Jump to content

Infernity Launcher. Is it Bannable?


Recommended Posts

Limiting Infernity Archfiend would solve the problem. Infernity Launcher is good but it's certainly not broke.

 

How would that even remotely come close to solving the problem... you only need one of those to OTK.

 

It's kind of like how limiting bestiari made GB counterable enough for them to not screw up the meta. With one archfiend sure you can still set up an otk but then if your archfiend gets removed you auto lose. It then becomes incredibly risky to run infernity in tournament' date=' up to a point where it isn't a viable option anymore.

[/quote']

 

Or we could just ban one of the cards instead of de facto banning the whole archetype.

 

BTW, limiting Bestiari wouldn't have mattered if Stardust hadn't been released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Why kill a card/deck when you can solve the problem without killing it. It's the reason why we lose players. The whole point is to have a decent meta with many viable deck type.

 

The question here isn't if the GB problem was solved by limiting bestiari, but if limiting archfiend would push down infernities in the tier list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not really. all you need is 1 archfiend.

3 just makes it faster, thats all.

 

Mirage > SS Archfiend and Beetle and search Launcher

Beetle > 2 more Beetles

Sync play Launcher > SS Archfiend and Beetle and so and so forth.

 

GB are still strong, just a tad slower thats all.

 

if you limit Launcher, the entire combo kinda ceases. although its still powerful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's saying switch the names of Zero-Max and Infernity Launcher. Thus, what is Zero-Max would be searchable by Archfiend (because it's called Infernity Launcher) while what is Infernity Launcher would not (because it's called Zero-Max). This would severely lower the brokenness of the combo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...