The most epic set of YCM! Unleash Negatrus! -beam, -realm, -darkness, and -phantasm added!

[Ghoulish]

ill give u one thing they are definately original whether it be in a good or bad ay its still original none the less. Pics r good ocgs fine. I dont think they would be overly effective thought. Could be very abusable though like with cards that special summon monsters from the deck with 1500 atk or less could easily summon a really poerful one of these. Mainly for thoriginality 9.8/10 =)

[Shaco]

ill give u one thing they are definately original whether it be in a good or bad ay its still original none the less. Pics r good ocgs fine. I dont think they would be overly effective thought. Could be very abusable though like with cards that special summon monsters from the deck with 1500 atk or less could easily summon a really poerful one of these. Mainly for thoriginality 9.8/10 =)

 

Since their ATK is actually ?, they can't be searched by any searches that have ATK as their searching method.

[Chaos Flame]

ill give u one thing they are definately original whether it be in a good or bad ay its still original none the less. Pics r good ocgs fine. I dont think they would be overly effective thought. Could be very abusable though like with cards that special summon monsters from the deck with 1500 atk or less could easily summon a really poerful one of these. Mainly for thoriginality 9.8/10 =)

 

Since their ATK is actually ?' date=' they can't be searched by any searches that have ATK as their searching method.

[/quote']

 

By thier effects, their atk is negative rgardless of where they are... I think. Negatrus Phi: Depths is their searcher and tau occulus and theta obleteration are thier main drawers.

[Shaco]

ill give u one thing they are definately original whether it be in a good or bad ay its still original none the less. Pics r good ocgs fine. I dont think they would be overly effective thought. Could be very abusable though like with cards that special summon monsters from the deck with 1500 atk or less could easily summon a really poerful one of these. Mainly for thoriginality 9.8/10 =)

 

Since their ATK is actually ?' date=' they can't be searched by any searches that have ATK as their searching method.

[/quote']

 

By thier effects, their atk is negative rgardless of where they are... I think. Negatrus Phi: Depths is their searcher and tau occulus and theta obleteration are thier main drawers.

 

Monsters with ? ATK only have their effects, which would determine their ATK, active while on the field, so their ATK is either treated as ? or 0 while in the deck, hand, or Graveyard, depending on the situation.

 

So, I'd suggest, again, that you put their negative ATK in parentheses so its ATK is always treated as such, no matter what circumstance.

 

... but, that would make it so its ATK couldn't be altered... maybe

 

(This card's Original ATK is always treated as -1800) or something along those lines.

 

Like Chimera (As I've cited, before)

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Chimera_the_Flying_Mythical_Beast

[Chaos Flame]

ill give u one thing they are definately original whether it be in a good or bad ay its still original none the less. Pics r good ocgs fine. I dont think they would be overly effective thought. Could be very abusable though like with cards that special summon monsters from the deck with 1500 atk or less could easily summon a really poerful one of these. Mainly for thoriginality 9.8/10 =)

 

Since their ATK is actually ?' date=' they can't be searched by any searches that have ATK as their searching method.

[/quote']

 

By thier effects, their atk is negative rgardless of where they are... I think. Negatrus Phi: Depths is their searcher and tau occulus and theta obleteration are thier main drawers.

 

Monsters with ? ATK only have their effects, which would determine their ATK, active while on the field, so their ATK is either treated as ? or 0 while in the deck, hand, or Graveyard, depending on the situation.

 

So, I'd suggest, again, that you put their negative ATK in parentheses so its ATK is always treated as such, no matter what circumstance.

 

... but, that would make it so its ATK couldn't be altered... maybe

 

(This card's Original ATK is always treated as -1800) or something along those lines.

 

Like Chimera (As I've cited, before)

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Chimera_the_Flying_Mythical_Beast

 

I'm not sure though... chimera uses the parenthesis to say what it is treated as, not its ATK...

