsters in the same turn.But 2 Brionacs is pointless.Should be at 0. There IS a disadvantage to only having 1. It's the same disadvantage that Rose has at 1. You can only Synchro Summon it once per duel. Unless you use CotH or some other method of revival that can bring back Synchros' date=' then after 1 use it's gone. This is something that so many of you tend to overlook as nothing, but it actually has an impact on longer games. Not saying anything about its list position, but seriously people. :/[/quote'] Yeah, I heard OTKing once per duel isn't as good as doing it twice or thrice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted March 21, 2010 Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 0 or 3. It's not disadvantaged by only having 1.2 Goyos can steal 2 monsters in the same turn.But 2 Brionacs is pointless.Should be at 0. There IS a disadvantage to only having 1. It's the same disadvantage that Rose has at 1. You can only Synchro Summon it once per duel. Unless you use CotH or some other method of revival that can bring back Synchros' date=' then after 1 use it's gone. This is something that so many of you tend to overlook as nothing, but it actually has an impact on longer games. Not saying anything about its list position, but seriously people. :/[/quote'] Yeah, I heard OTKing once per duel isn't as good as doing it twice or thrice. I was attacking the logic of limiting things like this in general. Just throwing one line like that to a much longer post makes you sound stupid. Regardless, something I should note is that this doesn't actually cause the OTKs. Other cards do, and those are more banworthy than this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted March 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 0 or 3. It's not disadvantaged by only having 1.2 Goyos can steal 2 monsters in the same turn.But 2 Brionacs is pointless.Should be at 0. There IS a disadvantage to only having 1. It's the same disadvantage that Rose has at 1. You can only Synchro Summon it once per duel. Unless you use CotH or some other method of revival that can bring back Synchros' date=' then after 1 use it's gone. This is something that so many of you tend to overlook as nothing, but it actually has an impact on longer games. Not saying anything about its list position, but seriously people. :/[/quote'] Yeah, I heard OTKing once per duel isn't as good as doing it twice or thrice. I was attacking the logic of limiting things like this in general. Just throwing one line like that to a much longer post makes you sound stupid. Regardless, something I should note is that this doesn't actually cause the OTKs. Other cards do, and those are more banworthy than this. I know it doesn't cause OTKs which is why in my OP I say it should be at 3 if Konami won't ban it. This still needs to be banned though, limiting doesn't hurt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 Although there are many who disagree, I believe this card should be banned. It eliminates any possible threat and allows the owner to proceed to win with little effort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 I don't see why everyone hates this card so much (gets shot)Deserves to be banned, too easy to summon for such an awesome effect. Same with JD and DAD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 belongs at 1. and does anyone else think this looks like Hyonimaru? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 belongs at 1. and does anyone else think this looks like Hyonimaru? Dot Dot DotIt's a snowflake with 6 sides, not 4 like Hyonimaru's bankai star thing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 It should be made a LV 9 with 2500 ATK to be balanced. For now, I request a ban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 Yeah' date=' I heard OTKing once per duel isn't as good as doing it twice or thrice.[/quote'] If I bottomless your brionac you can't summon another one and OTK. Monster Removal existing gives a point to limiting synchros and fusions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hyperion Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 Yeah' date=' I heard OTKing once per duel isn't as good as doing it twice or thrice.[/quote'] If I bottomless your brionac you can't summon another one and OTK. Priority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 I big deal with it at one :/. We have Heavy Storm. No cost, complete backrow removal.We have MST. Like Brionac's effect, except the card is destroyed and there is no cost.We have Fissure and Smashing Ground. Destroy a face up monster (Card choses selection).We have Lightning Vortex. Discard a card to destroy all face up monsters your opponent controls.We have Mist Wurm. Return 3 cards for free.We have Black Rose Dragon. Field nuke.We have Torrential Tribute. After summon, destroy all cards.We have Penguin Solider. Return 2 cards after FLIP. BoM + BoT anyone? This is a 3 or 0 card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 Yeah' date=' I heard OTKing once per duel isn't as good as doing it twice or thrice.[/quote'] If I bottomless your brionac you can't summon another one and OTK. Priority. Goblin Zombie says no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daboss144 Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 Should be banned. Having it at 1 does help, but the OTKs are still too easy with this. Although many of them will end up resorting to mist wurm... Won't be banned, but should be... Player 1: Sweet! I have facedown Starlight road and Heraklinos on the Field!!! I'm in pretty good shape! Player 2: I summon brionac! Player 1: FUUUUUU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 Should be banned. Having it at 1 does help' date=' but the OTKs are still too easy with this. Although many of them will end up resorting to mist wurm... Won't be banned, but should be... Player 1: Sweet! I have facedown Starlight road, facedown Bottomless Trap Hole and Heraklinos on the Field!!! I'm in pretty good shape! Player 2: I summon brionac! Player 1: Bottomless Trap Hole. Player 2: FFFFFUUUUUUUUUU[/quote'] That would be the smart thing to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.