Yankee Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Oh' date=' Schrödinger, one of the most underrated Physicists of all time. I love this "paradox."[/quote'] As do I, Ice. It's a shame most of the people who posted here don't understand quantum theory. If they did, they wouldn't have posted such third rate responses. Schrodinger is explaining that unless you can see the cat, you must assume that the cat is both alive and dead, but if you can see the cat, you can determine whether the cat is either alive or dead. However, simple logic says nothing can be alive and dead at the same time.Sad day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Culpa Posted May 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Oh' date=' Schrödinger, one of the most underrated Physicists of all time. I love this "paradox."[/quote'] As do I, Ice. It's a shame most of the people who posted here don't understand quantum theory. If they did, they wouldn't have posted such third rate responses. Schrodinger is explaining that unless you can see the cat, you must assume that the cat is both alive and dead, but if you can see the cat, you can determine whether the cat is either alive or dead. However, simple logic says nothing can be alive and dead at the same time.Sad day? Unfortunately, to understand an theory in physics, you need to be able to grasp the fact the unknown is everything and nothing, until it becomes known. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Schrodinger's cat walked into a bar. And it didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 what kinda person puts a cat in a box and randomly sets a poisonous gas timer? Obviously physicists named Erwin Schrodinger. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Culpa Posted May 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 You people do not comprehend the simple, so of course, the complex would be impossible to explain to you. -.- It is not that he put a cat in the box to test this. He simply came up with the idea. It is a simple problem really. That which you cannot observe is unknown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 I understand... But I want to know if steel cases had glass windows... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Without opening the box, you cannot know whether the cat is alive or dead, and therefore, until you open the chamber, the cat is considered both alive and dead at the same time. I don't know about the last part, but this is true. If the poison is released at a random time, you are unsure of when the cat died. You could wait years, and assuming the cat does not die of lack of food, it could be alive because the poison did not activate. Likewise, you could wait a few seconds and the poison would activate, killing the cat. If you waited an infinite amount of time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Culpa Posted May 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Dark, you understand the physical, but not the mental. Because the cat could be dead, and it could be alive, it is both. It is the same as the ability to create a new dimension with every choice you make, such as multiverse theory dictates. The cat, while in the box, exists in a state between two dimensions, in one where it is living, and in the other where it is dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black★Star Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Its dead...if you put a cat, in a steel box, with no air source... its gonna die... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Culpa Posted May 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Its dead...if you put a cat' date=' in a steel box, with no air source... its gonna die...[/quote'] You have no grasp that this is theory, not practice, do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twig Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Its dead...if you put a cat' date=' in a steel box, with no air source... its gonna die...[/quote'] Good point, but cat still has three minutes or so... The paradox is still there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Because the cat could be dead, and it could be alive, it is both. It is the same as the ability to create a new dimension with every choice you make, such as multiverse theory dictates. The cat, while in the box, exists in a state between two dimensions, in one where it is living, and in the other where it is dead. Gah, I need to stop using logic for this. My logic is that at any given time, the cat will either be dead or alive. It doesn't matter that you don't know which is correct, but it still holds true that it will be dead OR alive, not and. If you were to put a glass window in the steel box, and see the cat, it would be in one universe at any given time. The living one, the poison opens, and then the dead one. How does taking away "sight" create a split in universes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesirson Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 It was 75 years ago. I suppose the cat's dead by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 People didn't understand my Schrodinger's cat joke. And people didn't understand my Schrodinger's cat joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raylen Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 You don't' date=' thinking of the technology they had then.Until it's proven dead, it's alive.[/quote'] You're arguing a lost cause. Take a different example, I could be in where I say I am, Anchorage, Alaska, or somewhere completely different, e.g. Honolulu, Hawaii, you have no way of knowing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 Cat would be dead, no oxygen, food, water cat is f***ed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godot Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 Cat would be dead' date=' no oxygen, food, water cat is f***ed[/quote'] The Cat could survive for at least 5 minutes. So, pretend that this paradox only lasted for those 5 minutes. Did the poison go off? Or is the cat still alive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Culpa Posted May 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 *sigh* You people still don't grasp the concept. Let's just say the cat has a re-breather. Now, it has unlimited oxygen. Then, let's say it has a food supply and water. It would still be both alive AND dead, unless you could see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godot Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 *sigh* You people still don't grasp the concept. Let's just say the cat has a re-breather. Now' date=' it has unlimited oxygen. Then, let's say it has a food supply and water. It would still be both alive AND dead, unless you could see it.[/quote'] Was that directed to me? Because I fully understand it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 I've known this for awhile, and it's bad logic to follow. It isn't both of the two, it COULD BE both of the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 *sigh* You people still don't grasp the concept. Let's just say the cat has a re-breather. Now' date=' it has unlimited oxygen. Then, let's say it has a food supply and water. It would still be both alive AND dead, unless you could see it.[/quote'] You still haven't answered my question. If there was a glass window, you can plainly see whether it is dead or alive. But once you take away "sight", it randomly becomes both? It's the same scenario for the cat, only you cannot see what's happening. Atlas summed it up well with his previous post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smear Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 Get a see-through box. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amethyst Phoenix Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 I think the douchebag that did this to cats should be skinned alive and set on fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 I think the douchebag that did this to cats should be skinned alive and set on fire. But until we find the man's corpse he is BOTH skinned alive and set on fire and a deranged cat murderer that took his secret to the grave. :S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godot Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 I think the douchebag that did this to cats should be skinned alive and set on fire. He didn't do it, I believe. I think it was just a theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.