Jump to content

IT'S A TRAP.dek


Recommended Posts

...To run an ALL TRAPS DECK?

MY GOD!?

 

I ran something like this on WC09 when it came out.

It actually won once against Judgment Dragon. o.O

Only because I used Nightmare lolWheel.

 

Monsters: [0]

 

Spells: [0]

 

Traps: [47]

1x Trap Dustshoot

1x Mirror Force

3x Nightmare Wheel

2x Bottomless Trap Hole

3x Dimensional Prison

3x Negate Attack

2x Acid Trap Hole

2x House of Adhesive Tape

2x Forced Back

1x Black Horn of Heaven

1x Solemn Judgment

3x Dark Bribe

2x Solemn Wishes

3x Bad Reaction to Simochi

1x Wall of Revealing Light

3x Gift Card

1x Seven Tools of the Bandit

1x Gravity Bind

1x Magical Cylinder

3x Zoma the Spirit

1x Torrential Tribute

2x Shadow Spell

 

Suprisingly, this is quite fun to play.

Basically - it's a Burn Type of theme to it all, which can also resort to negating and stalling for eventually them Decking Out, which has happened once or twice.

 

I was increasingly strict about having a Deck of all Traps, seeing as it hasn't been done in Your Deck before.

 

Now, post, do these things! D:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shadow Spell?

Ugh.

 

YES. 3 CYLINDER.

Filler cards. Its a double bonus in this.

 

Its part of the LP deduction, and a stall card at the same time.

Helper to the two winning condition.

 

This is pretty lulzy.

It's forcing them to do stuff.

 

Not a fan of House of Adhesive, I haven't seen much play with it yet.

Neg for what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guess this deck will only be good for Turbo duel, cos in normal duel, it will totally owned by Jinzo and Royal Decree which they used very often, and Solemn judgement is limited to 1 btw.

In turbo duel Traps are need much more than normal duel so using Jinzo or Royal Decree will hinder not only the opponent but the players who use it as well. and they use more number of Traps than normally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Tronta:

The jabroni says NO.

I'm running an ALL TRAPS Deck, whether you like it or not.

 

-1 House of Adhesive

+1 Ring of Destruction?

 

Can't believe I forgot it.

 

And, whether you like it or not, not alot of people run Jinzo or Royal Decree. Liek - ever.

 

Besides, Tronta, this doesn't even run many Trap Cards that are Continuous anyway. I was thinking of Uria, but I made this for teh lulz.

 

I lol'd at how this tested.

 

First turn:

Set Ring of Destruction, Magic Cylinder, Wall of Revealing Light, and 2 Nightmare Wheels.

 

Their turn:

Summoned Lonefire Blossom, used LolDouble Summon (Told him he was bad at Yugimanz.) And summoned up another Lonefire. Tributed first for Giga, tributed second for Tytannial. Used Supervise, getting Lonefire back and tributed for Bird of Roses. I chained with Ring of Destruction on Tytannial, and used 2 Nightmare Wheels on Gigaplant. That meant -2800 for both of us. He attacked directly with Bird of Roses, and I used Magic Cylinder, which, overall the first turn took -4700.

 

My turn:

Sets Gift Card, and Bad Reaction to Simochi.

 

Their Turn:

Takes -1000 thanks to Nightmare Wheel.

Forgets to use Gigaplant for a second Tytannial using Lonefire, or was just plain scared of doing so. I flipped up Bad Reaction to Simochi, and taunted him. He had 2300.

He did some awesome combo getting him Black Brutdrago, Gigaplant, and Tytannial. He attacks, expecting for game, and I just flipped up Gift Card for game.

 

This is suprisingly versatile. :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Zeonark

-1 House of Adhesive

+1 Ring of Destruction?

 

No, because this is against the law.

 

Anyway, I should test this in WC10 with Uria for the lulz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Zeonark

Wait a second, you actually put Ring Of Destruction in your deck?

 

I thought you were joking. You know it's banned, right?

 

EDIT: Ha. You edited a minute before I posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...