Jump to content

An Empowered Jirai Gumo

LourDeath

By LourDeath
in Realistic Cards

Recommended Posts

LourDeath Newbie

LourDeath

Posted
Posted

[align=center]PLEASE READ MY EXPLANATION FIRST

 

ladyjiraigumo.jpg

 

When you declare an attack with this card, toss a coin and call it. If you call it right, attack normally. If you call it wrong, roll a dice and declare a number. If you call it right, lose half of your Life Points and attack your opponent directly. If the number you declare is wrong, this card cannot attack this turn.

 

 

 

JiraiGumoMRD-NA-C-UE.jpg

 

I based the effects on jirai gumo

 

but since it is an empowered jirai gumo, I added an effect.

Like Jirai Gumos effect which has a kickback on the controller of the card...

ABOUT THE ATTACK

I raised the attack to 3200 like jirai gumo...

 

which has 2200 for a Level 4 card...

 

it is only balanced because of the drawback effect....

 

THANKS!!![/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LourDeath Newbie

LourDeath

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I thought it was supposed to be ROLL a die

 

furthermore 3200 atk is WAY too much for lv6' date=' drop it down to 2400 instead

 

seems for the die roll it's better to call it wrong anyway, I'm unsure what to make of this

 

7/10

[/quote']

 

 

 

tsk tsk!!! ragna i told you

 

it's even typed in "BOLD" there sir... why my attack is like that... tsk...

POOR RAGNAROK

 

doesn't know how to read the thread first before commenting...

 

tsk! tsk!

 

 

where's your manners??? XD

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CrabHelmet Newbie

CrabHelmet

Posted
Posted

furthermore 3200 atk is WAY too much for lv6' date=' drop it down to 2400 instead

[/quote']

 

Now, Ragnarok, I'm sure one of your vast post count experience couldn't possibly seriously believe that a 2400 is a good ATK for a Level 6 monster with a strictly negative effect, considering that it is also the ATK of some of the Level 6 monsters with the strongest effects, like the Monarchs and Jinzo, and is even low for a Vanilla Level 6, which can be as high as 2600. Nor, Ragnarok, could you possibly believe that it is unreasonable for a monster with a negative effect so crippling to receive extra ATK in compensation, as is the case with pretty much all negative-effect monsters - including, you know the Jirai Gumo on which this topic is based, which you could not possibly have forgotten. Therefore, Ragnarok, I can only conclude that you were deliberately trolling and trying to sabotage this card, so I have an excuse unavoidable duty to give you a ban for trolling, which is against site regulations. Goodbye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LourDeath Newbie

LourDeath

Posted
  • Author
Posted

furthermore 3200 atk is WAY too much for lv6' date=' drop it down to 2400 instead

[/quote']

 

Now, Ragnarok, I'm sure one of your vast post count experience couldn't possibly seriously believe that a 2400 is a good ATK for a Level 6 monster with a strictly negative effect, considering that it is also the ATK of some of the Level 6 monsters with the strongest effects, like the Monarchs and Jinzo, and is even low for a Vanilla Level 6, which can be as high as 2600. Nor, Ragnarok, could you possibly believe that it is unreasonable for a monster with a negative effect so crippling to receive extra ATK in compensation, as is the case with pretty much all negative-effect monsters - including, you know the Jirai Gumo on which this topic is based, which you could not possibly have forgotten. Therefore, Ragnarok, I can only conclude that you were deliberately trolling and trying to sabotage this card, so I have an excuse unavoidable duty to give you a ban for trolling, which is against site regulations. Goodbye.

 

now that's what you called FAIR DELIBERATION

 

a +rep 4 u sir...

 

thanks......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LourDeath Newbie

LourDeath

Posted
  • Author
Posted

This card is actually not bad at all. Pic is...interesting. Might slap a PG-13 warning on that' date=' but the card is just fine. Shame she's not still an Insect, I'd run this in Spiders...9.4/10.

[/quote']

 

 

 

yah... thanks for that sir...

 

also i wanna know if i still have to edit that body part...

 

 

i tried a male jirai gumo but it really makes me vomit... XD

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darj Community Regular

Darj

Posted
Posted

I think you should give a fixed result for the dice (similar to "Snipe Hunter"), because guessing the right number is something almost impossible to do as it depends of 2 variables: your choice, and the dice result.

 

It's a good card that is balanced on its own, but powerful, if not OP'ed, if you run "Skill Drain".

 

Why it is a Fiend-Type? If it's based on Jirai-Gumo, shouldn't it be Insect-Type as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LourDeath Newbie

LourDeath

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think you should give a fixed result for the dice (similar to "Snipe Hunter")' date=' because guessing the right number is something almost impossible to do as it depends of 2 variables: your choice, and the dice result.

 

It's a good card that is balanced on its own, but powerful, if not OP'ed, if you run "Skill Drain".

 

Why it is a Fiend-Type? If it's based on Jirai-Gumo, shouldn't it be Insect-Type as well?

[/quote']

 

i made it guess a number because of this cards ATK of 3200

when u guess right it's a "DIRECT DAMAGE"

 

that would inbalance it sir....

