Gladiator Beast Fear

[RAEGING D0GKING]

[align=center]Gladiator Beast Fear

Effect

When this card is Special Summoned by the effect of a "Gladiator Beast" monster, you can remove from play 1 "Gladiator Beast" from your Graveyard to destroy 1 card on the field. If you destroyed a monster on your side of the field, Special Summon 1 Level 4 or lower "Gladiator Beast" other than "Gladiator Beast Fear" from your Deck. It cannot attack during your next Battle Phase. At the end of the Battle Phase, if this card attacked or was attacked, you can return this card to your Deck to Special Summon 1 "Gladiator Beast" monster from your Deck except "Gladiator Beast Fear".[/align]

 

Changed to being able to summon GB from Deck instead of hand.

[MarshyK-XS]

I cannot find a single flaw or fault in that card. Good pic good ocg

 

9.7 / 10

 

~MK

[Anbu-of-Sand]

Great effect. No OCG Errors.

Doesn't look like it would be a Gladiator Beast, or Beast-Warrior-Type though.

It better fits the Zombie or Fiend-Type area. But I guess this works to.

 

9.8/10

[dbomurray09]

Cool card Death Sin good job.

[Yankee]

Overpowered.

Has NOBODY seem a GB deck?

This is broken beyond belief for them. It's basically a destroyed card, and a returned GB to your deck.

If not that, it's two free GB summons.

It would be limited or banned.

[RAEGING D0GKING]

I cannot find a single flaw or fault in that card. Good pic good ocg

 

9.7 / 10

 

~MK

 

Thanks

 

Cool card Death Sin good job.

 

Thanks

 

Overpowered.

Has NOBODY seem a GB deck?

This is broken beyond belief for them. It's basically a destroyed card' date=' and a returned GB to your deck.

If not that, it's two free GB summons.

It would be limited or banned.

 

[/quote']

 

:/

Samnite or someone else can do that.

I NEED TO DESTROY A CARD I HAVE TO SUMMON A GB FROM MY HAND.

And drawing good GBs is hard.

Look at GBs again and look at this card again.

[Yankee]

-.-"

*facepalm*

Lets try this again.

Destroying your own card isn't that difficult in a GB deck.

Having any GB in your hand when you destroy something brings you a chance to tag out for two. Not something you want to see if you're the opponent.

Even if you don't destroy your own card, it's a free destroy, and can get you another GB.

[Skyson]

psst. He's right.

 

Bring him out, put back a GB card (hilariously useful) and blow up any 1 card (GBs love this and need this a lot)

 

Destroy your own card (target Waboku, chain? loleasy), special summon another GB from your hand. Oh look, it's Special Summoned by the effect of a Gladiator Beast. So you get its effect too.

 

It ignites tons of combos for GB that would make an EZmode decktype even easier to play.

 

I can't believe you're telling people to take a better look at GBs when you can easily get around the destroying your own card bit. It's an optional weapon that GBs really don't need.

 

It's not as overpowered as Lust is making it seem, but setting up for it is hella easy to do. Not exactly something to topdeck, at least. >_>

 

 

6/10.

[RAEGING D0GKING]

Card updated.

[Yankee]

Now it's a lot better. ^_\\\

[RAEGING D0GKING]

Now it's a lot better. ^_\\\

Would you mind giving me a comment and a rate?

:3

[Insert_Name_Here]

Nice card, its good for any GB deck

No OCG errors

Fairly Balanced

10/10

[Yankee]

Well, now it's one of a card GB might have to think about tagging out for, which is good.

It removes a GB, which Glads don't like, but destroys a card on the field. Now if you destroy your own card, it has to be a monster, which also balances it. But you get a GB, so it's a +0 right now. Add on that the monster can't attack this turn, meaning you get don't two free tag outs makes it a pretty good, but not overpowered GB. It has respectable ATK for a GB, so it might survive an attack. If you chose to tag for it, it probably WILL survive, and live to fight another day.

