Fraz Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 The whole Lightsworn archtype is based on lucksack milling their way to victory. No its not I liked this. This's how pros debate.No it isn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 We all know what these guys do. Where should they be on the list? I say ban. WE ALL KNOW WHAT CHAOS EMPEROR DRAGON DOES WHERE SHOULD IT BE ON THE LIST? I SAY BAN The whole Lightsworn archtype is based on lucksack milling their way to victory. No its not I liked this. This's how pros debate. Actually, most pros debate by quoting on someone and saying it's all wrong in the most insulting, offensive, showing off, and genius sort of way possible. That way other people think they have something great up their sleeve, when in fact the people quoted are far right sometimes. My explanation: Judgement Dragon is better than Chimerateches. Why ban them when there's more to feed to the ban monster?Also, Chimeratech Overdragon's ban will result in Crab Helmet's avatar being a banned monster, which is ironic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 The whole Lightsworn archtype is based on lucksack milling their way to victory. No its not I liked this. This's how pros debate. Actually' date=' most pros debate by quoting on someone and saying it's all wrong in the most insulting, offensive, showing off, and genius sort of way possible. That way other people think they have something great up their sleeve, when in fact the people quoted are far right sometimes. [/quote'] You're fucktarded. You don't know jack about discussing at pro level. [spoiler=EDIT: How could I possibly forget this old classic?] OT: Overdragon is rather meh. But Fortress Dragon is simply awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted May 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 We all know what these guys do. Where should they be on the list? I say ban. WE ALL KNOW WHAT CHAOS EMPEROR DRAGON DOES WHERE SHOULD IT BE ON THE LIST? I SAY BAN The whole Lightsworn archtype is based on lucksack milling their way to victory. No its not I liked this. This's how pros debate. I lol'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 The whole Lightsworn archtype is based on lucksack milling their way to victory. No its not I liked this. This's how pros debate. Actually' date=' most pros debate by quoting on someone and saying it's all wrong in the most insulting, offensive, showing off, and genius sort of way possible. That way other people think they have something great up their sleeve, when in fact the people quoted are far right sometimes. [/quote'] You're fucktarded. You don't know jack about discussing at pro level. [spoiler=EDIT: How could I possibly forget this old classic?] OT: Overdragon is rather meh. But Fortress Dragon is simply awesome. I don't know Jack discussing at pro level. What is he like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 Since when have LS been horrible without JD? They only thing they lose is an instant win :? MY POST HATH BEEN IGNORED!!! It feels lonely... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 Guys, I just realized LS can still exist without JD. I mean, the only thing they lose is their instant win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 Guys' date=' I just realized LS can still exist without JD. I mean, the only thing they lose is their instant win.[/quote'] The instant win is what gave them their meta status, but it isn't a bad deck without JD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 Guys' date=' I just realized LS can still exist without JD. I mean, the only thing they lose is their instant win.[/quote'] The instant win is what gave them their meta status, but it isn't a bad deck without JD. I'm glad you share my opinion. I feel so smart for having figured that out right now. ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 I'd rather run a LS deck with no JDs than one with no Honests and Gardnas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.