Jump to content

An archetype with 0 ATK?! {[MONOCHROME]}


touzaikokon

Recommended Posts

Look - these suck.

I'm not going to even bother read the effects - these cards aren't legible for the Realistic Cards Section.

All pics must have backgrounds to them - which makes them real.

Yours are Fake Types.

Screw them.

 

What the hell is your problem man? How aren't these cards legible for RC? The cards are good. So the pictures happen to have a grey backround Big.F***ing.Deal. And how are these cards "Fake Types", when the cards clearly use Official Types (Warrior)?

 

Screw them, screw them? No good sir, SCREW YOU!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol now this is something i could never do' date=' what i mean I tend to float away from my orignal idea but this..this so doesn't do that. Its interesting and at first i thought they were oped to be honest.

After reading though its real inspiring, makes me wanna get my Hue set done all the more faster before i post them

Rating 10/10 &a rep ^^

oh i don't see any OCG errors either

heres two cards that can work for this set real well "Familiar Knight" & "Warrior Lady of the Waistland" then of course theres "Giant Rat"

[/quote']

Thanks, really appreciate that. I totally wasn't thinking about searchers at the time I created these, otherwise I probably would've made less cards that Special Summon Monochromes...oh well, too late now, lol.

 

No OCG errors of any kind on the cards.

 

Berserker seems pretty good. Kinda like a suicide bomber.

 

Brawler's stats are to high for a Level 3. Either make it Level 4' date=' or lower the ATK to 1400-1600.

 

Warlord seems okay as a decent swarmer.

 

9.8/10

[/quote']

Thanks. I kept Brawler at 3 because any other 0/1700 card would be 3 or lower...and yes, I know that's ignoring its own effect, but for the most part, they're all underleveled (or at least I tried to make them that way).

 

Look - these suck.

I'm not going to even bother read the effects - these cards aren't legible for the Realistic Cards Section.

All pics must have backgrounds to them - which makes them real.

Yours are Fake Types.

Screw them.

Um...okay. O__o

Any constructive input beyond adding backgrounds?

 

What the hell is your problem man? How aren't these cards legible for RC? The cards are good. So the pictures happen to have a grey backround Big.F***ing.Deal. And how are these cards "Fake Types"' date=' when the cards clearly use Official Types (Warrior)?

 

Screw them, screw them? No good sir, SCREW YOU!

[/quote']

Thanks for the defense, lol. But don't worry about it, Oleon is entitled to his/her opinion.

 

I love this set' date=' but the kicker here is all those lovely support cards that search low ATK monsters. Like Hymn said, Giant Rat, Warrior Lady, Sangan are all suddenly gonna get the boot. And Sanctorium is OP'd hands down.

 

But really, I love the idea. 9.9/10.

[/quote']

lol, yeah, once again, I totally forgot about the low ATK searchers when I made this...a Monochrome Deck would be the lulz, though.

 

 

Thanks for all the comments, everyone! I also added a new card, "Monochrome Ambush". That should liven things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Almost forgot about this thread xD Any chance your going to continue it dchi?

 

lol, I plan to, but I need to find more black/white pictures. Plus, I'm trying to finish up a new set and work at the same time, which isn't really going well. But I'll keep working on this as much as I can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, yes, I could do that, but all the pics I use were black/white to begin with. That's what made them special. Plus, they were all from the same source. It would be weird if I started drawing from another place that is totally different.

 

But I may consider doing that if it will help me complete the set...I probably will, eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...