Yang Xiao-Long Posted April 29, 2010 Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 So I was having issues with the cardmaker (still am too, btw), and I came up with this card in complete and utter boredom. Tinypic is my best friend right now. Anyway, here's the card. I'd like to introduce you to my latest creation: Titanosaur, the Berserk Rage [align=center] This card can and must attack all monsters on your opponent's field once each. During battle between this card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent's Life Points. When this card is removed from the field, destroy all other monsters on your field.[/align] Image by Jazin Kay Comments/rates appreciated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeXodus Posted April 29, 2010 Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 i amz tooz i havez to uze tinyzpix tooz. nice card by the way. a tad bit oped and minor ocg flaws but ok.6/10o I also herdzuleikmukipz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yang Xiao-Long Posted April 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 i amz tooz i havez to uze tinyzpix tooz. nice card by the way. a tad bit oped and minor ocg flaws but ok.6/10o I also herdzuleikmukipz? Ignoring all your spelling errors there... If I have OCG errors, what are they? Tell me how it's OP'ed please. I prefer Cyndaquil thank you very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeXodus Posted April 29, 2010 Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 i amz tooz i havez to uze tinyzpix tooz. nice card by the way. a tad bit oped and minor ocg flaws but ok.6/10o I also herdzuleikmukipz? Ignoring all your spelling errors there... If I have OCG errors' date=' what are they? Tell me how it's OP'ed please. I prefer Cyndaquil thank you very much.[/quote'] Well for one, those were purposely spelled like that.Now for the OCG.I will write the effect and correct them in there:This card must attack all monsters on your opponent's side of the field once each. During battle between this card and a (face-up or face-down) Defense Postion monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent's Life Points. When this card is destroyed (it's easier and shorter to understand), destroy all monsters on your field. Some of them are OCG Errors, some are just to make the effect shorter and easier to understand. It's OP'ed because it has 3200 ATK and IMO, anything over 3000 is an OP'ed ATK. And there isn't anything that makes this card any weaker.The lower the ATK because if it attacks all monsters on the opponents field, (I doubt the opponent's going to somethin higher than 3200) then that's going to deal damage. It's a good card, don't get me wrong, just some minor details and a tad OP'ed IMO though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altaïr Posted April 29, 2010 Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 "This card must attack all monsters on your opponent's field once each. During battle between this card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent's Life Points. When this card is removed from the field, destroy all other monsters on your field."is beast warrior a type?so far ?/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeXodus Posted April 29, 2010 Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 is beast warrior a type? yes Here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted April 29, 2010 Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 I would reduce the ATK to 3000. :SI dun like cards that break the Rule of 3000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.