[snetonobre]

His right. You will need parenthesis. Also, they only writed this in it's card text to be affected by phantom beast support cards in the TCG since chimera japanese name was "Winged Phantom Beast Chimera". Note that all phantom beast support card also support Gazelle the King of Mythical Beasts, because gazelle japanese name was Phantom Beast King Gazelle. In a similar way, since all Archfiend monsters have Demon instead of Archfiend in their japanese names, the following cards are also Archfiend monsters, since they all have Demon in it's japanese name:

A Deal with Dark Ruler

Axe of Despair

B. Skull Dragon

Beast of Talwar

Fiend Skull Dragon

Lesser Fiend

Shadow Tamer

Summoned Skull

Toon Summoned Skull

 

The only reason to they not have Archfiend in their names, is the fact that thay have been printed in the TCG before the Archfiend support cards.

[Chaos Flame]

His right. You will need parenthesis. Also' date=' they only writed this in it's card text to be affected by phantom beast support cards in the TCG since chimera japanese name was "Winged Phantom Beast Chimera". Note that all phantom beast support card also support Gazelle the King of Mythical Beasts, because gazelle japanese name was Phantom Beast King Gazelle. In a similar way, since all Archfiend monsters have Demon instead of Archfiend in their japanese names, the following cards are also Archfiend monsters, since they all have Demon in it's japanese name:

A Deal with Dark Ruler

Axe of Despair

B. Skull Dragon

Beast of Talwar

Fiend Skull Dragon

Lesser Fiend

Shadow Tamer

Summoned Skull

Toon Summoned Skull

 

The only reason to they not have Archfiend in their names, is the fact that thay have been printed in the TCG before the Archfiend support cards.

[/quote']

 

I could just say their ATK and DEF are ALWAYS treated as [insert - # here]. Besides, if these were real cards I would be able to put a negative number in the ATK/DEF place and not have to worry about this. So for the sake of this, just pretend that their stats are always negative regardless of where they are.

Also, please stop just posting to comment on that, technically there is an OCG rule that the card maker (myself in this case) can make up OCG for their cards if nothing like it has been doe before. Negative atk has never been done before, ergo I get to make the OCG for it.

[Chaos Flame]

bump ^^

[snetonobre]

His right. You will need parenthesis. Also' date=' they only writed this in it's card text to be affected by phantom beast support cards in the TCG since chimera japanese name was "Winged Phantom Beast Chimera". Note that all phantom beast support card also support Gazelle the King of Mythical Beasts, because gazelle japanese name was Phantom Beast King Gazelle. In a similar way, since all Archfiend monsters have Demon instead of Archfiend in their japanese names, the following cards are also Archfiend monsters, since they all have Demon in it's japanese name:

A Deal with Dark Ruler

Axe of Despair

B. Skull Dragon

Beast of Talwar

Fiend Skull Dragon

Lesser Fiend

Shadow Tamer

Summoned Skull

Toon Summoned Skull

 

The only reason to they not have Archfiend in their names, is the fact that thay have been printed in the TCG before the Archfiend support cards.

[/quote']

 

I could just say their ATK and DEF are ALWAYS treated as [insert - # here]. Besides, if these were real cards I would be able to put a negative number in the ATK/DEF place and not have to worry about this. So for the sake of this, just pretend that their stats are always negative regardless of where they are.

Also, please stop just posting to comment on that, technically there is an OCG rule that the card maker (myself in this case) can make up OCG for their cards if nothing like it has been doe before. Negative atk has never been done before, ergo I get to make the OCG for it.

 

Negative attack never have been made before but a card exclusive rule have been made (I don't talking about Chimera; many Alien monsters have the rule of decreasing the attack of a monster in 300 for every A-counter in it, when it battles with a Alien monster). If you don't put parenthesis it will be a simply effect that could even be negated. But if you put them in parenthesis like "(This card original ATK is always treated as -1800)" it will be more than a effect. It will be a rule! And you still can increase/decrease their attacks.