Next...

[FtQuan]

[psychicplayer]

most of the time divine monsters are OPed this doesn't fit the bill. Its also Divine-Beast type. Honestly what good does it do you on the field?

 

5/10

[StevenBray]

I think the OCG is wrong, but I don't know how its wrong - it's weird it just feels wrong when I read it (OCG wise). Pic is nice, effect is interesting, balanced but maybe not so useful since Ritual Monsters aren't that useful in the real world. Now, "Divine" is not a Type, use "Dragon" or something.

 

Rating: 7/10 - I feel the OCG is wrong, but since I don't know how I can't penalize you for it plus a -1 for the use of Divine. Interesting and nice way to try and help Ritual Monsters, but I don't think its useful enough to make a big enough difference.

[flyingtoastr]

The effect of this card is taken word for word from Djinn Disserere of Rituals, so the OCG is technically correct. Not sure what you would use this card for though, given that a real card exists with the same effect.

[ragnarok1945]

this is nowhere NEAR OPed like a DIVINE monster should be

 

this is useless to you on the field, so I'm only giving this 5/10

[-Griffin]

this is nowhere NEAR OPed like a DIVINE monster should be

 

this is useless to you on the field' date=' so I'm only giving this 5/10

[/quote']

 

Sorry, but let me address this post:

#1 No card, regardless of name/type/attribute/ect should be OP'd.

#2 The two real divine monsters are pretty weak, UP'd or balanced depending on how you rate. I say UP'd because of pesty conditions.

#3 Cards don't have to be useful on the field at all. Gardna, Vayu, Bushi, Shining C, Treeborn, Level Eater, Dandylion, ect all work mostly from off-field, but they're perfectly good cards.

#4 This is a type/attribute change of a real card, so clearly effects like this are acceptable to at least Konami =p