Jump to content

Hyper-Excel Kinesis Comments???


Ghoulish

Recommended Posts

as usual dont just say awful or ocg errors plz specify, comment and rate.

 

1y8hkw.jpg

 

This card can be Normal Summoned without Tributes while you control 2 or more face-up Psychic-Type monsters. Once per turn you can pay 1000 Life Points to increase this card's ATK by 1000 and have it inflict Peircing Damage during your next Battle Phase. Once per turn when your opponent activates an effect that would destroy 1 or more Psychic-Type monsters you control you can pay 500 Life Points to negate the effect and destroy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SDD is the best.../sarcasm

 

The last effect is OPed... increase the cost or make it once per turn (it would be better make it once per turn)...

 

I feel just the last effect is useful, thought maybe I side it in a Psychic Deck due to easyness of summon...

 

Meh card is meh...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whats ssd stand for? and also the cost is fair high when you think about it, cause oif all the pther monsters decreasing their life points. ill make these changes instead of specialsummon while you control 2 psychic types, ill put u cn normal summon without tribute while you control 2 psychic types, increases the difficulty to summon. and with thr lest effect ill leave the cost as it is and make it only if it targets 1 psychic typer monster.. what do u think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whats ssd stand for? and also the cost is fair high when you think about it' date=' cause oif all the pther monsters decreasing their life points. ill make these changes instead of specialsummon while you control 2 psychic types, ill put u cn normal summon without tribute while you control 2 psychic types, increases the difficulty to summon. and with thr lest effect ill leave the cost as it is and make it only if it targets 1 psychic typer monster.. what do u think?

[/quote']

 

SDD = Stardust Dragon

 

 

[spoiler=]400px-BrainResearchLabANPR-EN-C-1E.png

 

 

That'z the reason of OPedness...

 

[spoiler=And compared to this:]

ThoughtRulerArchfiendTDGS-EN-UR-1E.png

 

 

 

I suggest you this:

 

Leave the effect of SS.

Erase the ATK boost effect.

Leave the Negation effect, make it Once per turn or increase the cost to 1000.

You would get a balanced beastick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what aspect of this card is like stardust? ill chnage it to once per turn and if it is like stardust i didnt mean for it to be, i changed it to u can normal summon it without tibutes if u have 2 face-up psychic monsters what do u think now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what aspect of this card is like stardust? ill chnage it to once per turn and if it is like stardust i didnt mean for it to be' date=' i changed it to u can normal summon it without tibutes if u have 2 face-up psychic monsters what do u think now?

[/quote']

 

You can Tribute this card to negate the activation of a Spell Card' date=' Trap Card, or Effect Monster's effect that destroys a card(s) on the field, and destroy that card.

[/quote']

 

That's the aspect that you want...

 

Now the card is me balanced but... meh...

 

I won't use it ina Psychic Deck thought is better now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol yea i wouoldnt use it in a psychic type deck either, easy to summon, high attack, good effect both offensively and defensivly (sarcasm), nah seriously though thats ur opion its kool in my psuychic decks i prefer to run overdrive teleporter for easy summoning of hyper psychic blaster.i never wnated stardusts effect btw lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

very good card

is good power added to psychic themed decks

not to hard to summon possible otk

swarming tactics plus destruction protection

piercing damage(never been a big fan of it)

an easy swing on the field like giant trunade special summon this and you will have control of the field

almost like a stardust dragon specifically for psychic themed decks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...