ssoommee Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 1 Tuner + 2 non-Tuner MonstersThis card can only be Special Summoned in DEF position. Neither Player takes battle damage from battles involving this card. This card cannot be switched to ATK position. When this card is removed from the field, it is removed from play instead. This card cannot be brought back into play if it was removed from play. This card is not effected by any card, except for God card. This card's effects cannot be negated. This card cannot be destroyed by the effect of a card. You can tribute any number of monsters on your side of the field to increase this card's ATK and DEF equal to the ATK and DEF of the tributed monster. You can decrease your Life Points to increase this card's attack by the decreased amount. You can treat this card as a Tuner monster only during your turn. This card cannot be used in a Synchro Summon, Except for the Synchro Summon of "The Winged Dragon of Ra: Pheonix Mode". You can pay 1000 Life Points to destroy 1 monster card on the field. Pay 1000 Life Points during each of you End Phases, or destroy this card. When this card is destroyed, special summon 1 "The Winged Dragon of Ra: Dragon Mode" from your Graveyard in face up ATK position. 1 "The Winged Dragon of Ra: Sphere Mode" on the field is treated as a Tuner Monster, until the End Phase, and you can Synchro Summon with that monster, until the End Phase. This card's effects cannot be negated.Winged Dragon of Ra Set Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadow wind Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 4-6/10and the second to the last card, does not have "1 Tuner + 2 non-Tuner Monsters" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTR~ Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 when did the sphere have infinite ATK?? because of that i give you a 8.4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yang Xiao-Long Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 Umm...this is like a fail for Ra, since it was never made to be a Synchro...and since when is an ATK Inf.? PLEASE get a better pic if you're gonna do Ra: Phoenix Mode. Does this even belong in Realistic?4/10Could do better. Keep trying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikatsui Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 This. Is. Fail.1/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T3RA PROWL3R Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 Props, haven't seen a WDoR Set done before. Now, I am going to defy the means of these other members and post a long-ass essay about what is and isn't wrong about these cards. First off, you shouldn't make a Divine Synchro. Well, atleast not Ra. Second, don't use colins (These things ::::). Use hyphens (These things ----) instead. Third, the OCG is off. Normally, I would try to fix it, but my computer is acting up. Lul, I lied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 why give the sphere infinite atk? That's OPed for a synchro personally I'm unsure if this is a good modification for the god cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｎｏ.３９ 希望皇ホープ Posted March 29, 2010 Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 Epic fail, Find better pics for phoenix mode and sphere mode. The sphere's ATK and DEF are technically irrelevant because the sphere's true (anime/manga) effect is that it can not attack or be attacked, it is basically a wasted monster card zone until you convert it to dragon mode. And Dragon mode's original ATK and DEF is equal to the total ATK and DEF of monsters tributed to summon it (which you neglected to mention). While in Dragon mode, sacrificing all of your life points, except for 1 (not any amount, like you effect implies you can) and all monsters transfers the amount of life points paid and the combined ATK of the tributed monsters to Ra's ATK, activating Pheonix Mode. Phoenix Mode's only effect was to tranfer all of its ATK (including what it gained from tributed monsters) back to your life points. Decent Effort... 2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resol999 Posted March 29, 2010 Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 2.5/10 You're trying, and you didn't get a 1 or 0 just because you're a new member. A few pics are very blurry. Divine-Beast don't belong in Realistic Card section. They aren't even allowed in a deck. Most things wrong have already been pointed out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyenn Posted March 29, 2010 Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 Actually I am quite certain that Phoenix Mode had an ability to destroy all monster on opponent's side of the field and the do some LP damage in someway, yugioh.wikia is vouching for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kato_Zenamara Posted March 29, 2010 Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 My Rating: 10/YouSuck I cannot being to describe the utter hatred and fail I feel at these. They are just about an insult to the card game.Its clear you don't know HOW to synchro summon, or even play this game at all. However, despite how sick I feel just by looking at these, I must commend you on the OCG. Its actually quite good, aside from the obvious fail factor, and a few missing things (including the synchro materials for a synchro monster). For a n00b, the OCG is definately extraordinaire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted March 30, 2010 Report Share Posted March 30, 2010 Divine-Beast don't belong in Realistic Card section. They aren't even allowed in a deck.Divine-Beast is an official Type. Why wouldn't it belong here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resol999 Posted March 30, 2010 Report Share Posted March 30, 2010 Divine-Beast don't belong in Realistic Card section. They aren't even allowed in a deck.Divine-Beast is an official Type. Why wouldn't it belong here? Everytime I'd post Divine-Beasts in this card section, I'd get 400 million people telling me it doesn't belong here and the thread gets locked. I'm just saying what I've been told. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted March 30, 2010 Report Share Posted March 30, 2010 Divine-Beast don't belong in Realistic Card section. They aren't even allowed in a deck.Divine-Beast is an official Type. Why wouldn't it belong here? Everytime I'd post Divine-Beasts in this card section' date=' I'd get 400 million people telling me it doesn't belong here and the thread gets locked. I'm just saying what I've been told.[/quote'] Doesn't matter what they say. It's an official Type now, so it has a right to be in this section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resol999 Posted March 30, 2010 Report Share Posted March 30, 2010 Divine-Beast don't belong in Realistic Card section. They aren't even allowed in a deck.Divine-Beast is an official Type. Why wouldn't it belong here? Everytime I'd post Divine-Beasts in this card section' date=' I'd get 400 million people telling me it doesn't belong here and the thread gets locked. I'm just saying what I've been told.[/quote'] Doesn't matter what they say. It's an official Type now, so it has a right to be in this section. Thank you for telling me this I'll keep that in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jawsisra Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 were did you find your Tablet Ra Pic from the one I been useing is Blury and I like yours its clear to see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kato_Zenamara Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Divine-Beast is a type now, yes, because there are TWO cards with it: Both legalized god cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arcfigter Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 as the spell card a joke? are you 5? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.