 

and i'm thinking of the approiate type really

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gogeta™ Newbie

Gogeta™

Posted
Posted

furthermore 3200 atk is WAY too much for lv6' date=' drop it down to 2400 instead

[/quote']

 

Now, Ragnarok, I'm sure one of your vast post count experience couldn't possibly seriously believe that a 2400 is a good ATK for a Level 6 monster with a strictly negative effect, considering that it is also the ATK of some of the Level 6 monsters with the strongest effects, like the Monarchs and Jinzo, and is even low for a Vanilla Level 6, which can be as high as 2600. Nor, Ragnarok, could you possibly believe that it is unreasonable for a monster with a negative effect so crippling to receive extra ATK in compensation, as is the case with pretty much all negative-effect monsters - including, you know the Jirai Gumo on which this topic is based, which you could not possibly have forgotten. Therefore, Ragnarok, I can only conclude that you were deliberately trolling and trying to sabotage this card, so I have an excuse unavoidable duty to give you a ban for trolling, which is against site regulations. Goodbye.

 

Maybe that was a bit unnecessary?

 

... I think 3200 ATK is fair since the effect can really burn you and the fact that its also a chance card furthers the reason why this card should have 3200 ATK.

 

I like the idea of having a different version of Gumo. I'll give this card an 8/10 :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LourDeath Newbie

LourDeath

Posted
  • Author
Posted

furthermore 3200 atk is WAY too much for lv6' date=' drop it down to 2400 instead

[/quote']

 

Now, Ragnarok, I'm sure one of your vast post count experience couldn't possibly seriously believe that a 2400 is a good ATK for a Level 6 monster with a strictly negative effect, considering that it is also the ATK of some of the Level 6 monsters with the strongest effects, like the Monarchs and Jinzo, and is even low for a Vanilla Level 6, which can be as high as 2600. Nor, Ragnarok, could you possibly believe that it is unreasonable for a monster with a negative effect so crippling to receive extra ATK in compensation, as is the case with pretty much all negative-effect monsters - including, you know the Jirai Gumo on which this topic is based, which you could not possibly have forgotten. Therefore, Ragnarok, I can only conclude that you were deliberately trolling and trying to sabotage this card, so I have an excuse unavoidable duty to give you a ban for trolling, which is against site regulations. Goodbye.

 

Maybe that was a bit unnecessary?

 

... I think 3200 ATK is fair since the effect can really burn you and the fact that its also a chance card furthers the reason why this card should have 3200 ATK.

 

I like the idea of having a different version of Gumo. I'll give this card an 8/10 :)

 

sir thank you... you're so nice ^.^

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LourDeath Newbie

LourDeath

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ragna is pretty right' date=' with that high of a ATK make it a higher LV.

 

8.8

[/quote']

 

sir it's like jirai gumo....

 

 

why 2200 for a level 4....?

it's the same as 3200 for a level 6....

 

 

please think sir...

 

THINKING is really USEFUL at times ^.^

Ragna is pretty right' date=' with that high of a ATK make it a higher LV.

 

8.8

[/quote']

 

 

oh and try to read the whole thread sometimes...

 

 

if you know what i mean

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gogeta™ Newbie

Gogeta™

Posted
Posted

Ragna is pretty right' date=' with that high of a ATK make it a higher LV.

 

8.8

[/quote']

 

sir it's like jirai gumo....

 

 

why 2200 for a level 4....?

it's the same as 3200 for a level 6....

 

 

please think sir...

 

THINKING is really USEFUL at times ^.^

Ragna is pretty right' date=' with that high of a ATK make it a higher LV.

 

8.8

[/quote']

 

 

oh and try to read the whole thread sometimes...

 

 

if you know what i mean

 

Most people would assume this is OP'ed since its 3200 ATK but only Level 6. What they don't realize is that the effect balances out the whole card. However I might change this to Level 7 since 3200 ATK is still a tad much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lord Smeagle Newbie

Lord Smeagle

Posted
Posted

Really, it's a 1-in-6 chance to hit directly, so failing that, five times out of twelve this card won't get to attack at all. And that 1 in 12 chance is equivalent to paying for Solemn Judgement. I'm not quite seeing how this card is broken.

 

Heck, the Earthbound Immortals get to attack directly EVERY TURN. Even if you slapped a Megamorph on it, it doesn't equal OTK even 1-in-12 times, so what's the issue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CrabHelmet Newbie

CrabHelmet

Posted
Posted

What is wrong with all of you people? This is a one-Tribute monster with a horribly negative effect that makes its attacks not work properly half the time, and it still only has 600 more ATK than Frostasaurus, a one-Tribute Normal Monster. Forget about it being overpowered; I'm having trouble thinking of a deck in which this is actually good enough to use.

 

(The others who say it's overpowered don't get banned because they don't have ten million posts, so the benefit of the doubt goes to their inexperience.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LourDeath Newbie

LourDeath

Posted
  • Author
Posted

What is wrong with all of you people? This is a one-Tribute monster with a horribly negative effect that makes its attacks not work properly half the time' date=' and it still only has 600 more ATK than Frostasaurus, a one-Tribute Normal Monster. Forget about it being [i']over[/i]powered; I'm having trouble thinking of a deck in which this is actually good enough to use.

 

(The others who say it's overpowered don't get banned because they don't have ten million posts, so the benefit of the doubt goes to their inexperience.)

 

that's very well said sir....

 

Thanks ^.^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...