All in all, it's not bad ^_\\\

[RAEGING D0GKING]

Well' date=' now it's one of a card GB might have to think about tagging out for, which is good.

It removes a GB, which Glads don't like, but destroys a card on the field. Now if you destroy your own card, it has to be a monster, which also balances it. But you get a GB, so it's a +0 right now. Add on that the monster can't attack this turn, meaning you get don't two free tag outs makes it a pretty good, but not overpowered GB. It has respectable ATK for a GB, so it might survive an attack. If you chose to tag for it, it probably WILL survive, and live to fight another day.

All in all, it's not bad ^_\\\

[/quote']

 

You forget ;D

If I destroy my own monster and then summon another its more of a +1 cos I get its effect.

Anyway I can fix the card?

 

EDIT : Thanks Sound Pulse.

[Insert_Name_Here]

Well' date=' now it's one of a card GB might have to think about tagging out for, which is good.

It removes a GB, which Glads don't like, but destroys a card on the field. Now if you destroy your own card, it has to be a monster, which also balances it. But you get a GB, so it's a +0 right now. Add on that the monster can't attack this turn, meaning you get don't two free tag outs makes it a pretty good, but not overpowered GB. It has respectable ATK for a GB, so it might survive an attack. If you chose to tag for it, it probably WILL survive, and live to fight another day.

All in all, it's not bad ^_\\\

[/quote']

 

You forget ;D

If I destroy my own monster and then summon another its more of a +1 cos I get its effect.

Anyway I can fix the card?

 

EDIT : Thanks Sound Pulse.

Your welcome

[Yankee]

Well' date=' now it's one of a card GB might have to think about tagging out for, which is good.

It removes a GB, which Glads don't like, but destroys a card on the field. Now if you destroy your own card, it has to be a monster, which also balances it. But you get a GB, so it's a +0 right now. Add on that the monster can't attack this turn, meaning you get don't two free tag outs makes it a pretty good, but not overpowered GB. It has respectable ATK for a GB, so it might survive an attack. If you chose to tag for it, it probably WILL survive, and live to fight another day.

All in all, it's not bad ^_\\\

[/quote']

 

You forget ;D

If I destroy my own monster and then summon another its more of a +1 cos I get its effect.

Anyway I can fix the card?

 

EDIT : Thanks Sound Pulse.

 

Meh, +'s and -'s only count for field/hand advantage

So summoning the monster replaces the card you lost,

-1 for card lost

+1 for gain

However..thinking about it

You're losing a card in the hand by replacing 1 lost.

Thats a -1 overall

[Guest JoshIcy]

+0... Destroying the card is far more useful than negging your hand when GB's after a certain point dont use their hand as "much" =/... The -1 is just silly to do.

[yugioh designer]

Wow, awesome cad, i can't encounter OCG errors, but because its effect, makes so easily summon a gladiator beast fusion

Rate:9/10

[RAEGING D0GKING]

Wow' date=' awesome cad, i can't encounter OCG errors, but because its effect, makes so easily summon a gladiator beast fusion

Rate:9/10

[/quote']

 

Thats the whole point.

If it would say "You cannot Fusion Summon this turn" then it would be UP and would have no use.

Thanks anyway.

 

Ehh gone edit the card slightly.

[.Impact]

the way u said it makes sense but i dont think its correct ocg

u should say "it cannot attack during the turn it is Special Summoned."

[RAEGING D0GKING]

the way u said it makes sense but i dont think its correct ocg

u should say "it cannot attack during the turn it is Special Summoned."

 

No.

Me : My turn

I attack

I destroy

I use effect

At the end of the battle phase I summon this

HA I SUMMON A NEW MONSTER AND GUESS WHAT

IT CANT ATTACK THIS TURN

BUT YOU GOT PWNED COS MY BATTLE PHASE IS OVER

Opponent : Crap

[RAEGING D0GKING]

BUMP